Advanced interactive planning techniques for conformal therapy: high level beam descriptions and volumetric mapping techniques.

PURPOSE To aid in design of conformal radiation therapy treatment plans involving many conformally shaped fields, this work investigates the use of two methodologies to enhance the ease of interactive treatment planning: high-level beam constructs and beam's-eye view volumetric mapping. METHODS AND MATERIALS High-performance computer graphics running on various workstations using a graphical visualization system (AVS) have been used in this work. Software specific to this application has been written in standard FORTRAN and C languages. A new methodology is introduced by defining radiation therapy "fields" to be composed of multiple beam "segments." Fields can then be defined as higher-level entities such as arcs, cones, and other shapes. A "segmental cone" field, for example, is defined by a symmetry axis and a cone angle, and can be used to rapidly place a series of beam segments that converge at the target volume, while reducing the degree of overlap elsewhere. A new beam's-eye view (BEV) volumetric mapping technique is presented to aid in selecting the placement of conformal radiation fields. With this technique, the relative average dose within an organ of interest is calculated for a sampling of isocentric, conformally shaped beams and displayed either as a "globe," which can be combined with the display of anatomical surfaces, or as a two-dimensionally mapped projection. The dose maps from multiple organs can be generated, stacked, or composited with relative weightings to aid in the placement of fields that minimize overlap with critical structures. RESULTS The use of these new methodologies is demonstrated for prostate and lung treatment sites and compared to conventional planning techniques. DISCUSSION The use of many beams for conformal treatment delivery is difficult with current interactive planning. The use of high-level beam constructs provides a means to quickly specify, place, and configure multiple beam arrangements. The BEV volumetrics aids in the placing of fields, which minimize involvement with critical normal tissues. CONCLUSIONS Early experience with the new methodologies suggest that the new methods help to enhance (or at least speed up) the ability of a treatment planner to create optimal radiation treatment field arrangements.

[1]  D L McShan,et al.  Technical considerations in the use of 3-D beam arrangements in the abdomen. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  M Goitein,et al.  Strategies for treating possible tumor extension: some theoretical considerations. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Chaney,et al.  Treatment Planning at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. , 1992, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[4]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimal dose distribution for eradication of heterogeneous tumours. , 1987, Acta oncologica.

[5]  D. McShan,et al.  A large screen digitizer system for radiation therapy treatment planning. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J. Purdy Advances in radiation oncology physics : dosimetry, treatment planning, and brachytherapy , 1992 .

[7]  G T Chen,et al.  Beam's eye view based prostate treatment planning: is it useful? , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  D. McShan,et al.  Displays for Three-Dimensional Treatment Planning. , 1992, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[9]  Daniel L. McShan,et al.  A computerized three-dimensional treatment planning system utilizing interactive colour graphics. , 1979, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  M. Goitein,et al.  Multi-dimensional treatment planning: II. Beam's eye-view, back projection, and projection through CT sections. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  S. Webb Optimization by simulated annealing of three-dimensional conformal treatment planning for radiation fields defined by a multileaf collimator. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Chaney,et al.  Defining Anatomical Structures from Medical Images. , 1992, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[13]  R Mohan,et al.  The role of uncertainty analysis in treatment planning. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  A B Wolbarst,et al.  Optimization of radiation therapy, III: A method of assessing complication probabilities from dose-volume histograms. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  H. Sandler,et al.  A customized non-axial external beam technique for treatment of prostate carcinomas. , 1992, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[16]  D L McShan,et al.  Full integration of the beam's eye view concept into computerized treatment planning. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  C. Burman,et al.  Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  G T Chen,et al.  Beams eye view-based photon radiotherapy I. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Daniel L. McShan,et al.  Integration of Multi-Modality Imaging for Use in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning , 1987 .

[20]  M Goitein,et al.  Calculation of normal tissue complication probability and dose-volume histogram reduction schemes for tissues with a critical element architecture. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  J. Lyman Complication Probability as Assessed from Dose-Volume Histograms , 1985 .

[22]  Mageras,et al.  Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. , 1992, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[23]  I. Rosen,et al.  Treatment plan optimization using linear programming. , 1991, Medical physics.

[24]  L M Chin,et al.  Sampling techniques for the evaluation of treatment plans. , 1993, Medical physics.

[25]  R K ten Haken,et al.  An application of dose volume histograms to the treatment of intrahepatic malignancies with radiation therapy. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  S. Webb Optimisation of conformal radiotherapy dose distributions by simulated annealing. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Sandler,et al.  Clinical Experience With Three-Dimensional Treatment Planning. , 1992, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[28]  A Brahme,et al.  Design principles and clinical possibilities with a new generation of radiation therapy equipment. A review. , 1987, Acta oncologica.

[29]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  A. Aisen,et al.  Integration of magnetic resonance imaging into radiation therapy treatment planning: I. Technical considerations. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  K. Winston,et al.  A system for stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator , 1988 .

[32]  R Mohan,et al.  Clinically relevant optimization of 3-D conformal treatments. , 1992, Medical physics.

[33]  R Mohan,et al.  A model for computer-controlled delivery of 3-D conformal treatments. , 1992, Medical physics.

[34]  M. Goitein,et al.  Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[36]  B. Nordell,et al.  Computer assisted dosimetry of scanned electron and photon beams for radiation therapy. , 1984, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[37]  M Goitein,et al.  Multi-dimensional treatment planning: I. Delineation of anatomy. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  D L McShan,et al.  Boost treatment of the prostate using shaped, fixed fields. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[39]  R. Mohan,et al.  Histogram reduction method for calculating complication probabilities for three-dimensional treatment planning evaluations. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  S Webb Optimization of conformal radiotherapy dose distributions by simulated annealing: 2. Inclusion of scatter in the 2D technique. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  N. Barth,et al.  An inverse problem in radiation therapy. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[42]  G T Chen,et al.  Optimization of radical radiotherapy with beam's eye view techniques for non-small cell lung cancer. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  D L McShan,et al.  Three-dimensional treatment planning of astrocytomas: a dosimetric study of cerebral irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  The use of beam's eye view volumetrics in the selection of non-coplanar radiation portals. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[45]  R Mohan,et al.  A comprehensive three-dimensional radiation treatment planning system. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  A. Niemierko,et al.  Random sampling for evaluating treatment plans. , 1990, Medical physics.

[47]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Beam's eye view volumetrics: an aid in rapid treatment plan development and evaluation. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.