Outcomes of a Universal Shared Reading Intervention by 2 Years of Age: The Let's Read Trial

BACKGROUND: Early shared reading and literacy promotion benefits have stimulated international interest in the development of early-years literacy-promotion programs despite limited evidence of effectiveness at a broader population level. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a population-based primary care literacy promotion intervention during the first 2 years of life improves early markers of subsequent literacy by 2 years of age. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cluster randomized controlled trial took place in 5 relatively disadvantaged areas in Melbourne, Australia. Infants attending their maternal and child health centers were recruited at age 1–2 months. The intervention (4–8, 12, and 18 months) comprised maternal and child health nurses modelling shared reading activities to parents, supported by parent information and free books. Outcomes (at 2 years) included expressive vocabulary (MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventory), communication (Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales), and home literacy environment (StimQ-Toddler). We analyzed the outcomes using random-effects (linear regression) models allowing for clustering. RESULTS: A total of 552 families (87.6%; 324 intervention and 228 control families) of 630 recruited families (66.5% response) were retained to outcome. A total of 97.3% of intervention parents received some (93.7% to all) of the intervention. At 2 years, the trial arms had similar vocabulary (adjusted mean difference: −2.0 [95% confidence interval: −6.2 to 2.2]; P = .36), communication (adjusted mean difference: 0.2 [95% confidence interval: −2.3 to 2.7]; P = .87), and home literacy (adjusted mean difference: −0.4 [95% confidence interval: −1.0 to 0.2]; P = .21). CONCLUSIONS: This universal literacy-promotion program was not beneficial in relatively disadvantaged communities by the age of 2 years and may be ineffective. Alternative interpretations may relate to program intensity, reach and/or sleeper effects. Definitive outcomes at 4 years are awaited.

[1]  B. Zuckerman,et al.  Reading aloud to children: the evidence , 2008, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[2]  M. Prior,et al.  Predicting Language at 2 Years of Age: A Prospective Community Study , 2007, Pediatrics.

[3]  Jay Belsky,et al.  Effects of Sure Start local programmes on children and families: early findings from a quasi-experimental, cross sectional study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  H. Rockette,et al.  Concurrent and predictive validity of parent reports of child language at ages 2 and 3 years. , 2005, Child development.

[5]  M. Silverstein,et al.  Pediatric Interventions to Support Reading Aloud: How Good is the Evidence? , 2004, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[6]  D. Altman,et al.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  B. Wade,et al.  Bookstart: A qualitative evaluation , 2003 .

[8]  Iman Sharif,et al.  Exposure to Reach Out and Read and vocabulary outcomes in inner city preschoolers. , 2002, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[9]  R. Lansdown From neurons to neighbourhoods: the science of early child development , 2001 .

[10]  A. Sandler The impact of a clinic-based literacy intervention on language development in inner-city preschool children , 2001 .

[11]  D. Phillips,et al.  From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development , 2000 .

[12]  J. Boucher,et al.  Relationships between symbolic play, functional play, verbal and non-verbal ability in young children. , 2000, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[13]  L. Lagasse,et al.  Literacy promotion in primary care pediatrics: can we make a difference? , 1999, Pediatrics.

[14]  Grover J. Whitehurst,et al.  Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention from Head Start through second grade. , 1999 .

[15]  P. High,et al.  Literacy Promotion for Hispanic Families in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 1999, Pediatrics.

[16]  G. Whitehurst,et al.  Child development and emergent literacy. , 1998, Child development.

[17]  L. Lagasse,et al.  Evaluation of a clinic-based program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines among low-income urban families with young children. , 1998, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[18]  Barry M. Prizant,et al.  Communicative, Social/Affective, and Symbolic Profiles of Young Children With Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders , 1998 .

[19]  C. Tamis-LeMonda,et al.  Assessing the Child's Cognitive Home Environment Through Parental Report; Reliability and Validity , 1996 .

[20]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Knowledge of storybooks as a predictor of young children's vocabulary. , 1996 .

[21]  Jo Weinberger,et al.  Literacy Goes to School: The Parents' Role in Young Children's Literacy Learning , 1996 .

[22]  A. Pellegrini,et al.  Joint Book Reading Makes for Success in Learning to Read: A Meta-Analysis on Intergenerational Transmission of Literacy , 1995 .

[23]  R. Atkinson,et al.  White hat bias: The need for authors to have the spin stop with them , 2010, International Journal of Obesity.

[24]  B. Prizant,et al.  CSBS DP manual : communication and symbolic behavior scales : developmental profile , 2002 .

[25]  B. Dreyer,et al.  The impact of a clinic-based literacy intervention on language development in inner-city preschool children. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[26]  Monique Sénéchal,et al.  A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies: the benefits of regular reading and dialogic reading , 2000 .

[27]  Geoffrey N. Masters,et al.  Mapping Literacy Achievement: Results Of The 1996 National School English Literacy Survey : Incorporating A Report On The Survey Principles, Procedures And Findings , 1997 .

[28]  T. Division Education quarterly review , 1993 .

[29]  Marie M. Clay,et al.  The early detection of reading difficulties , 1981 .

[30]  M. Clay Reading: The Patterning of Complex Behaviour , 1977 .