Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria

Have donors changed their aid-allocation criteria over the past three decades toward greater selectivity, a frequently stated goal of the international development community? Using data on how 22 donors allocated their bilateral aid among 147 countries over 1970-2004, the article finds that after the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989 and especially in the late 1990s, bilateral aid responded more to poverty and the quality of the policy and institutional environment in the recipient countries. Furthermore, the sensitivity of aid allocation to the country's size and its debt burden has declined over time. These results are robust to different samples and model specifications, various econometric techniques, and alternative measures of institutional quality. While the specific factors causing these changes cannot be identified, these presumably include geopolitical and economic concerns and the many changes in the international aid architecture, donors still differ greatly in their selectivity. This suggests that further, multifaceted reforms are needed to ensure even greater selectivity of aid.

[1]  L. Serven,et al.  Measuring Aid Flows: A New Approach , 1998 .

[2]  Aart Kraay,et al.  What Has 100 Billion Dollars Worth of Debt Relief Done for Low-Income Countries? , 2005 .

[3]  S. Claessens,et al.  Policy Selectivity Forgone: Debt and Donor Behavior in Africa , 2003 .

[4]  S. Radelet.  A Primer on Foreign Aid , 2006 .

[5]  A. Alesina,et al.  Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why? , 1998 .

[6]  G. David Roodman.  An Index of Donor Performance , 2004 .

[7]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Making Aid Work , 2007 .

[8]  S. Marchesi,et al.  What Does Motivate Lending and Aid to the Hipcs? , 2004 .

[9]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Who Gets Debt Relief? , 2006 .

[10]  D. Roodman,et al.  The Anarchy of Numbers: Aid, Development, and Cross-Country Empirics , 2003 .

[11]  Henri L. F. de Groot,et al.  Estimation of the Gravity Equation in the Presence of Zero Flows , 2006 .

[12]  Aart C. Kraay,et al.  Does IDA Engage in Defensive Lending? , 2007 .

[13]  D. Dollar,et al.  Aid, Policies, and Growth , 1997 .

[14]  David Roodman.  The Anarchy of Numbers: Aid, Development, and Cross-Country Empirics , 2003 .

[15]  J. Sachs,et al.  Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration , 1995 .

[16]  Eric Werker,et al.  How Much Is a Seat on the Security Council Worth? Foreign Aid and Bribery at the United Nations , 2006, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show? , 2008 .

[18]  Are Aid Agencies Improving? , 2007 .

[19]  J. Berthelemy,et al.  Bilateral donors' aid allocation decisions--a three-dimensional panel analysis , 2004 .

[20]  J. Frankel.  Regional Trading Blocs in the world economic system, reseñado por Antonio Ortiz-Mena L.N. , 1997 .

[21]  Arvind Subramanian,et al.  Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show? , 2005, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[22]  W. Easterly,et al.  Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth , 2003 .

[23]  David Roodman,et al.  Aid, Policies, and Growth: Comment , 2004 .

[24]  Jean-Claude Berthelemy,et al.  Bilateral Donors' Interest vs. Recipients' Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? , 2006 .

[25]  Vinod Thomas.  Restructuring economies in distress : policy reform and the World Bank , 1992 .

[26]  J. Hausman.  Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[27]  Michael Pfaffermayr,et al.  The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: A three-way model with bilateral interaction effects , 2003 .

[28]  D. Dollar,et al.  The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984-2002 , 2004 .

[29]  R. Baldwin.  Towards an Integrated Europe , 1994 .

[30]  R. Rajan,et al.  Aid and Growth , 2005 .

[31]  A. Wood.  Looking Ahead Optimally in Allocating Aid , 2006 .