Quantifying App Store Dynamics: Longitudinal Tracking of Mental Health Apps

Background For many mental health conditions, mobile health apps offer the ability to deliver information, support, and intervention outside the clinical setting. However, there are difficulties with the use of a commercial app store to distribute health care resources, including turnover of apps, irrelevance of apps, and discordance with evidence-based practice. Objective The primary aim of this study was to quantify the longevity and rate of turnover of mental health apps within the official Android and iOS app stores. The secondary aim was to quantify the proportion of apps that were clinically relevant and assess whether the longevity of these apps differed from clinically nonrelevant apps. The tertiary aim was to establish the proportion of clinically relevant apps that included claims of clinical effectiveness. We performed additional subgroup analyses using additional data from the app stores, including search result ranking, user ratings, and number of downloads. Methods We searched iTunes (iOS) and the Google Play (Android) app stores each day over a 9-month period for apps related to depression, bipolar disorder, and suicide. We performed additional app-specific searches if an app no longer appeared within the main search Results On the Android platform, 50% of the search results changed after 130 days (depression), 195 days (bipolar disorder), and 115 days (suicide). Search results were more stable on the iOS platform, with 50% of the search results remaining at the end of the study period. Approximately 75% of Android and 90% of iOS apps were still available to download at the end of the study. We identified only 35.3% (347/982) of apps as being clinically relevant for depression, of which 9 (2.6%) claimed clinical effectiveness. Only 3 included a full citation to a published study. Conclusions The mental health app environment is volatile, with a clinically relevant app for depression becoming unavailable to download every 2.9 days. This poses challenges for consumers and clinicians seeking relevant and long-term apps, as well as for researchers seeking to evaluate the evidence base for publicly available apps.

[1]  Molly E Waring,et al.  Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations , 2014, Translational behavioral medicine.

[2]  E. Chiauzzi,et al.  ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[3]  John Torous,et al.  Current research and trends in the use of smartphone applications for mood disorders , 2015 .

[4]  P. Sleight Debate: Subgroup analyses in clinical trials: fun to look at - but don't believe them! , 2000, Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine.

[5]  H. Christensen,et al.  A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Tools for Suicide Prevention , 2016, PloS one.

[6]  H. Christensen,et al.  Smartphones for Smarter Delivery of Mental Health Programs: A Systematic Review , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  S. Flatt,et al.  App-based psychological interventions: friend or foe? , 2015, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[8]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: an updated systematic assessment of content and tools , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[9]  A. Powell,et al.  Interrater Reliability of mHealth App Rating Measures: Analysis of Top Depression and Smoking Cessation Apps , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[10]  Mark Erik Larsen,et al.  Mobile Apps for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  M. Keshavan,et al.  Patient Smartphone Ownership and Interest in Mobile Apps to Monitor Symptoms of Mental Health Conditions: A Survey in Four Geographically Distinct Psychiatric Clinics , 2014, JMIR mental health.

[12]  J. L. Bender,et al.  Finding a Depression App: A Review and Content Analysis of the Depression App Marketplace , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.