Blogs and Social Network Sites as Activity Systems: Exploring Adult Informal Learning Process through Activity Theory Framework

This paper uses an Activity Theory framework to explore adult user activities and informal learning processes as reflected in their blogs and social network sites (SNS). Using the assumption that a web-based space is an activity system in which learning occurs, typical features of the components were investigated and each activity system then characterized. Data obtained from individual users of a blog (Naver) and a SNS (Cyworld) were analyzed at the individual level and extended into the social level. Based on the findings, commonalities and differences between blog and SNS activities were discussed and different types of the division of labor between the activity systems were identified. This paper furthermore suggests three dimensions of adult informal learning activities in Web 2.0 in terms of learning as (a) an acquisition process, (b) a reflection process, and (c) a practice-based community process. Therefore, its discussion helps advance the understanding of the potential value of using Web 2.0 applications for adult informal learning.

[1]  Young Park,et al.  Cyworld is my world: Korean adult experiences in an online community for learning , 2008, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[2]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[3]  Li-Shia Huang,et al.  The Influence of Reading Motives on the Responses after Reading Blogs , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Activity Theory As a Lens for Characterizing the Participatory Unit. , 2004 .

[5]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[6]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Why we blog , 2004, CACM.

[7]  N. Denzin,et al.  The discipline and practice of qualitative research [Introduction]. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed. , 2000 .

[8]  Cher Ping Lim,et al.  An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Weaving the texture of school change , 2008 .

[10]  J. Hamel,et al.  Case Study Methods , 1993 .

[11]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[12]  B. Wassell,et al.  Fostering Critical Engagement in Preservice Teachers: Incorporating Weblogs Into Multicultural Education , 2008 .

[13]  S. Barab,et al.  Using Activity Theory to Conceptualize Online Community and Using Online Community to Conceptualize Activity Theory , 2004 .

[14]  Reginald S. Lee,et al.  Cross-Case Analysis , 2006 .

[15]  Marsha Spiegelman,et al.  Incorporating Blogs into the Syllabus: Making Their Space a Learning Space , 2007 .

[16]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  Informal and Incidental Learning , 2001 .

[17]  J. Mezirow.  Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning , 1991 .

[18]  Mark Tennant,et al.  Understanding Adult Learners , 2020, Dimensions of Adult Learning.

[19]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Where Theory Meets Practice: A Case for an Activity Theory Based Methodology to Guide Computer System Design , 2001, INTERACT.

[20]  Reginald S. Lee,et al.  Case Study Methods , 2006 .

[21]  A. Margaryan,et al.  Applying activity theory to computer-supported collaborative learning and work-based activities in corporate settings , 2004 .

[22]  Paolo Freire.  Pedagogy of the oppressed, New York (Herder & Herder) 1970. , 1970 .

[23]  N. Selwyn.  Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning: a critical review , 2007 .

[24]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[25]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[26]  D. Schugurensky,et al.  The forms of informal learning: towards a conceptualization of the field , 2000 .

[27]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[28]  Cheri J. Simonds,et al.  I'll See You On “Facebook”: The Effects of Computer-Mediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learning, and Classroom Climate , 2007 .

[29]  D. Livingstone.  Adults' Informal Learning: Definitions, Findings, Gaps, and Future Research. NALL Working Paper #21. , 2001 .

[30]  Taejin Jung,et al.  Motivations and Self-Presentation Strategies on Korean-Based "Cyworld" Weblog Format Personal Homepages , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[31]  Young Park,et al.  Blogging for Informal Learning: Analyzing Bloggers' Perceptions Using Learning Perspective , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[32]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[33]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Activity Theory and the Utilisation of the Activity System according to the Mathematics Educational Community , 2009 .

[35]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[36]  Rebecca M. English,et al.  Facebook © Goes to College: Using Social Networking Tools to Support Students Undertaking Teaching Practicum , 2008 .

[37]  S. Ziegler,et al.  The (mis)education of Generation M , 2007 .

[38]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[39]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[40]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[41]  Mathias Lux,et al.  The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies , 2007, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[42]  Michael J. Bugeja.  Facing the Facebook. , 2006 .

[43]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology : A Project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology , 1996 .