Comparison of Liquid Swine Manure and Aqua-Ammonia Nitrogen Application Timing on Subsurface Drainage Water Quality in Iowa

In Iowa and many other Midwestern states, excess water is removed artificially through subsurface drainage systems. While these drainage systems are vital for crop production, nitrogen (N), added as manure or commercial fertilizer, or derived from soil organic matter, can be carried as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) to downstream water bodies. A five-year, five-replication, field study was initiated in the fall of 1999 in Pocahontas County, Iowa, on 0.05 ha plots that are predominantly Nicollet, Webster, and Canisteo clay loams with 3% to 5% organic matter located on glacial till within the Des Moines Lobe. The objective was to determine the influence of seasonal N application as ammonia or liquid swine manure on flow-weighted NO3-N concentrations and losses in subsurface drainage water and crop yields in a corn-soybean rotation. Four aqua-ammonia N treatments (168 or 252 kg N ha-1 applied for corn in late fall or as an early season side-dress) and three manure treatments (218 kg N ha-1 for corn in late fall or spring or 168 kg N ha-1 in the fall for both corn and soybean) were imposed on subsurface-drained, continuous flow-monitored plots. Precipitation during the drainage season (March to November) was slightly below the long-term norm (722 mm) for all four years in the study period and ranged from 615 mm in 2001 (85% of normal) to 707 mm (98% of normal) in 2004. Monthly rainfall was highly variable, and subsurface drainage, or the lack thereof, usually mimicked the precipitation patterns. On average, 69% of subsurface drainage occurred in May and June of each year, with lower amounts in April and July. Four-year average flow-weighted NO3-N concentrations measured in drainage water were ranked: spring aqua-ammonia 252 (23 mg L-1) = fall manure 168 every year (23 mg L-1) > fall aqua-ammonia 252 (19 mg L-1) = spring manure 218 (18 mg L-1) = fall manure 218 (17 mg L-1) > spring aqua-ammonia 168 (15 mg L-1) = fall aqua-ammonia 168 (14 mg L-1). Corn yields were significantly greater (p = 0.05) for the spring and fall manure 218 rates than for non-manure treatments. Soybean yields were significantly greater (p = 0.05) for the treatments with a spring nitrogen application to the previous corn crop. Overall, under the slightly dry to normal precipitation conditions of this study, corn yields and NO3-N concentrations in subsurface drainage were not significantly different (p = 0.05) between fall and spring treatments at the 168 aqua-ammonia or 218 kg ha-1 N manure N rates.

[1]  David R Schmidt,et al.  A Manure Management Survey of Minnesota Swine Producers: Effect of Farm Size on Manure Application , 1996 .

[2]  J. S. Schepers,et al.  Nitrate contamination of groundwater in North America , 1989 .

[3]  G W Randall,et al.  Nitrate nitrogen in surface waters as influenced by climatic conditions and agricultural practices. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  J. Hanway How a corn plant develops , 1966 .

[5]  K. Reddy,et al.  Water quality effects of drainage in humid regions. , 1999 .

[6]  W. W. Nelson,et al.  Nitrate losses through subsurface tile drainage in Conservation Reserve Program, alfalfa, and row crop systems , 1997 .

[7]  G W Randall,et al.  Nitrate losses in subsurface drainage from a corn-soybean rotation as affected by time of nitrogen application and use of nitrapyrin. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[8]  Antonio P. Mallarino,et al.  A General Guide for Crop Nutrient and Limestone Recommendations in Iowa , 2013 .

[9]  J. P. Schmidt,et al.  Swine Manure Application to Nodulating and Nonnodulating Soybean , 2000 .

[10]  R. H. Fox,et al.  Corn–Soybean Rotation Effects on Nitrate Leaching , 2003 .

[11]  J. Hatfield,et al.  Review and Interpretation: Nitrogen Management Strategies to Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Tile-Drained Midwestern Soils , 2002 .

[12]  D. Karlen,et al.  Using the late spring nitrate test to reduce nitrate loss within a watershed. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[13]  W. Mitsch,et al.  Reducing Nitrogen Loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin: Strategies to Counter a Persistent Ecological Problem , 2001 .

[14]  Matthew J. Helmers,et al.  Nitrogen Application Rate Effect on Nitrate-Nitrogen Concentration and Loss in Subsurface Drainage for a Corn-Soybean Rotation , 2008 .

[15]  Gyles W. Randall,et al.  Corn Production as Affected by Nitrogen Application Timing and Tillage , 2004 .

[16]  Quay Dortch,et al.  Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf , 1996 .

[17]  R. Kanwar,et al.  Nitrate and Water Present in and Flowing from Root‐Zone Soil , 1996 .

[18]  T. F. Morris,et al.  Testing soils and cornstalks to evaluate nitrogen management on the watershed scale. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[19]  G. Randall,et al.  Nitrate losses in subsurface drainage from a corn-soybean rotation as affected by fall and spring application of nitrogen and nitrapyrin. , 2005, Journal of environmental quality.

[20]  Thomas S. Colvin,et al.  Ridge, Moldboard, Chisel, and No‐Till Effects on Tile Water Quality beneath Two Cropping Systems , 1997 .

[21]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  ANNUAL SWINE MANURE APPLICATIONS TO SOYBEAN UNDER CORN-SOYBEAN ROTATION , 2009 .