Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences: An analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports

by analyzing the Impact Factor distributions of their journals. The distribution of the SCI journals corresponded with a distribution generally modeled by the negative bi-nomial distribution, whereas the SSCI distribution fit the Poisson distribution modeling random, rare events. Both Impact Factor distributions were positively skewed—the SCI much more so than the SSCI—indicating excess variance. One of the causes of this excess variance was that the journals highest in the Impact Factor in both JCRs tended to class in subject categories well funded by the National Institutes of Health. The main reason for the SCI Impact Factor distribution being more skewed than the SSCI one was that review journals defining disciplinary paradigms play a much more important role in the sciences than in the social sciences.

[1]  Walter Modell,et al.  CRC Handbook of Tables for Probability and Statistics , 1966 .

[2]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  M. Kendall.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[4]  Sheldon Miller.  Dictionary of Scientific Biography , 1981 .

[5]  Student.  An Explanation of Deviations from Poisson's Law in Practice , 1919 .

[6]  S. Begley.  Science journals artfully try to boost their rankings. , 2006, Wall Street journal.

[7]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical methods for research workers. Biological monographs and manuals. No. V. , 1950 .

[8]  D. Gale Johnson,et al.  A Rating of Graduate Programs. , 1970 .

[9]  Stephen J. Bensman.  The impact factor, total citations, and better citation mouse traps: A commentary , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Interview with Eugene Garfield , 2006 .

[11]  Stephen J. Bensman,et al.  Scientific and Technical Serials Holdings Optimization in an Inefficient Market: A LSU Serials Redesign Project Exercise , 1998 .

[12]  J M Cattell,et al.  A FURTHER STATISTICAL STUDY OF AMERICAN MEN OF SCIENCE. , 1910, Science.

[13]  J. Barnes,et al.  The Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation , 1984 .

[14]  W. Feller.  On a General Class of "Contagious" Distributions , 1943 .

[15]  E. Garfield.  Significant journals of science , 1976, Nature.

[16]  Stephen J. Bensman.  Probability distributions in library and information science: A historical and practitioner viewpoint , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  J. D. Bernal,et al.  The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference , 1948, Nature.

[18]  W. G. Cochran.  Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests , 1954 .

[19]  R. Monastersky.  The number that's devouring science , 2005 .

[20]  E. J. S.,et al.  Quantitative Plant Ecology , 1934, Nature.

[21]  K S Joseph,et al.  CMAJ's impact factor: room for recalculation. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[22]  T. Asfour,et al.  Facts & Figures , 1962, Contemporary Canadian Picture Books.

[23]  Stephen J. Bensman.  The Structure of the Library Market for Scientific Journals: The Case of Chemistry , 1996 .

[24]  E. Garfield.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[25]  Allan M. Cartter,et al.  An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education , 1966 .

[26]  B. Maher,et al.  Research-doctorate programs in the United States: continuity and change , 1996 .

[27]  N. Diamond,et al.  The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era , 1997 .

[28]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Is the ratio between number of citations and publications cited a true constant , 1976 .

[29]  John Martyn,et al.  An evaluation of British scientific journals , 1968 .

[30]  J. M. Elliott,et al.  Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates , 1971 .

[31]  Stephen J. Bensman.  Garfield and the impact factor , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  M. Greenwood,et al.  An Inquiry into the Nature of Frequency Distributions Representative of Multiple Happenings with Particular Reference to the Occurrence of Multiple Attacks of Disease or of Repeated Accidents , 1920 .

[33]  R. BRIGHTMAN,et al.  The Social Function of Science , 1939, Nature.

[34]  Maurice F. Tauber,et al.  A Guide to the Library of Congress Classification , 1973 .

[35]  W. J. Langford.  Statistical Methods , 1959, Nature.

[36]  Per Ottar Seglen,et al.  How representative is the journal impact factor , 1992 .

[37]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[38]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[39]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing , 1963 .

[40]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  THE SIGNIFICANT SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE APPEARS IN A SMALL CORE OF JOURNALS , 1996 .