Paying Attention to Meaning

Several paradigms show that responses to one event compromise responses to a second event for around 500 ms. Such effects are generally attributed to attentional capacity limitations associated with processing information in the first event. In a task in which targets could be distinguished only by their meaning, we varied the semantic relationship between distractors and targets following at different lags. Semantic relatedness alone produced a classic attentional blink. We conclude by discussing how attention theory might best accommodate these new effects.

[1]  S. Tipper,et al.  Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[2]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  S. Scott,et al.  Specifying Executive Representations and processes in Number Generation Tasks , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  N. Moray.  Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[5]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[6]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Interacting Cognitive Subsystems: Modeling Working Memory Phenomena Within a Multiprocessor Architecture , 1999 .

[7]  M. Mattson,et al.  From words to meaning: A semantic illusion , 1981 .

[8]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Duncan.  Visual attention in mind and brain , 2000 .

[10]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains : Evidence from the attentional blink , 1999 .

[11]  W. Maki,et al.  Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual "cocktail party" effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Discrimination of threat cues without awareness in anxiety states. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[16]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. , 1998 .

[17]  Richard J. Brown.  Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[18]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .