Sourcing in Text Comprehension: a Review of Interventions Targeting Sourcing Skills

The process of using information about documents such as the author, genre, and date of publication while evaluating and interpreting those documents’ content was labeled “sourcing” in a seminal paper by Wineburg (Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73, 1991). Studies in various domains have adapted the term sourcing while referring to central reading skills in modern information societies. In this review, we discuss the concept of sourcing grounded in research from social psychology, information sciences, and text comprehension. Based on that, we reviewed 18 intervention studies in educational settings, in order to identify how sourcing was operationalized in the studies, the nature of the interventions, and how successful they were. The review shows that interventions for younger students emphasized source credibility, whereas interventions among older students also emphasized the role of sourcing in interpretation. None of the studies measured how students search for source features or specifically which features they attend to. Regarding the nature of the studies, the use of multiple partly conflicting documents was common, with that condition positively related to outcome measures. Another characteristic was the use of inquiry tasks. A majority of the studies do not apply findings from persuasion theory and information science indicating that credibility assessment requires effort and motivation. Future interventions should more strongly emphasize the relationship between sourcing and motivation.

[1]  Nell K. Duke,et al.  The Impact of Instruction in the WWWDOT Framework on Students’ Disposition and Ability to Evaluate Web Sites as Sources of Information , 2011, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Validity, Reliability, and Utility of the Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. , 2006 .

[3]  Miriam J. Metzger Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[4]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Information-problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Sarah K. Brem,et al.  Science on the Web: Student Evaluations of Scientific Arguments , 2001 .

[6]  R. Petty,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model , 2012 .

[7]  S. Barzilai,et al.  The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints , 2015 .

[8]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Toward a theory of documents representation. , 1999 .

[9]  Edward H. Behrman Teaching about language, power, and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy Teaching about language, power, and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy , 2006 .

[10]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Synergies: effects of source representation and goal instructions on evidence quality, reasoning, and conceptual integration during argumentation-driven inquiry , 2016 .

[11]  Avishag Reisman Reading Like a Historian: A Document-Based History Curriculum Intervention in Urban High Schools , 2012 .

[12]  Kathleen H Corriveau,et al.  Young children's selective trust in informants , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Epistemic evaluation and comprehension of web-source information on controversial science-related topics: Effects of a short-term instructional intervention , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Soo Young Rieh Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Tsafrir Goldberg,et al.  “Could They Do It Differently?”: Narrative and Argumentative Changes in Students’ Writing Following Discussion of “Hot” Historical Issues , 2011 .

[16]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information , 2002 .

[17]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process , 2008 .

[18]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension , 2010 .

[19]  J. Durlak How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. , 2009, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[20]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI) , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Disciplinary Literacy in History , 2015 .

[22]  KammererYvonne,et al.  Fostering secondary-school students' intertext model formation when reading a set of websites , 2016 .

[23]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Searching the Web for conflicting topics: Page and user factors , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Norwegian Law Students' Use of Multiple Sources While Reading Expository Texts. , 2002 .

[25]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Fostering students’ evaluation behaviour while searching the internet , 2013 .

[26]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Learning with Multiple Documents , 2012 .

[27]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[28]  Mark Felton,et al.  Reading and writing from multiple source documents in history: Effects of strategy instruction with low to average high school writers , 2010 .

[29]  Richard J. Paxton The Influence of Author Visibility on High School Students Solving a Historical Problem , 2002 .

[30]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[31]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents , 2014 .

[32]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Spontaneous Sourcing Among Students Reading Multiple Documents , 2013 .

[33]  Rolf A. Zwaan Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. , 1994 .

[34]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online , 2010 .

[35]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .

[36]  P. Alexander,et al.  Cognitive Affective Engagement Model of Multiple Source Use , 2017 .

[37]  Soo Young Rieh Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002 .

[38]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Managing, Understanding, Applying, and Creating Knowledge in the Information Age: Next-Generation Challenges and Opportunities , 2013 .

[40]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Multiple viewpoints increase students' attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Yoram Eshet-Alkalai,et al.  Sourcing while reading divergent expert accounts: Pathways from views of knowing to written argumentation , 2015 .

[42]  Michael B. W. Wolfe,et al.  Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts. , 2010, The British journal of educational psychology.

[43]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change , 1982 .

[44]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[45]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts. , 2007 .

[46]  J. Rouet,et al.  The Impact of Presentation Format, Task Assignment, and Prior Knowledge on Students' Comprehension of Multiple Online Documents , 2007 .

[47]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  Fostering secondary-school students' intertext model formation when reading a set of websites: The effectiveness of source prompts , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[48]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[49]  Charles Hulme,et al.  The science of reading: A handbook. , 2005 .

[50]  Sofie M. M. Loyens,et al.  INSTRUCTION BASED ON INQUIRY , 2010 .

[51]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Comprehending and Learning From Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners , 2012, Reading Research Quarterly.

[52]  M. Lundeberg,et al.  Metacognitive Aspects of Reading Comprehension: Studying Understanding in Legal Case Analysis. , 1987 .

[53]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Between Veritas and Communitas: Epistemic Switching in the Reading of Academic and Sacred History , 2012 .

[54]  C. Bazerman Physicists Reading Physics , 1985 .

[55]  R. Bromme,et al.  Is it believable when it's scientific? How scientific discourse style influences laypeople's resolution of conflicts , 2015 .

[56]  Susan Tancock,et al.  Successfully Promoting 21st Century Online Research Skills: Interventions in 5th-Grade Classrooms. , 2015 .

[57]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Teaching Fourth and Fifth Graders to Evaluate Information Sources During Text Comprehension , 2013 .

[58]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Authorial intentions and metaphor comprehension , 1991, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[59]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition Versus Integration , 1990 .

[60]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source Evaluation in Students' Construction of Meaning Within and Across Multiple Texts , 2009 .

[61]  Manoli Pifarré,et al.  Improving Information Problem Solving skills in Secondary Education through embedded instruction , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  S. Wineburg Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence , 1991 .

[63]  Jason L. G. Braasch,et al.  Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents , 2013 .

[64]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  The Public's Bounded Understanding of Science , 2014 .

[65]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  The Role of Sourcing in Discourse Comprehension , 2017 .

[66]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Sourcing in professional education: Do text factors make any difference? , 2016 .

[67]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. , 1999 .

[68]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Why attend to source information when reading online? The perspective of ninth grade students from two different countries , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[69]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: the roles of word-level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation , 2013 .

[70]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Improving vocational students’ consideration of source information when deciding about science controversies , 2016 .

[71]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[72]  Ivan K. Ash,et al.  Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks , 2009 .