Using Cyberinfrastructure to Enhance Product Dissection in the Classroom

Product dissection has been used successfully in a variety of ways to actively engage students in their learning; however, using product dissection in the classroom does have drawbacks: products, tools, and their upkeep can be costly, workspace and storage space can be difficult to obtain, and even the best crafted dissection assignments can end in chaos. Recent cyberinfrastructure initiatives being funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) have the potential to overcome many of these obstacles, and in this paper we discuss how Cyber-Infrastructure-Based Engineering Repositories for Undergraduates, or CIBER-U, is creating a cyberinfrastructure that will revolutionize product dissection activities, making them easier to implement in the classroom and broadening their appeal to larger audiences. CIBER-U combines product dissection activities at three universities with two digital design repositories, CAD modeling and animation, video, MediaWiki technology, multimedia, and undergraduate research experiences to enable cyberinfrastructure-based product dissection activities. This paper showcases the activities that have been developed and implemented over the past year as part of CIBER-U. Ongoing work is also discussed.

[1]  Ronald E. Barr,et al.  An Introduction to Engineering Through an Integrated Reverse Engineering and Design Graphics Project , 2000 .

[2]  Bruce Carlson,et al.  A Motivational First‐year Electronics Lab Course , 1997 .

[3]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[4]  Ra Callander,et al.  Teaching engineering design , 1972 .

[5]  John L. Schmalzel,et al.  The competitive assessment laboratory: introducing engineering design via consumer product benchmarking , 2003, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[6]  Diane L. Beaudoin,et al.  A Product and Process Engineering Laboratory for Freshmen , 1995 .

[7]  Jens E. Jorgensen,et al.  Product dissection-a tool for benchmarking in the process of teaching design , 1996, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE'96 26th Annual Conference.

[8]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Students connecting engineering fundamentals and hardware design: observations and implications for the design of curriculum and assessment methods , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[9]  S. Sheppard.  MECHANICAL DISSECTION: AN EXPERIENCE IN HOW THINGS WORK , 1996 .

[10]  John S. Lamancusa,et al.  Learning Engineering by Product Dissection , 1996 .

[11]  Margot Brereton.  The role of hardware in learning engineering fundamentals: An empirical study of engineering design and product analysis activity , 1999 .

[12]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Fundamentals and Applications of Reverse Engineering , 2007 .

[13]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Malking Connections to Engineering During the First Two Years , 1992, Proceedings. Twenty-Second Annual conference Frontiers in Education.

[14]  John S. Lamancusa,et al.  The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum , 1997 .

[15]  Hans Vossensteyn.  Trends and issues in higher education , 2006 .

[16]  M J Ackerman,et al.  The Visible Human Project , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Update On Impec: An Integrated First Year Engineering Curriculum At N.C. State University , 1997 .

[18]  James E. Groccia,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Students' Experiences in Two Instructional Formats of an Introductory Materials Science Course , 1997 .