The Livingstone 2 (L2) model-based diagnosis software is a reusable diagnostic tool for monitoring complex systems. In 2004, L2 was integrated with the JPL Autonomous Sciencecraft Experiment (ASE) and deployed on-board Goddard's Earth Observing One (EO-1) remote sensing satellite, to monitor and diagnose the EO-1 space science instruments and imaging sequence. This paper reports on lessons learned from this flight experiment. The goals for this experiment, including validation of minimum success criteria and of a series of diagnostic scenarios, have all been successfully net. Long-term operations in space are on-going, as a test of the maturity of the system, with L2 performance remaining flawless. L2 has demonstrated the ability to track the state of the system during nominal operations, detect simulated abnormalities in operations and isolate failures to their root cause fault. Specific advances demonstrated include diagnosis of ambiguity groups rather than a single fault candidate; hypothesis revision given new sensor evidence about the state of the system; and the capability to check for faults in a dynamic system without having to wait until the system is quiescent. The major benefits of this advanced health management technology are to increase mission duration and reliability through intelligent fault protection, and robust autonomous operations with reduced dependency on supervisory operations from Earth. The work-load for operators will be reduced by telemetry of processed state-of-health information rather than raw data. The long-term vision is that of making diagnosis available to the onboard planner or executive, allowing autonomy software to re-plan in order to work around known component failures. For a system that is expected to evolve substantially over its lifetime, as for the International Space Station, the model-based approach has definite advantages over rule-based expert systems and limit-checking fault protection systems, as these do not scale well. The model-based approach facilitates reuse of the L2 diagnostic software; only the model of the system to be diagnosed and telemetry monitoring software has to be rebuilt for a new system or expanded for a growing system. The hierarchical L2 model supports modularity and expendability, and as such is suitable solution for integrated system health management as envisioned for systems-of-systems.
[1]
P. Pandurang Nayak,et al.
Remote Agent: To Boldly Go Where No AI System Has Gone Before
,
1998,
Artif. Intell..
[2]
P. Pandurang Nayak,et al.
Back to the Future for Consistency-Based Trajectory Tracking
,
2000,
AAAI/IAAI.
[3]
Adam Sweet,et al.
Advanced Diagnostic System on Earth Observing One
,
2004
.
[4]
Adam Sweet,et al.
Lessons Learned from using a Livingstone Model to Diagnose a Main Propulsion System
,
2003
.
[5]
Mark Schwabacher,et al.
NASA integrated vehicle health management technology experiment for X-37
,
2002,
SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.
[6]
Steve Ankuo Chien,et al.
Autonomous Science on the EO-1 Mission
,
2003
.
[7]
P. Pandurang Nayak,et al.
A Model-Based Approach to Reactive Self-Configuring Systems
,
1996,
AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 2.
[8]
Edward Balaban,et al.
Propulsion IVHM technology experiment overview
,
2003,
2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8652).
[9]
Adam Sweet,et al.
Li vingstone Model -Based Diagnosis of Earth Observing One
,
2004
.