The use of laterally presented words in research into cerebral asymmetry: Is directional scanning likely to be a source of artifact?

[1]  Eleanor M. Saffran,et al.  Reading in deep dyslexia is not ideographic , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  J. Bradshaw.  Right-hemisphere language: Familial and nonfamilial sinistrals, cognitive deficits and writing hand position in sinistrals, and concrete-abstract, imageable-nonimageable dimensions in word recognition. A review of interrelated issues , 1980, Brain and Language.

[3]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  A word-naming deficit in nonfamilial sinistrals? Laterality effects of vocal responses to tachistoscopically presented letter strings , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. Day,et al.  Visual half-field word recognition as a function of syntactic class and imageability , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  B. Shanon.  Lateralization Effects in Response to Words and Non-Words , 1979, Cortex.

[6]  Thomas L. Jackson,et al.  Cerebral dominance assessed by object- and color-naming latencies: Sex and familial sinistrality effects , 1979, Brain and Language.

[7]  D. Hines.  Visual information processing in the left and right hemispheres , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Maryanne Martin.  Hemispheric asymmetries for physical and semantic selection of visually presented words , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Visual field differences in verbal tasks: Effects of task familiarity and sex of subject , 1978, Brain and Language.

[10]  R. Andrews.  Aspects of language lateralization correlated with familial handedness , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  J. Kershner,et al.  Nonverbal fixation control in young children induces a left-field advantage in digit recall , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Bihemispheric involvement in lexical decisions: Handedness and a possible sex difference , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  A. Young,et al.  Age-of-acquisition and recognition of nouns presented in the left and right visual fields: A failed hypothesis , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  S. Axelrod,et al.  Oral report of words and word approximations presented to the left or right visual field , 1977, Brain and Language.

[15]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Serial, parallel, or holistic identification of single words in the two visual fields? , 1977 .

[16]  J. Day,et al.  Right-hemisphere language processing in normal right-handers. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  E. Saffran,et al.  Reading without Phonology: Evidence from Aphasia , 1977 .

[18]  K. Rayner,et al.  Hemispheric specialization in reading and word recognition , 1977, Brain and Language.

[19]  D. Hines.  Difference's in Tachistoscopic Recognition Between Abstract and Concrete Words as a Function of Visual Half-Field and Frequency , 1977, Cortex.

[20]  D. Hines.  Recognition of verbs, abstract nouns and concrete nouns from the left and right visual half-fields , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  V. Florian,et al.  Evidence of minimal cerebral asymmetries for the processing of English words and American sign language in the congenitally deaf , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  I. Nachshon,et al.  Developmental aspects of visual hemifield differences in perception of verbal material , 1976, Brain and Language.

[23]  M. White.  Order of processing in visual perception. , 1976, Canadian journal of psychology.

[24]  Lillian Leiber.  Lexical decisions in the right and left cerebral hemispheres , 1976, Brain and Language.

[25]  W. H. Moore.  Bilateral tachistoscopic word perception of stutterers and normal subjects , 1976, Brain and Language.

[26]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  The Perception and Identification of Mirror-Reversed Patterns , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  F. Allard,et al.  Visual hemifield differences depend on typeface , 1976, Brain and Language.

[28]  H. B. Orenstein,et al.  Recognition of bilaterally presented words varying in concreteness and frequency: Lateral dominance or sequential processing? , 1976 .

[29]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Letter versus Dot Stimuli as Tools for “Splitting the Normal Brain with Reaction Time” , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  J. Rosen,et al.  Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation , 1975, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  H. Ellis,et al.  Recognition of abstract and concrete words presented in left and right visual fields. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  I. Nachshon,et al.  Dissociation of hemifield reaction time differences from verbal stimulus directionality. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  E. Scheerer.  Task requirement and hemifield asymmetry in tachistoscopic partial report performance. , 1974, Acta psychologica.

[34]  W. McKeever,et al.  Avowed, assessed, and familial handedness and differential hemispheric processing of brief sequential and non-sequential visual stimuli. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  J. R. Kershner,et al.  Dual functional hemispheric asymmetry in visual perception: effects of ocular dominance and postexposural processes. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  P. Merikle,et al.  Selective forward masking. , 1972, Canadian journal of psychology.

[37]  D. Hines.  Bilateral tachistoscopic recognitions of verbal and nonverbal stimuli. , 1972, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[38]  I. Nachshon,et al.  Visual field differences in reaction times to Hebrew letters , 1972 .

[39]  W. McKeever.  Lateral Word Recognition: Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral Presentation, Asynchrony of Bilateral Presentation, and Forced Order of Report , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  G. Sperling,et al.  Extremely Rapid Visual Search: The Maximum Rate of Scanning Letters for the Presence of a Numeral , 1971, Science.

[41]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Tachistoscopic hemifield effects with hemifield report. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[42]  P. Merikle,et al.  On the selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.

[43]  J L Bradshaw,et al.  Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  W. McKeever,et al.  Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performances obtained with simultaneous bilateral input. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  M. P. Bryden,et al.  Left-right differences in tachistoscopic recognition as a function of familiarity and pattern orientation. , 1970 .

[46]  M. White,et al.  Laterality differences in perception: a review. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Splitting the normal brain with reaction time , 1969 .

[48]  J. Orbach.  Differential recognition of Hebrew and English words in right and left visual fields as a function of cerebral dominance and reading habits , 1967 .

[49]  M. Bryden,et al.  A model for the sequential organization of behaviour. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[50]  M. Bryden.  Left-Right Differences in Tachistoscopic Recognition: Directional Scanning or Cerebral Dominance? , 1966, Perceptual and motor skills.

[51]  E. R. Harcum.  Visual hemifield differences as conflicts in direction of reading. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[52]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Differential Recognition of Tachistoscopically Presented English and Hebrew Words in Right and Left Visual Fields , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[53]  M. Bryden.  Tachistoscopic recognition, handedness, and cerebral dominance☆ , 1965 .

[54]  Harcum Er,et al.  Explanation of Mishkin and Forgays' result as a directional-reading conflict. , 1963 .

[55]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Handedness and Differential Perception of Verbal Stimuli in Left and Right Visual Fields , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[56]  E R HARCUM,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Reversals on Lateral Dominance in Word Recognition , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[57]  W. Heron,et al.  Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[58]  J. Orbach,et al.  Retinal locus as a factor in the recognition of visually perceived words. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[59]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Effect of altered central and peripheral visual field stimulation on correct recognition and visual evoked response. , 1979, The International journal of neuroscience.

[60]  J. L. Mcclelland.  Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Primary and Secondary Recognition in Reading , 1975 .

[62]  L. Katz,et al.  Laterality and reading proficiency. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  One Second of Reading. , 1972 .

[64]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Familiarity and method of report as determinants of tachistoscopic performance. , 1971 .

[65]  W. F. McKeever,et al.  Bilateral tachistoscopic word recognition as a function of hemisphere stimulated and interhemispheric transfer time. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  M. White.  Laterality Differences in Perception , 1969 .

[67]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.