Application of the stationary wavelet transform to reduce power-line interference in atrial electrograms

The atrial electrical activity analysis is nowadays playing a key role to improve current knowledge about the mechanisms triggering and maintaining atrial arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation (AF). Indeed, the intra-atrial electrograms (EGMs) provide essential information to guide the prevailing cornerstone treatment of AF, i.e., catheter ablation. Bearing in mind that cardiac electro-physiology laboratories are plenty of technology, such a kind of operating rooms are a very adverse environment when it comes to avoid power-line interference in EGM recordings. However, the reduction ofthis nuisance signal deserves more attention. Thus, aimed at reducing powerline noise but, at the same time, preserving the original EGM morphology, a novel algorithm based on the stationary Wavelet transform (SWT) is proposed. To validate the method, 150 bipolar EGMs with 10 seconds in length have been synthesized with different noise levels. The original and denoised EGMs have then been compared by means of an adaptive signed correlation index (ASCI), computed both in time and frequency domains. The obtained results have shown improvements between 9% and 17% for the proposed method regarding a reference notch filtering. Consequently, this new algorithm may enable more reliable and truthful further analyses of atrial EGMs.

[1]  Olaf Dössel,et al.  Removing ventricular far-field signals in intracardiac electrograms during stable atrial tachycardia using the periodic component analysis. , 2015, Journal of electrocardiology.

[2]  Mark E. Anderson,et al.  Progress toward the prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation: A summary of the Heart Rhythm Society Research Forum on the Treatment and Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation, Washington, DC, December 9-10, 2013. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[3]  T. Arentz,et al.  Optimizing Signal Acquisition and Recording in an Electrophysiology Laboratory , 2013 .

[4]  Rakesh Latchamsetty,et al.  Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. , 2018, Annual review of medicine.

[5]  S. Nattel,et al.  The value of basic research insights into atrial fibrillation mechanisms as a guide to therapeutic innovation: a critical analysis. , 2016, Cardiovascular research.

[6]  Paul S Addison,et al.  Wavelet transforms and the ECG: a review , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[7]  Samuel J Asirvatham,et al.  Signals and Signal Processing for the Electrophysiologist: Part II: Signal Processing and Artifact , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[8]  Hans-Georg Stark,et al.  A stationary wavelet transform and a time-frequency based spike detection algorithm for extracellular recorded data , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Jacques M T de Bakker,et al.  The Pathophysiologic Basis of Fractionated and Complex Electrograms and the Impact of Recording Techniques on Their Detection and Interpretation , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[10]  David Gordon,et al.  Iterative Method to Detect Atrial Activations and Measure Cycle Length From Electrograms During Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Sudha Seshadri,et al.  50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study , 2015, The Lancet.

[12]  Douglas P. Zipes,et al.  Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease , 2012 .

[13]  Samuel J Asirvatham,et al.  Signals and signal processing for the electrophysiologist: part I: electrogram acquisition. , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[14]  U Schotten,et al.  Current controversies in determining the main mechanisms of atrial fibrillation , 2016, Journal of internal medicine.