Mode-of-use Innovation in Interactive Product Development

Background: Mode-of-use innovation, or the innovative means by which products may be used, is considered as one lever for design-driven innovation. The current study explored how the mode-ofuse concept may apply to state-of-the-art product interactions and enhance user experience, in turn providing opportunities for design-driven innovation within the interactive product space. Methods: As framework to explore the application of mode-of-use innovation in interactive experiences, we adopted taxonomy of interaction styles. Generic interaction styles in product experience were classified through two criteria; whether interaction supports explanatory or exploratory modes, and whether the product interface is discrete or composite. Adopting a researchthrough-design approach, two interactive mood lamps were designed, expressed as high-idelity prototypes and used as stimuli to evaluate product experience according to different interaction styles. Results: Results indicated that the touch-free magic interaction style, an interaction providing explorative and composite modes of interaction, was initially considered more innovative in terms of mode-of-use, possibly triggered by the novelty of the interaction. However participants also expressed negative experiences in touch-free magic interactions compared to explanatory modesof-use interactions due to poor haptic feedback and inability to intuitively understand the mode-ofuse. Conclusions: Implications for understanding how mode-of-use may be applied to interactive product design are finally discussed. Although more work is required to understand how best more novel explorative interactions may stimulate initial feelings of innovativeness, caution is required in providing mode-of-use innovations that allow opportunities for clear understanding of interaction as related to function feedback, mapping well onto user expectations.

[1]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Taking the best from a company history - designing with interaction styles , 2000, DIS '00.

[2]  Lucia Rampino,et al.  The Innovation Pyramid: A Categorization of the Innovation Phenomenon in the Product-design Field , 2011 .

[3]  Ben Lowe Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean , 2010 .

[4]  R. Lazarus Emotion and Adaptation , 1991 .

[5]  Pieter M. A. Desmet,et al.  Nine Sources of Product Emotion , 2011 .

[6]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[7]  Johan Redström,et al.  From use to presence: on the expressions and aesthetics of everyday computational things , 2002, TCHI.

[8]  P. Hekkert Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design , 2006 .

[9]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[10]  Pieter M. A. Desmet,et al.  Emotional Design; Application of a Research-Based Design Approach , 2007 .

[11]  Youn-kyung Lim,et al.  Interactivity Attributes for Expression-oriented Interaction Design , 2011 .

[12]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions , 2007, DPPI.

[13]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  P. Desmet,et al.  The Basis of Product Emotions , 2002 .

[15]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change , 2014, Design Issues.

[16]  K. Scherer,et al.  Appraisal processes in emotion. , 2003 .

[17]  R. Verganti Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: A Metamodel and a Research Agenda* , 2008 .

[18]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms , 1997, CHI.

[19]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions , 2000, DIS '00.

[20]  Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein,et al.  TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR EXPERIENCE-DRIVEN INNOVATION , 2012 .

[21]  James Self,et al.  Perceptions of product innovativeness and desirability , 2013 .

[22]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Emotional Experience and Interaction Design , 2008, Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction.

[23]  S. Fournier,et al.  Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies , 1998 .

[24]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Towards Generic Interaction Styles for Product Design , 2007, HCI.

[25]  Joep Frens,et al.  Designing for rich interaction : integrating form, interaction, and function , 2006 .