Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems

Prior research on digital ecosystems focuses on the focal firm (e.g., a platform owner) and its ecosystem governance. However, there is a dearth of literature examining the non-focal actor, that is, an ecosystem participant who is at the periphery of a digital ecosystem. This paper proposes a theoretical perspective of the non-focal firm's participation across digital ecosystems for cultivating its innovation habitat through capability search and redeem. Capability search involves the location of external capability deemed valuable for extending the firm's innovation habitat. Capability redeem refers to the firm's use of external capability to develop, distribute, and/or monetize its products and services. We generate and sensitize the proposed perspective in the context of Sony Ericsson's innovation habitat by interpreting the mobile device manufacturer's participation across four digital ecosystems (Visual Basic, Java, Digital Music, and Android). Our findings suggest that the non-focal actor cannot rely on a single ecosystem for addressing all relevant layers of innovation. It benefits from pursuing a pluralistic strategy, operating across digital ecosystems to avoid investing all efforts in the same ecosystem. The model of ecosystem capability search and redeem, which is a result of ideographic research explanation, extends current perspectives on digital ecosystems and contributes to the emerging literature in the digital age.

[1]  H. Tsoukas.  The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations , 1989 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[4]  Alfred Kieser,et al.  Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses-And How This Should Be Performed , 1994 .

[5]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[6]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[7]  Alfonso Montuori,et al.  Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm? , 1995 .

[8]  L. Lynn,et al.  Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework , 1996 .

[9]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[10]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[11]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[12]  B. Pentland.  Building Process Theory with Narrative: from Description to Explanation , 1999 .

[13]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[14]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[15]  B. Weddell.  Conserving living natural resources in the context of a changing world , 2002 .

[16]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  A. James,et al.  The sourcing of technological knowledge: Distributed innovation processes and dynamic change , 2003 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Methodology for Analyzing Web-Based Qualitative Data , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[22]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  The Power of Innomediation , 2003 .

[23]  Shin-Horng Chen.  Taiwanese IT firms’ offshore R&D in China and the connection with the global innovation network , 2004 .

[24]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  The Limits to Specialization: Problem Solving and Coordination in ‘Modular Networks’ , 2005 .

[25]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries , 2016 .

[26]  Kenneth R. Brousseau,et al.  El estilo de toma de decisiones del ejecutivo experimentado , 2006 .

[27]  Kieran Walsh.  Let a thousand flowers bloom , 2006, Medical education.

[28]  J. West,et al.  Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-Source Software , 2006 .

[29]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  The Ecology of Standards Processes: Insights from Internet Standard Making , 2006, MIS Q..

[30]  Benoît Demil,et al.  Neither Market nor Hierarchy nor Network: The Emergence of Bazaar Governance , 2006 .

[31]  Ron Adner.  Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[32]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[33]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[35]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Keith Walley,et al.  Coopetition: An Introduction to the Subject and an Agenda for Research , 2007 .

[37]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[38]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[39]  Rahul C. Basole.  Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem , 2008, 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business.

[40]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Distributed Innovation in Classes of Networks , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[41]  Joel West,et al.  The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities , 2008 .

[42]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Architectural knowledge in inter-organizational IT innovation , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Steve Fleetwood,et al.  The Ontology of Things, Properties and Powers , 2009 .

[44]  Shon R. Hiatt,et al.  From Pabst to Pepsi: The Deinstitutionalization of Social Practices and the Creation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2009 .

[45]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean , 2009 .

[46]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[47]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Turn to the material: Remote diagnostics systems and new forms of boundary-spanning , 2009, Inf. Organ..

[48]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[50]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Infrastructures : The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010 .

[51]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[52]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Lisen Selander,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 2010 TRANSFORMING ECOSYSTEM RELATIONSHIPS IN DIGITAL INNOVATION , 2017 .

[55]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2011 .

[56]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Digital Complementary Assets , 2011, ICIS.

[57]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Organizing Ecologies of Complex Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic structures of control and generativity in digital ecosystem service innovation: the cases of the Apple and Google mobile app stores , 2011 .

[59]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  The Dual Regimes of Digital Innovation Management , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[60]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[61]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[62]  Fredrik Svahn,et al.  Digital Product Innovation: Building Generative Capability through Architectural Frames , 2012 .

[63]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Platform Complexity: Lessons from the Music Industry , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[64]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[65]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution , 2013, MIS Q..