Cultural emergence of combinatorial structure in an artificial whistled language

Speech sounds within a linguistic system are both categorical and combinatorial and there are constraints on how elements can be recombined. To investigate the origins of this combinatorial structure, we conducted an iterated learning experiment with human participants, studying the transmission of an artificial system of sounds. In this study, participants learn and recall a system of sounds that are produced with a slide whistle, an instrument that is both intuitive and non-linguistic. The system they are exposed to is the recall output of the previous participant. Transmission from participant to participant causes the system to change and become cumulatively more learnable and more structured. This shows that combinatorial structure can culturally emerge in an artificial sound system through iterated learning.

[1]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Origins and Learnability of Syllable Systems: A Cultural Evolutionary Model , 2001, Artificial Evolution.

[2]  C. F. Hockett.  The origin of speech. , 1960, Scientific American.

[3]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Theoretical and empirical evidence for the impact of inductive biases on cultural evolution , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Self-Organization in the Evolution of Speech , 2006, Oxford Studies in the Evolution of Language.

[5]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[6]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[7]  Bart de Boer,et al.  Self-organization in vowel systems , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[8]  Kenny Smith,et al.  Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning , 2010, Cognition.

[9]  S. Chiba,et al.  Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition , 1978 .

[10]  T. Deacon.  The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain , 1998 .

[11]  Susan Bowsfield.  The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain , 2004 .

[12]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[13]  E. B. Page.  Ordered Hypotheses for Multiple Treatments: A Significance Test for Linear Ranks , 1963 .

[14]  S. Kirby,et al.  The emergence of linguistic structure: an overview of the iterated learning model , 2002 .

[15]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  How Phonological Structures Can Be Culturally Selected for Learnability , 2005, Adapt. Behav..

[16]  W. Sandler,et al.  Phonological category resolution: A study of handshapes in younger and older sign languages* , 2009 .

[17]  Bart de Boer,et al.  Multi-Agent Simulations of the Evolution of Combinatorial Phonology , 2010, Adapt. Behav..

[18]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Recreating duality of patterning in the laboratory: a new experimental paradigm for studying the emergence of sublexical structure , 2010 .

[19]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Irit Meir,et al.  The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language , 2011, Natural language & linguistic theory.