Coreferential objects in German: Experimental evidence on reflexivity

While object coreference structures are possible in English, the equivalent German construction is marginal, and additionally seems not to obey Binding Condition B. Work on this thorny problem has been hindered by a lack of agreement about which structures are and are not grammatical, and by the unpredicted nature of some contrasts. We applied the methodology of magnitude estimation (Bard et al 1996) to produce replicable grammaticality data as a basis for further work and to test competing accounts. The data reveals that none of the previous accounts we consider is wholly adequate. We show that the phenomena can be economically accounted for by a range of violable grammatical constraints on surface structure such as the Law of Increasing Members together with a violable form of Binding Condition B. We argue that the most adequate way of allowing these constraints to interact is in a constraint weighting model (Keller 2000), and show how such a model can be tightly constrained by deriving the constraint weightings directly from the experimentally obtained judgements.

[1]  Günther Grewendorf,et al.  Aspekte der deutschen Syntax : eine Rektions-Bindungs-Analyse , 1991 .

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[3]  A. Sorace,et al.  MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION OF LINGUISTIC ACCEPTABILITY , 1996 .

[4]  Sanchez-Valencia The empirical base of linguistics. Grammaticality judgements and linguistic methodology , 1998 .

[5]  Carson T. Schütze The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology , 1998 .

[6]  T. Reinhart,et al.  Pronouns, Anaphors and Case , 1995 .

[7]  O. Behaghel Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. , 1909, Indogermanische Forschungen.

[8]  Silke Fischer On the Integration of Cumulative Effects into Optimality Theory , 2000 .

[9]  Pilar Barbosa,et al.  Is the best good enough? : optimality and competition in syntax , 1998 .

[10]  Jürgen Lenerz,et al.  Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen , 1977 .

[11]  M. Everaert The Syntax of Reflexivization , 1986 .

[12]  M. Rita Manzini,et al.  Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory , 1987 .

[13]  S. Levinson Pragmatic reduction of the Binding Conditions revisited , 1991, Journal of Linguistics.

[14]  Frank Keller,et al.  Gradience in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality , 2001 .

[15]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[16]  Marga Reis,et al.  Reflexivierung in deutschen A.c.I.-Konstruktionen: ein transformationsgrammatisches Dilemma , 1976 .

[17]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Pierre Pica On the Distinction between Argumental and non-argumental Anaphors , 1984 .

[19]  Beatrice Primus Selbst — Variants of a Scalar Adverb in German , 1992 .