N400 as an index of uncontrolled categorization processing in brand extension

This study examined the ERP (event-related potential) correlates of categorization processing in brand extension with irrelative task. Participants faced two sequential stimuli in a pair consisting of a soft drink brand name (S1) and a product name (S2) which comprised two categories: beverage (typical product of the brand, e.g. Coke branded soda water) and clothing (atypical product of the brand, even though sometimes it was seen in the real market, e.g. Coke branded sport wear). The N400 was recorded and more largely distributed in frontal, frontal-central and central areas when S2 was clothing compared with beverage. The study did not require the participants to evaluate that the brand extension was appropriate or not, the N400 recorded here was, therefore, irrelative to the task difficulty and the conscious categorization process. We speculated that it reflected an integration processing related with the mental category. The brand performed the role of prime which aroused the participants' association of the brand-related typical products and attributes retrieving from their long term memory. The product name activated an unconscious processing of comparison between the brand and the product. In this process, the participant treated the brand as a mental category and classified the product as a member of it. There would be a large cognitive reaction which elicited the N400 if the product's attributes were atypical to the category of the brand. These findings might help us understand the N400 component in unconscious mental categorization and supported the categorization hypotheses in brand extension theory which was crucial in consumer psychology.

[1]  Darryl G. Humphrey,et al.  Toward a Psychophysiological Assessment of Dynamic Changes in Mental Workload , 1994, Human factors.

[2]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[3]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[4]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[5]  David M. Boush,et al.  A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation , 1991 .

[6]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. , 1986 .

[8]  Qingguo Ma,et al.  P300 and categorization in brand extension , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  C. Pernet,et al.  Neural timing of visual implicit categorization. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[11]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[12]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[13]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Context effects in a category verification task as assessed by event-related brain potential (ERP) measures , 1998, Biological Psychology.

[14]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Probe of Incidental Semantic Association , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  J. Ford,et al.  Automatic semantic priming abnormalities in schizophrenia. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  M. I. Núñez-Peña,et al.  N400 and category exemplar associative strength. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  S. Koyama,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the typicality effect of human cognitive categorization. , 1998, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[20]  M. Kutas,et al.  The lateral distribution of event-related potentials during sentence processing , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[22]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[23]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Seeing and Hearing Meaning: ERP and fMRI Evidence of Word versus Picture Integration into a Sentence Context , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.