What is found positive in healthcare information and communication technology implementation?-the results of a nationwide survey in Finland.

OBJECTIVE Considerable expectations have been placed on information and communication technology (ICT) in improving the processes and quality of healthcare. Our purpose was to find out which element is found positive in healthcare ICT implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online questionnaire on e-Health implementation submitted to all Finnish public health service providers and a sample from the private sector included an open question about which the electronic working methods, systems, or applications have most positively influenced the fluency or quality of service processes. RESULTS The electronic health record was mentioned as an item that has positive influence by 52% of the respondents from the hospital districts, 27% of those from the primary healthcare centers, and 38% of those from the private providers. Digital radiology systems (including teleradiology) were mentioned by 52% of the hospital districts and 27% of the primary healthcare centers. The figures for digital laboratory systems (including telelaboratory) were 5% and 11%, respectively. The figures for teleradiology itself were 5% for the hospital districts and 15% for the primary healthcare centers; the figures for telelaboratory systems were 5% and 9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The specialized healthcare seem to experience intraorganizational electronic services integrated to the electronic health record, such as digital radiology and laboratory services as exerting a positive influence, whereas the primary healthcare find such influence from different functions such as interorganizational data exchange and telemedicine services. These might indicate where the efforts should be focused when implementing ICT in healthcare.

[1]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  David M. Liebovitz Health care information technology: a cloud around the silver lining? , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  J. Reponen Radiology as a part of a comprehensive telemedicine and eHealth network in Northern Finland , 2004, International journal of circumpolar health.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving safety with information technology. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Lawrence M. Fagan,et al.  Computer-based documentation: effect on parent and physician satisfaction during a pediatric health maintenance encounter. , 2005, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[6]  A. Ziv,et al.  Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Electronic Medical Record System: A Cognitive Task Analysis , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  J. Reponen,et al.  Extending a multimedia medical record to a regional service with electronic referral and discharge letters , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  Guy Paré,et al.  Impact of PACS on Dictation Turnaround Time and Productivity , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Hajime Harauchi,et al.  Time and flow study results before and after installation of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  J. Reponen Teleradiology: A Northern Finland Perspective , 2008 .

[11]  T. Cornford,et al.  Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration system , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[12]  U Engelmann,et al.  The integration of medical images with the electronic patient record and their web-based distribution. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[13]  M. Jiwa,et al.  Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice , 2006, BMC family practice.

[14]  W. Hersh,et al.  Health care information technology: progress and barriers. , 2004, JAMA.

[15]  Peggy Nygren,et al.  Physicians, Patients, and the Electronic Health Record: An Ethnographic Analysis , 2006, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[16]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Challenges to EHR Implementation in Electronic- Versus Paper-based Office Practices , 2008, Journal of general internal medicine.

[17]  E. J. Adam,et al.  Picture archiving and communication systems lead to sustained improvements in reporting times and productivity: results of a 5-year audit. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[18]  Stephen H Walsh The clinician's perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  I. Aas,et al.  A qualitative study of the organizational consequences of telemedicine , 2001, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

[21]  W. Hersh Medical informatics: improving health care through information. , 2002, JAMA.