Implementing Safer Alternatives to Lithographic Cleanup Solvents to Protect the Health of Workers and the Environment

The use of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in lithographic printing cleanup is an environmental and occupational hazard. Regulations to reduce ambient ozone levels limited VOC emissions from lithographic cleanup operations and spurred the development of low-VOC alternatives. The purpose of this project was to promote the substitution of hazardous cleanup solvents with less toxic chemicals to protect the health of workers and the environment. A convenience sample of printers, employers, union, industry, and government representatives was constructed. Data regarding the lithographic printing work force and the use of cleanup solvents and alternatives were collected through: (1) work site walk-throughs, (2) a focus group, (3) key informant interviews, (4) a half-day workshop, and (5) demonstration projects. Overall, 66 individuals from 15 different print shops, 10 government agencies, the lithographic printing industry, and one printer's union participated in one or more aspects of the project. Printer inhalation exposure to hazardous cleanup solvents was prevalent and printers were not aware of safer alternatives. Employers should implement low-VOC, low-toxicity cleanup products in a timely manner to protect the health of printers and the environment. Use of low-VOC lithographic cleanup products does not mitigate the potential for printer dermal exposure and may carry safety and ergonomic implications. Lithographic cleanup solvent manufacturers should seek low-VOC ingredients that do not pose a dermal exposure hazard. Linking environmental and occupational health prevented the development of substitutes that would have introduced worker hazards and provided an opportunity to circumvent some of the inadequacies of the current occupational health regulatory apparatus. Governmental organizations should establish and maintain institutional interdisciplinary mechanisms to support these linkages.

[1]  Bryan J. Hubbell,et al.  Health-Related Benefits of Attaining the 8-Hr Ozone Standard , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  A. Freiburghaus,et al.  A glove with exceptional protective features minimizes the risks of working with hazardous chemicals , 1992, Contact dermatitis.

[3]  H. Drexler,et al.  Skin strain and its influence on systemic exposure to a glycol ether in offset printing workers , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  M. Key National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; occupational exposure to inorganic lead: request for comments and information; republication--NIOSH. Request for comments and information relevant to occupational exposure to inorganic lead. , 1997, Federal register.

[5]  H. Tsuruta PERCUTANEOUS ABSORPTION OF ORGANIC SOLVENTS , 1975 .

[6]  I. W. Bartlett,et al.  Substitution of Organic Solvent Cleaning Agents in the Lithographic Printing Industry , 1999 .

[7]  L. Mølhave,et al.  Acute and subacute symptoms among workers in the printing industry. , 1982, British journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  Roberta F. White,et al.  Solvents and neurotoxicity , 1997, The Lancet.

[9]  F. Dominici,et al.  Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987-2000. , 2004, JAMA.

[10]  J. O. Metzger,et al.  Lipids as renewable resources: current state of chemical and biotechnological conversion and diversification , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[11]  Anila Bello,et al.  Pollution Prevention—Occupational Safety and Health in Hospitals: Alternatives and Interventions , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[12]  K. Fong,et al.  N-hexane neuropathy in offset printers. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  Barbara Sattler,et al.  Hazard Communication: A Review of the Science Underpinning the Art of Communication for Health and Safety , 1997 .

[14]  M. Boeniger The significance of skin exposure. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  齊藤 宏之,et al.  海外研究紹介 Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene , 2011 .

[16]  Tze Wai Wong,et al.  Occupational Exposure to Mixtures of Organic Solvents Increases the Risk of Neurological Symptoms Among Printing Workers in Hong Kong , 2004, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[17]  S. Wakelin,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis from d‐limonene in a laboratory technician , 1998, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  S. Wakelin,et al.  D‐Limonene contact dermatitis from hand cleansers , 2003, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  H. Williams,et al.  Intervention implementation research: an exploratory study of reduction strategies for occupational contact dermatitis in the printing industry , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  Isoamyl Acetate SUMMARY OF DATA FOR CHEMICAL SELECTION , 2013 .

[21]  L. Langworthy COMMENTS OF THE UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP ON NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR OZONE: PROPOSED RULE , 2007 .

[22]  Chun-Ho Liu,et al.  Occupational Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds and Mitigation by Push‐Pull Local Exhaust Ventilation in Printing Plants , 2005, Journal of occupational health.

[23]  J. Sumpter,et al.  Environmentally persistent alkylphenolic compounds are estrogenic. , 1994, Endocrinology.

[24]  Development of an environmentally benign process for the production of fatty acid methyl esters. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[25]  M G Gressel,et al.  The control of press cleaning solvent vapors in a small lithographic printing establishment. , 1999, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.