Improvement of Dead Reckoning in Urban Areas Through Integration of Low-Cost Multisensors

This paper presents a method of accurate dead reckoning in urban areas using low-cost sensors. In the evolution of advanced driver assistance systems, the seamless and accurate positioning of the vehicle has become one of the most important tasks, and dead reckoning plays an important role. Visual odometry is one of the most attractive approaches for this dead reckoning, but in urban areas, the accuracy of visual odometry is degraded due to the surrounding moving objects. Moreover, the error of heading estimation used with the visual odometry cannot be corrected with satellite information, due to poor satellite signal reception. In this study, solutions of these problems are presented to improve the accuracy of the visual odometry in urban environments. The first key technique is moving object detection using inertial measurement unite (IMU) and pattern recognition, which improves the robustness of visual odometry in the dynamic environments. The second key technique is heading estimation using time-series tightly coupled integration of satellite Doppler shift and IMU, which makes heading correction possible where there is poor satellite reception. In evaluation experiments in urban areas, the error of dead reckoning using this proposed method is reduced to about one-fourth compared to the conventional approach.

[1]  Brett Browning,et al.  Continuous trajectory estimation for 3D SLAM from actuated lidar , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[2]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Bundle Adjustment - A Modern Synthesis , 1999, Workshop on Vision Algorithms.

[3]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[4]  Chris Rizos,et al.  A Study on GPS/GLONASS Multiple Reference Station Techniques for Precise Real-Time Carrier Phase-Based Positioning , 2001 .

[5]  Fernando A. Mujica,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Deep Learning on Highway Driving , 2015, ArXiv.

[6]  Charles E. Thorpe,et al.  Simultaneous localization and mapping with detection and tracking of moving objects , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[7]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[8]  Richard B. Langley,et al.  A GPS Velocity Sensor: How Accurate Can It Be? - A First Look , 2004 .

[9]  Osama Masoud,et al.  Detection and classification of vehicles , 2002, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[10]  Takeo Kato,et al.  Vehicle Ego-Motion Estimation and Moving Object Detection using a Monocular Camera , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[11]  Clark F. Olson,et al.  Robust stereo ego-motion for long distance navigation , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[12]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Visual odometry , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[13]  F. V. Graas,et al.  Precise Velocity Estimation Using a Stand-Alone GPS Receiver , 2004 .

[14]  Larry H. Matthies,et al.  Real-time detection of moving objects from moving vehicles using dense stereo and optical flow , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[15]  Marc Pollefeys,et al.  Autonomous Visual Mapping and Exploration With a Micro Aerial Vehicle , 2014, J. Field Robotics.

[16]  Véronique Berge-Cherfaoui,et al.  Moving Objects Detection by Conflict Analysis in Evidential Grids , 2011, 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[17]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Mobile Robot Map Learning from Range Data in Dynamic Environments , 2007 .

[18]  Patrick Bouthemy,et al.  Motion-based obstacle detection and tracking for car driving assistance , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[19]  Young C. Lee Analysis of Range and Position Comparison Methods as a Means to Provide GPS Integrity in the User Receiver , 1986 .