Addressing Annotation Complexity: The Case of Annotating Ideological Perspective in Egyptian Social Media

Automatically detecting the stance of people toward political and ideological topics –namely their “Ideological Perspective”– from social media is a rapidly growing research area with a wide range of applications. Research in such a field faces several challenges among which is the lack of annotated corpora and associated guidelines for collecting annotations. The problem is even more pronounced in situations where there is no clear taxonomy for the common community perspectives and ideologies. The challenges are exacerbated when the communities where we need to gather these annotations are in a state of turmoil causing subjectivity and intimidation to be factors in the annotation process. Accordingly, we present the process for creating a robust and succinct set of guidelines for annotating “Egyptian Ideological Perspectives”. We collect social media data discussing Egyptian politics and develop an iterative feedback annotation framework refining the annotation task and associated guidelines attempting to circumvent both weaknesses. Our efforts lead to a significant increase in inter-annotator agreement measures from 75.7% to 92% overall agreement.

[1]  Walid Magdy,et al.  Content and Network Dynamics Behind Egyptian Political Polarization on Twitter , 2014, CSCW.

[2]  P. Converse The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[3]  Vincent Ng,et al.  Extra-Linguistic Constraints on Stance Recognition in Ideological Debates , 2013, ACL.

[4]  Philip Resnik,et al.  More than Words: Syntactic Packaging and Implicit Sentiment , 2009, NAACL.

[5]  Noah A. Smith,et al.  Shedding (a Thousand Points of) Light on Biased Language , 2010, Mturk@HLT-NAACL.

[6]  A. Siegel Tweeting Beyond Tahrir : Ideological Diversity and Political Intolerance in Egyptian Twitter Networks , 2014 .

[7]  Chris Callison-Burch,et al.  Ideological Perspective Detection Using Semantic Features , 2015, *SEMEVAL.

[8]  Swapna Somasundaran,et al.  Recognizing Stances in Ideological On-Line Debates , 2010, HLT-NAACL 2010.

[9]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Subgroup Detection in Ideological Discussions , 2012, ACL.

[10]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[11]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Identifying Opinion Subgroups in Arabic Online Discussions , 2013, ACL.

[12]  Vincent Ng,et al.  Predicting Stance in Ideological Debate with Rich Linguistic Knowledge , 2012, COLING.

[13]  P. Converse The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964) , 2006, The Nature of Belief Systems Reconsidered.

[14]  Wei-Hao Lin,et al.  Which Side are You on? Identifying Perspectives at the Document and Sentence Levels , 2006, CoNLL.