A Comparison of Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling, Principal Components and Reciprocal Averaging for the Ordination of Simulated Coenoclines, and Coenoplanes

The use of nonmetric multidimensional scaling as an ordination method has been studied by the use of simulated coenoclines and coenoplanes. It was found that the method always produced better ordinations than principal components analysis and in most cases better than reciprocal averag- ing, providing the multidimensional scaling was calculated using a space of the same dimensions as the simulated data. For real data of which the dimensionality is unknown, the minimum spanning tree can provide a useful means of estimating this dimensionality. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling was also less susceptible to distortion of the ordination by single gradients of high beta diversity and two-gradient situations when each gradient is of a different beta diversity. A number of different similarity measures were evaluated for use in conjunction with nonmetric scaling and the cos theta coefficient was found to generally give good results. The use of a log transformation of the species values had a marginal effect while the use of a 'Manhattan' distance metric in ordination space produced inferior results.

[1]  M. Hill.  Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method , 1974 .

[2]  R. Shepard.  Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects , 1974 .

[3]  P. Jaccard.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .

[4]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. , 1962 .

[5]  M. Thorrington-Smith.  West Indian Ocean phytoplankton: a numerical investigation of phytohydrographic regions and their characteristic phytoplankton associations , 1971 .

[6]  J. Kruskal.  Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[7]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RECIPROCAL AVERAGING AND OTHER ORDINATION TECHNIQUES , 1977 .

[8]  M. Fasham,et al.  Analysis of the vertical and geographic distribution of the abundant species of planktonic ostracods in the North-east Atlantic , 1975, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[9]  N. Jardine,et al.  Two approaches to zoogeography: a study based on the distributions of butterflies, birds and bats in the Indo‐Australian area , 1968 .

[10]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  The Relationship Between Sample Similarity and Ecological Distance , 1973 .

[11]  F. N. David,et al.  Geological Factor Analysis , 1976 .

[12]  M. Angel.  Repeated samples from a deep midwater planktonic ostracod community , 1969 .

[13]  J. Gower,et al.  Minimum Spanning Trees and Single Linkage Cluster Analysis , 1969 .

[14]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Evaluation of Ordination Techniques , 1978 .

[15]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Ordination of Vegetation Samples by Gaussian Species Distributions , 1974 .

[16]  L. Orlóci.  Ordination by Resemblance Matrices , 1978 .

[17]  P. Schönemann,et al.  Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion , 1970 .

[18]  H. van Groenewoud,et al.  A Multivariate Ordering of Vegetation Data Based on Gaussian Type Gradient Response Curves , 1975 .

[19]  W. T. Williams,et al.  Data Transformations in Ecological Ordination: II. On the Meaning of Data Standardization , 1975 .

[20]  A. J. B. Anderson,et al.  Ordination Methods in Ecology , 1971 .

[21]  P. J. Lee.  Geological Factor Analysis , 1977 .

[22]  David C. Eades,et al.  The Inappropriateness of the Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Taxonomic Resemblance , 1965 .

[23]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[24]  R. Cassie.  Frequency Distribution Models in the Ecology of Plankton and Other Organisms , 1962 .

[25]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  Principal Component Ordination and Simulated Vegetational Data , 1970 .

[26]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[27]  R. Whittaker.  Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[28]  J. Gower.  Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis , 1966 .

[29]  J. M. A. Swan,et al.  An Examination of Some Ordination Problems By Use of Simulated Vegetational Data , 1970 .

[30]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[31]  M. Austin,et al.  The Problem of Non-Linearity in Ordination: Experiments with Two-Gradient Models , 1971 .

[32]  D. Kendall,et al.  Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences , 1971, The Mathematical Gazette.

[33]  I. Noy-Meir,et al.  Data Transformations in Ecological Ordination: I. Some Advantages of Non-Centering , 1973 .

[34]  Eli C. Minkoff,et al.  The Effects on Classification of Slight Alterations in Numerical Technique , 1965 .

[35]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Comparison of Ordination Techniques , 1972 .

[36]  J. Gower.  Multivariate Analysis and Multidimensional Geometry , 1967 .