Evaluation of Spatial Audio for Improving Change Detection on Large Screen Displays

In the context of military command and control operations, operators are under an incredible amount of pressure to perform time-sensitive tasks in a rapidly changing environment. When the task involves a large screen display, it is easy to miss a critical event due to the overabundance of information present. In the current task, we investigated the potential of a spatial auditory cue for improving performance on a command and control monitoring task. We found that for a change detection task on a large screen display, a localized auditory cue can provide a useful and salient method of alerting operators to a change on the display. Additionally, because a spatial audio cue contains information about the location off an event on the screen, it gives the operator a better chance of detecting and responding to relevant events as they occur. Since a spatialized cue alerts the operator to the location of importance, it provides an especially critical advantage in areas of the screen which are normally associated with lower rates of detection.

[1]  Paula J. Durlach,et al.  Detection of Icon Appearance and Disappearance on a Digital Situation Awareness Display , 2008 .

[2]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[3]  Robert S. Bolia,et al.  Aurally Aided Visual Search in Three-Dimensional Space , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[4]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Steve Strand,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edition , 2006 .

[6]  Michael A Riley,et al.  Individual and team susceptibility to change blindness. , 2010, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  J. Grimes On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .

[8]  Thomas Z. Strybel,et al.  Auditory Spatial Facilitation of Visual Search Performance: Effect of Cue Precision and Distractor Density , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  E. J. Mccormick,et al.  The use of auditory cues in a visual search task. , 1960 .

[11]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[12]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[13]  Paula J. Durlach,et al.  Change Blindness and Its Implications for Complex Monitoring and Control Systems Design and Operator Training , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  F L Wightman,et al.  Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Douglas S. Brungart,et al.  In-Flight Navigation Using Head-Coupled and Aircraft-Coupled Spatial Audio Cues , 2007 .

[18]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Current Approaches to Change Blindness , 2000 .

[19]  Joseph DiVita,et al.  Verification of the Change Blindness Phenomenon While Managing Critical Events on a Combat Information Display , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[20]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[21]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception , 2000, Nature.