Quantification and Minimization of Magnetic Susceptibility Artifacts on GRE Images

Purpose The purpose of this work was to determine the optimal imaging parameters for minimization of metallic susceptibility artifacts during gradient echo (GRE) imaging. Method We performed GRE imaging of titanium screws in a nickel-doped agarose gel phantom, systematically varying several parameters to characterize and quantify susceptibility artifacts. Results The greatest reduction in artifact size came from using a short TE; increasing the frequency matrix and decreasing the slice thickness also contributed substantially to reducing the artifact size. Whenever possible, implanted prostheses should be aligned with the main magnetic field to minimize artifact size. Parameters with negligible effect on artifact size included bandwidth, phase encode matrix, and field of view. Conclusion Radiologists can easily adjust the above parameters in their imaging protocols to improve GRE image quality in patients with implanted metallic devices.

[1]  J. Lewin,et al.  Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  V M Haughton,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  R. Alfidi,et al.  MR imaging in patients with metallic implants. , 1985, Radiology.

[4]  L E Olsson,et al.  Nickel-doped agarose gel phantoms in MR imaging. , 1991, Acta radiologica.

[5]  P Boesiger,et al.  Biopsy needle susceptibility artifacts , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  E R McVeigh,et al.  In vivo measurement of T*2 and field inhomogeneity maps in the human heart at 1.5 T , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  E. Melhem,et al.  MR imaging of soft tissues adjacent to orthopaedic hardware: techniques to minimize susceptibility artefact. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[8]  J. Reichenbach,et al.  Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient‐echo imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  M. Schnall,et al.  Conventional and fast spin‐echo MR imaging: Minimizing echo time , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  M. Moerland,et al.  Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  G M Bydder,et al.  The benefits of increasing spatial resolution as a means of reducing artifacts due to field inhomogeneities. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  K Farahani,et al.  Effect of field strength on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1990, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.