Paying It Forward versus Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity

Generalized reciprocity is a widely recognized but little studied component of social capital in organizations. We develop a causal model of the multiple mechanisms that sustain generalized reciprocity in an organization, drawing together disparate literatures in the social, organizational, and biological sciences. We conduct the first-ever critical test of two key mechanisms: paying it forward and rewarding reputation. These are fundamentally different grammars of organizing, either of which could sustain a system of generalized reciprocity. In an organization, paying it forward is a type of organizational citizenship behavior OCB that occurs when members of an organization help third parties because they themselves were helped. Rewarding reputation is a type of OCB that occurs when peers monitor one another, helping those who help others and refusing to help those who do not. Using behavioral data collected from members of two organizational groups over a three-month period, we found that reputational effects were strongest in the short term but decayed thereafter. Paying it forward had stronger and more lasting effects. Dominant theories assume that rewarding reputation is the main cause of generalized reciprocity, but our analysis demonstrates that generalized reciprocity in an organization occurs for multiple reasons. We use the empirical findings to develop propositions about the mechanisms of generalized reciprocity in organizations and link these to management practices. Our study contributes to social exchange theory, macro-level prosocial behavior, OCB, positive organizational scholarship, and management.

[1]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[2]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  How Knowledge Transfer Impacts Performance: A Multi-Level Model of Benefits and Liabilities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[3]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Big‐B versus Big‐O: what is organizational about organizational behavior?* , 2001 .

[4]  Lynne Andersson,et al.  Doing Unto Others: The Reciprocity of Helping Behavior in Organizations , 2003 .

[5]  A. Bakker,et al.  Positive Emotions , 2011 .

[6]  Wayne E. Baker,et al.  Enabling Positive Social Capital in Organizations. , 2007 .

[7]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[8]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  Exploring Organizationally Directed Citizenship Behaviour: Reciprocity or 'It's my Job'? , 2004 .

[9]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[10]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  Alliance Constellations: A Social Exchange Perspective , 2002 .

[11]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[12]  A. Schram,et al.  Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment , 2006 .

[13]  E BakerWayne,et al.  Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation , 2014 .

[14]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[15]  R. Putman Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community, NY: Simon and Shuster, 2000, 541 p. , 2002 .

[16]  Serge Fdida,et al.  Networks of Excellence , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[17]  S. Cosslett,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimator for choice-based samples , 1981 .

[18]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity , 2005, Nature.

[19]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[20]  Sébastien Roch,et al.  Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Dufwenberg,et al.  Direct versus indirect reciprocity : An experiment , 2001 .

[22]  M. Greenberg A Theory of Indebtedness , 1980 .

[23]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[24]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[25]  G. Imbens,et al.  Efficient estimation and stratified sampling , 1996 .

[26]  D. DeSteno,et al.  Gratitude and Prosocial Behavior , 2006, Psychological science.

[27]  M. McCullough,et al.  Counting blessings versus burdens: an experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[29]  Guido W. Imbens,et al.  An efficient method of moments estimator for discrete choice models with choice-based sampling , 1992 .

[30]  M. Jensen The Role of Network Resources in Market Entry: Commercial Banks' Entry into Investment Banking, 1991–1997 , 2003 .

[31]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[32]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams , 2010 .

[33]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2000 .

[34]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  M. Hénaff,et al.  On the Norm of Reciprocity , 2010 .

[36]  E. Wenger,et al.  cultivating communities of practice , 2002 .

[37]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[38]  Corinne Bendersky,et al.  The Cost of Status Enhancement: Performance Effects of Individuals' Status Mobility in Task Groups , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[39]  S. Kay Give and take. , 2004, British journal of plastic surgery.

[40]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[41]  Laurence Prusak,et al.  In good company: how social capital makes organizations work , 2001, UBIQ.

[42]  F. D. de Waal Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  P. Blau,et al.  The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. , 1956 .

[44]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[45]  R. D. Alexander The biology of moral systems , 1989 .

[46]  FarajSamer,et al.  Why should i share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice , 2005 .

[47]  P. Blau The Dynamics Of Bureaucracy , 1955 .

[48]  D. Organ Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[49]  Christopher J. Meyer,et al.  Personal reputation in organizations: Two-study constructive replication and extension of antecedents and consequences , 2012 .

[50]  B. Greiner,et al.  Indirect Reciprocity in Cyclical Networks - An Experimental Study - , 2005 .

[51]  M. Bolino Citizenship and Impression Management: Good Soldiers or Good Actors? , 1999 .

[52]  Gary King,et al.  ReLogit: Rare Events Logistic Regression , 2003 .

[53]  D. Organ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time , 1997 .

[54]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[55]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team Description , 2012 .

[56]  Dennis W. Organ,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2015 .

[57]  C. Plott,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics Results , 2008 .

[58]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[60]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[61]  D. Bergeron,et al.  The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? , 2007 .

[62]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[63]  J. Dutton,et al.  Exploring positive relationships at work : building a theoretical and research foundation , 2007 .

[64]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans. , 2000, Science.

[65]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. , 1956 .

[67]  A. Isen,et al.  Duration of the effect of good mood on helping: "Footprints on the sands of time." , 1976 .

[68]  D. Swanson In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work , 2001 .

[69]  Robb Willer,et al.  Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior , 2008 .

[70]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Agenda Setting in Organizational Behavior , 1992 .

[71]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[72]  Scott W. Lester,et al.  Paying you back or paying me forward: understanding rewarded and unrewarded organizational citizenship behavior. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[74]  B. Meglino,et al.  Considering rational self-interest as a disposition: organizational implications of other orientation. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[75]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  Tony Lancaster,et al.  Efficient estimation and stratified sampling , 1996 .

[77]  Richard A. McDermott,et al.  Harnessing your staff's informal networks. , 2010, Harvard business review.

[78]  W. Hewitt It's My Job , 2009 .

[79]  Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison,et al.  Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Importance of the Employee's Perspective , 1994 .

[80]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  An experimental test of direct and indirect reciprocity in case of complete and incomplete information , 2000 .

[81]  J. Mueller,et al.  Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: a theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  Catherine Ryan Hyde Pay It Forward , 1999 .

[83]  L. Roberts Changing Faces: Professional Image Construction In Diverse Organizational Settings , 2005 .

[84]  David DeSteno,et al.  Gratitude as moral sentiment: emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. , 2010, Emotion.

[85]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Gender and Negotiation in the Small: Are Women (Perceived to Be) More Cooperative than Men? , 2008 .

[86]  Michael E. McCullough,et al.  An Adaptation for Altruism , 2008 .

[87]  M A Nowak,et al.  The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[88]  Nathan P. Podsakoff,et al.  Effects of organizational citizenship behaviors on selection decisions in employment interviews. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[89]  N. Miller,et al.  Positive mood and helping behavior: a test of six hypotheses. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[90]  Gary King,et al.  Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data , 2001, Political Analysis.

[91]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves , 2006 .

[92]  P. Ekeh,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. , 1975 .

[93]  A. Orders Cultivating communities of practice , 2013 .

[94]  T. R. Vaughan,et al.  Formal Theory in Sociology: Opportunity or Pitfall? , 1995 .

[95]  Adam M. Grant Give And Take: A Revolutionary Approach To Success , 2013 .

[96]  B. Fredrickson The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[97]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[98]  W. Güth,et al.  Trust and reciprocity in the investment game with indirect reward , 2000 .

[99]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.