The Road to Open News: A Theory of Social Signaling in an Open News Production Community

ABSTRACT This study theorizes the role of social signals in overcoming the motivation, coordination, and integration challenges in a hybrid peer production community, WikiTribune. WikiTribune was a collaborative journalism project that combined elements of firm-based production with that of commons-based peer production. Empirical data (article metrics, project documentation, and user communications) was used to examine the first 18-months of building and developing the collaborative journalism platform and community. The study’s primary contribution is a social signaling model that extends the theory of commons-based peer production and presents three constructs that inform the socially productive behavior in these communities. These constructs (1) system signals, (2) normative signals, and (3) behavioral signals are theorized to shape user engagement through the different levels of project participation. The alignment/misalignment of these signals with project strategy produce positive or negative outcomes. The social signaling model seeks to explain how challenges are overcome and advantages leveraged in commons-based peer production, in both pure and hybrid forms.

[1]  P. Pavlou,et al.  Seeing Is Believing? How Including a Video in Fake News Influences Users’ Reporting the Fake News to Social Media Platforms , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  T. Tuunanen,et al.  Information Technology-Supported value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction via social interaction and resource integration in service systems , 2022, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  H. Su,et al.  Deriving Execution Effectiveness of Crowdfunding Projects from the Fundraiser Network , 2022, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  HanByeol Stella Choi,et al.  Effects of Online Crowds on Self-Disclosure Behaviors in Online Reviews: A Multidimensional Examination , 2022, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Weiquan Wang,et al.  Do Social Dominance-Based Faultlines Help or Hurt Team Performance in Crowdsourcing Tournaments? , 2022, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Ling Xue,et al.  Flourish or Perish? The Impact of Technological Acquisitions on Contributions to Open-Source Software , 2021, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Jordana J. George,et al.  Uncovering the Truth about Fake News: A Research Model Grounded in Multi-Disciplinary Literature , 2021, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Ka Chung Ng,et al.  The Effect of Platform Intervention Policies on Fake News Dissemination and Survival: An Empirical Examination , 2021, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  P. Pavlou,et al.  Cure or Poison? Identity Verification and the Posting of Fake News on Social Media , 2021, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Kathryn Brohman,et al.  The anatomy of ‘fake news’: Studying false messages as digital objects , 2021 .

[11]  Ping Wang,et al.  Connecting the Parts with the Whole: Toward an Information Ecology Theory of Digital Innovation Ecosystems , 2021, MIS Q..

[12]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Mitigating the Adverse Effect of Monetary Incentives on Voluntary Contributions Online , 2021, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Henner Gimpel,et al.  The Effectiveness of Social Norms in Fighting Fake News on Social Media , 2021, Journal of Management Information Systems.

[14]  Wietske van Osch,et al.  Idea Generation in Enterprise Social Media: Open versus Closed Groups and Their Network Structures , 2020, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  The Gender Bias Tug-of-War in a Co-creation Community: Core-Periphery Tension on Wikipedia , 2020, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Pankaj Setia,et al.  The Takeoff of Open Source Software: A Signaling Perspective Based on Community Activities , 2020, MIS Q..

[17]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Idea Convergence Quality in Open Innovation Crowdsourcing: A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2020, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Stefano Zacchiroli,et al.  ‘Open source has won and lost the war’: Legitimising commercial–communal hybridisation in a FOSS project , 2020, New Media Soc..

[19]  Laura Dobusch,et al.  Closing for the Benefit of Openness? The case of Wikimedia’s open strategy process , 2019 .

[20]  Zvi Reich,et al.  From “Trust Me” to “Show Me” Journalism , 2018 .

[21]  S. Nambisan,et al.  On open innovation, platforms, and entrepreneurship , 2018, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

[22]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Do We All Talk Before We Type?: Understanding Collaboration in Wikipedia Language Editions , 2018, OpenSym.

[23]  Kirstie McAllum Volunteers as Boundary Workers: Negotiating Tensions Between Volunteerism and Professionalism in Nonprofit Organizations , 2018, Management Communication Quarterly.

[24]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Voicing the Puppet: Accommodating Unresolved Institutional Tensions in Digital Open Practices , 2018 .

[25]  Yili Hong,et al.  Spillover Effects of Financial Incentives on Non-Incentivized User Engagement: Evidence from an Online Knowledge Exchange Platform , 2018, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Shane M. Greenstein,et al.  Do Experts or Crowd-Based Models Produce More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia , 2018, MIS Q..

[27]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  The Sustainability of Polycentric Information Commons , 2018, MIS Q..

[28]  Susan Gasson,et al.  Legitimate Peripheral Participation in Hybrid FOSS Community Innovation , 2018, HICSS.

[29]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  “Openness” with and without Information Technology: a framework and a brief history , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Dejan Lavbic,et al.  Improving information quality of Wikipedia articles with cooperative principle , 2017, Online Inf. Rev..

[31]  R. Whittington,et al.  Open Strategy: Dimensions, Dilemmas, Dynamics , 2017 .

[32]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Opening the floodgates: the implications of increasing platform openness in crowdfunding , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Vegard Kolbjørnsrud,et al.  Agency problems and governance mechanisms in collaborative communities , 2017 .

[34]  Martin Kornberger,et al.  The visible hand and the crowd: Analyzing organization design in distributed innovation systems , 2017 .

[35]  Aleksi Aaltonen,et al.  Cumulative Growth in User-Generated Content Production: Evidence from Wikipedia , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Aleksi Aaltonen,et al.  Building Governance Capability in Online Social Production: Insights from Wikipedia , 2015 .

[37]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Editorial: The Role of Information Systems in Enabling Open Innovation , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Lorraine Morgan,et al.  Exploring value networks: theorising the creation and capture of value with open source software , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Tanja Aitamurto,et al.  Open innovation in digital journalism: Examining the impact of Open APIs at four news organizations , 2013, New Media Soc..

[40]  András Kornai,et al.  Edit Wars in Wikipedia , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[41]  Yana Volkovich,et al.  When the Wikipedians Talk: Network and Tree Structure of Wikipedia Discussion Pages , 2011, ICWSM.

[42]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[43]  Coye Cheshire,et al.  Readers are not free-riders: reading as a form of participation on wikipedia , 2010, CSCW '10.

[44]  Hong Xu,et al.  Moderated Online Communities and Quality of User-Generated Content , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Sean W. Smith,et al.  Reputation and Reliability in Collective Goods , 2009 .

[46]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  How do firms make use of open source communities , 2008 .

[47]  Ida Schultz THE JOURNALISTIC GUT FEELING , 2007 .

[48]  Jörg Matthes,et al.  Trust in News Media , 2007, Commun. Res..

[49]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[50]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[51]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[52]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[54]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[55]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Mitigating Information Asymmetry to Achieve Crowdfunding Success: Signaling and Online Communication , 2021, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Carmen Marta Lazo,et al.  Information Quality and Trust: From Traditional Media to Cybermedia , 2019 .

[57]  Aakanksha Gaur,et al.  OPEN INNOVATION AS BUSINESS MODEL GAME CHANGER IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR , 2017 .

[58]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[59]  Oded Nov,et al.  The [Wikipedia] World is not flat: on the Organizational Structure of Online production Communities , 2014, ECIS.

[60]  P. Ziaie,et al.  Lifecycle-Based Evolution Of Features In Collaborative Open Production Communities: The Case Of Wikipedia , 2013, ECIS.

[61]  Stephane Lussier,et al.  New tricks: how open source changed the way my team works , 2004, IEEE Software.

[62]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .