A Systems Approach to Brain Tumor Treatment

Simple Summary Pronounced differences across individuals (interpatient variability) and cell–cell heterogeneity within a tumor (intratumoral heterogeneity) severely hinder effective brain tumor treatment. To overcome these challenges, a personalized precision medicine approach that considers the uniqueness of an individual patient’s tumor and its cellular composition is required. A systems biology approach is needed to develop a multiscale understanding of the mechanistic drivers of disease etiology and progression to realize this vision. A systems-level understanding of disease characteristics can facilitate precise patient stratification into clinically meaningful subtypes and inform on potential druggable targets that can enhance treatment. Here, we synthesize and review various methodologies that can be integrated into a framework designed to achieve a personalized precision medicine approach for treating brain tumors. Finally, we provide a practical example in the context of analyzing an individual glioblastoma (GBM) patient at various stages of disease progression. Abstract Brain tumors are among the most lethal tumors. Glioblastoma, the most frequent primary brain tumor in adults, has a median survival time of approximately 15 months after diagnosis or a five-year survival rate of 10%; the recurrence rate is nearly 90%. Unfortunately, this prognosis has not improved for several decades. The lack of progress in the treatment of brain tumors has been attributed to their high rate of primary therapy resistance. Challenges such as pronounced inter-patient variability, intratumoral heterogeneity, and drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier hinder progress. A comprehensive, multiscale understanding of the disease, from the molecular to the whole tumor level, is needed to address the intratumor heterogeneity resulting from the coexistence of a diversity of neoplastic and non-neoplastic cell types in the tumor tissue. By contrast, inter-patient variability must be addressed by subtyping brain tumors to stratify patients and identify the best-matched drug(s) and therapies for a particular patient or cohort of patients. Accomplishing these diverse tasks will require a new framework, one involving a systems perspective in assessing the immense complexity of brain tumors. This would in turn entail a shift in how clinical medicine interfaces with the rapidly advancing high-throughput (HTP) technologies that have enabled the omics-scale profiling of molecular features of brain tumors from the single-cell to the tissue level. However, several gaps must be closed before such a framework can fulfill the promise of precision and personalized medicine for brain tumors. Ultimately, the goal is to integrate seamlessly multiscale systems analyses of patient tumors and clinical medicine. Accomplishing this goal would facilitate the rational design of therapeutic strategies matched to the characteristics of patients and their tumors. Here, we discuss some of the technologies, methodologies, and computational tools that will facilitate the realization of this vision to practice.

[1]  Y. Saeys,et al.  Single-cell profiling of myeloid cells in glioblastoma across species and disease stage reveals macrophage competition and specialization , 2021, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Hambardzumyan,et al.  Macrophages and microglia: the cerberus of glioblastoma , 2021, Acta neuropathologica communications.

[3]  B. Kamińska,et al.  Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals functional heterogeneity of glioma-associated brain macrophages , 2021, Nature Communications.

[4]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Proteogenomic and metabolomic characterization of human glioblastoma. , 2021, Cancer cell.

[5]  Sui Huang Reconciling Non-Genetic Plasticity with Somatic Evolution in Cancer. , 2021, Trends in cancer.

[6]  N. Baliga,et al.  A single-cell based precision medicine approach using glioblastoma patient-specific models , 2021, bioRxiv.

[7]  S. Weiss,et al.  Single-cell chromatin accessibility profiling of glioblastoma identifies an invasive cancer stem cell population associated with lower survival , 2021, eLife.

[8]  E. McDonagh,et al.  Open Targets Platform: supporting systematic drug–target identification and prioritisation , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Mattia Forcato,et al.  Computational methods for the integrative analysis of single-cell data , 2020, Briefings Bioinform..

[10]  Krister Wennerberg,et al.  Exploration of databases and methods supporting drug repurposing: a comprehensive survey , 2020, Briefings Bioinform..

[11]  F. De Smet,et al.  Immunocompetent Mouse Models in the Search for Effective Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma , 2020, Cancers.

[12]  Cindy C. Guo,et al.  High-Spatial-Resolution Multi-Omics Sequencing via Deterministic Barcoding in Tissue , 2020, Cell.

[13]  P. Matthews,et al.  Single-Nucleus RNA-Seq Is Not Suitable for Detection of Microglial Activation Genes in Humans , 2020, Cell reports.

[14]  S. Leenstra,et al.  Multiomics profiling of paired primary and recurrent glioblastoma patient tissues , 2020, Neuro-oncology advances.

[15]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  ArchR: An integrative and scalable software package for single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis , 2020, bioRxiv.

[16]  F. Hindré,et al.  Targeting Tumor Associated Macrophages to Overcome Conventional Treatment Resistance in Glioblastoma , 2020, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[17]  Kok Siong Ang,et al.  A benchmark of batch-effect correction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data , 2020, Genome Biology.

[18]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data , 2020, bioRxiv.

[19]  D. Holtzman,et al.  Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[20]  S. Preissl,et al.  Single-cell multimodal omics: the power of many , 2020, Nature Methods.

[21]  Kerstin B. Meyer,et al.  BBKNN: fast batch alignment of single cell transcriptomes , 2019, Bioinform..

[22]  P. Mischel,et al.  Altered cellular metabolism in gliomas — an emerging landscape of actionable co-dependency targets , 2019, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  Arnold Kriegstein,et al.  The phenotypes of proliferating glioblastoma cells reside on a single axis of variation. , 2019, Cancer discovery.

[24]  L. Hood,et al.  Personalized, Precision, and N-of-One Medicine: A Clarification of Terminology and Concepts , 2019, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[25]  Zev A. Binder,et al.  Clinical Utility of Plasma Cell-Free DNA in Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Pilot Prospective Study , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  R. Jain,et al.  The blood–brain barrier and blood–tumour barrier in brain tumours and metastases , 2019, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  Weidong Tian,et al.  A novel approach to remove the batch effect of single-cell data , 2019, Cell Discovery.

[28]  Aviv Regev,et al.  A single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-Seq toolbox for fresh and frozen human tumors , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[29]  Mariella G. Filbin,et al.  An Integrative Model of Cellular States, Plasticity, and Genetics for Glioblastoma , 2019, Cell.

[30]  Hongyu Zhao,et al.  Next-generation sequencing in liquid biopsy: cancer screening and early detection , 2019, Human Genomics.

[31]  Jan Hoinka,et al.  Subpopulation Detection and Their Comparative Analysis across Single-Cell Experiments with scPopCorn. , 2019, Cell systems.

[32]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Current best practices in single‐cell RNA‐seq analysis: a tutorial , 2019, Molecular systems biology.

[33]  Lei Xie,et al.  Rational discovery of dual-indication multi-target PDE/Kinase inhibitor for precision anti-cancer therapy using structural systems pharmacology , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  Samuel Demharter,et al.  Joint analysis of heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq dataset collections , 2019, Nature Methods.

[35]  Bonnie Berger,et al.  Efficient integration of heterogeneous single-cell transcriptomes using Scanorama , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Zev A. Binder,et al.  Rapid and ultrasensitive digital PCR (dPCR) profiling of EGFRvIII in tumor cells and tissues , 2019, Neuro-oncology advances.

[37]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  Multiplexed detection of proteins, transcriptomes, clonotypes and CRISPR perturbations in single cells , 2019, Nature Methods.

[38]  Geng Chen,et al.  Single-Cell RNA-Seq Technologies and Related Computational Data Analysis , 2019, Front. Genet..

[39]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution , 2019, Science.

[40]  D. Pal,et al.  Serum biomarkers identification by iTRAQ and verification by MRM: S100A8/S100A9 levels predict tumor-stroma involvement and prognosis in Glioblastoma , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[41]  Jing Tang,et al.  DrugComb: an integrative cancer drug combination data portal , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  D. Chan,et al.  Cancer biomarker discovery and translation: proteomics and beyond , 2019, Expert review of proteomics.

[43]  Karolis Leonavicius,et al.  Multi-omics at single-cell resolution: comparison of experimental and data fusion approaches. , 2019, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[44]  R. Satija,et al.  Integrative single-cell analysis , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[45]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Liquid biopsy in central nervous system metastases: a RANO review and proposals for clinical applications , 2019, Neuro-oncology.

[46]  Andrew R. Leach,et al.  ChEMBL: towards direct deposition of bioassay data , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  P. Sanseau,et al.  Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations , 2018, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[48]  Trygve E Bakken,et al.  Single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes compared in matched cortical cell types , 2018, PloS one.

[49]  I. Shmulevich,et al.  Epigenetic profiling for the molecular classification of metastatic brain tumors , 2018, Nature Communications.

[50]  Christoph Hafemeister,et al.  Comprehensive integration of single cell data , 2018, bioRxiv.

[51]  Douglas A. Lauffenburger,et al.  Analysis of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Identifies Cell-Cell Communication Associated with Tumor Characteristics , 2018, Cell reports.

[52]  Costas D. Arvanitis,et al.  Mechanisms of enhanced drug delivery in brain metastases with focused ultrasound-induced blood–tumor barrier disruption , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Y. Chu,et al.  TLR2 Promotes Glioma Immune Evasion by Downregulating MHC Class II Molecules in Microglia , 2018, Cancer Immunology Research.

[54]  B. Haibe-Kains,et al.  Chromatin Blueprint of Glioblastoma Stem Cells Reveals Common Drug Candidates for Distinct Subtypes , 2018, bioRxiv.

[55]  Anders Isaksson,et al.  Four evolutionary trajectories underlie genetic intratumoral variation in childhood cancer , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[56]  Fuhui Long,et al.  An anatomic transcriptional atlas of human glioblastoma , 2018, Science.

[57]  M. Antoniewicz A guide to 13C metabolic flux analysis for the cancer biologist , 2018, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[58]  Till Acker,et al.  DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours , 2018, Nature.

[59]  T. Terasaki,et al.  Identification of blood biomarkers in glioblastoma by SWATH mass spectrometry and quantitative targeted absolute proteomics , 2018, PloS one.

[60]  Maximilian Diehn,et al.  Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. , 2018, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[61]  Leland S. Hu,et al.  Is the blood–brain barrier really disrupted in all glioblastomas? A critical assessment of existing clinical data , 2018, Neuro-oncology.

[62]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018 , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[63]  N. Baliga,et al.  Understanding the brain tumor microenvironment: Considerations to applying systems biology and immunotherapy , 2018, International Journal of Neurooncology.

[64]  S. Terry,et al.  Hypoxic Stress-Induced Tumor and Immune Plasticity, Suppression, and Impact on Tumor Heterogeneity , 2017, Front. Immunol..

[65]  Melissa F. Adasme,et al.  From malaria to cancer: Computational drug repositioning of amodiaquine using PLIP interaction patterns , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[66]  Richard A. Moore,et al.  Fate mapping of human glioblastoma reveals an invariant stem cell hierarchy , 2017, Nature.

[67]  Sui Huang,et al.  Extracting Intercellular Signaling Network of Cancer Tissues using Ligand-Receptor Expression Patterns from Whole-tumor and Single-cell Transcriptomes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[68]  Sam Angiuoli,et al.  Direct detection of early-stage cancers using circulating tumor DNA , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[69]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Massively-parallel single nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq , 2017, Nature Methods.

[70]  M. Bernaudin,et al.  M2 macrophages are more resistant than M1 macrophages following radiation therapy in the context of glioblastoma , 2017, Oncotarget.

[71]  H. Swerdlow,et al.  Large-scale simultaneous measurement of epitopes and transcriptomes in single cells , 2017, Nature Methods.

[72]  Sydney M. Shaffer,et al.  Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance , 2017, Nature.

[73]  Angela N. Brooks,et al.  A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles , 2017, Cell.

[74]  In-Hee Lee,et al.  Spatiotemporal genomic architecture informs precision oncology in glioblastoma , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[75]  Christina Curtis,et al.  A population genetics perspective on the determinants of intra-tumor heterogeneity. , 2017, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer.

[76]  B. Faubert,et al.  Analyzing Tumor Metabolism In Vivo , 2017 .

[77]  C. Ponting,et al.  Single-Cell Multiomics: Multiple Measurements from Single Cells , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[78]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Single-Cell-Based Analysis Highlights a Surge in Cell-to-Cell Molecular Variability Preceding Irreversible Commitment in a Differentiation Process , 2016, PLoS biology.

[79]  Stephen R. Piccolo,et al.  Systems Approaches to Cancer Biology. , 2016, Cancer research.

[80]  S. Venneti,et al.  Non-invasive metabolic imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine , 2016, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[81]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Cell Fate Decision as High-Dimensional Critical State Transition , 2016, bioRxiv.

[82]  A. Heimberger,et al.  Interrogating Metabolism in Brain Cancer. , 2016, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[83]  M. Provencio,et al.  Liquid biopsy based biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. , 2016, Translational lung cancer research.

[84]  Patrick J. Paddison,et al.  Causal Mechanistic Regulatory Network for Glioblastoma Deciphered Using Systems Genetics Network Analysis. , 2016, Cell systems.

[85]  A. Brandes,et al.  Relapsed Glioblastoma: Treatment Strategies for Initial and Subsequent Recurrences , 2016, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[86]  A. Viale,et al.  Evaluating Cancer of the Central Nervous System Through Next-Generation Sequencing of Cerebrospinal Fluid , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[87]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[88]  W. Reik,et al.  Single-cell epigenomics: powerful new methods for understanding gene regulation and cell identity , 2016, Genome Biology.

[89]  Charles H. Yoon,et al.  Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq , 2016, Science.

[90]  J. Locasale,et al.  The Warburg Effect: How Does it Benefit Cancer Cells? , 2016, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[91]  A. Palma,et al.  Metabolic/Proteomic Signature Defines Two Glioblastoma Subtypes With Different Clinical Outcome , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[92]  Feng Xu,et al.  Therapeutic target database update 2016: enriched resource for bench to clinical drug target and targeted pathway information , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[93]  Deng Pan,et al.  DGIdb 2.0: mining clinically relevant drug–gene interactions , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[94]  D. Hoon,et al.  Epigenomic landscape of melanoma progression to brain metastasis: unexplored therapeutic alternatives. , 2015, Epigenomics.

[95]  Salvatore Piscuoglio,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid-derived circulating tumour DNA better represents the genomic alterations of brain tumours than plasma , 2015, Nature Communications.

[96]  Patrick J. Paddison,et al.  CNS Anticancer Drug Discovery and Development Conference White Paper. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[97]  S. Niclou,et al.  Targeted Proteomics to Assess the Response to Anti-Angiogenic Treatment in Human Glioblastoma (GBM)* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[98]  Alexander R. Pico,et al.  Glioma Groups Based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT Promoter Mutations in Tumors. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[99]  J. Rich,et al.  Cancer stem cells in glioblastoma , 2015, Genes & development.

[100]  N. Navin,et al.  Advances and applications of single-cell sequencing technologies. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[101]  S. Quake,et al.  Brain tumor mutations detected in cerebral spinal fluid. , 2015, Clinical chemistry.

[102]  Deric M. Park,et al.  The Evidence of Glioblastoma Heterogeneity , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[103]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Single cell-derived clonal analysis of human glioblastoma links functional and genomic heterogeneity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[104]  M. Aghi,et al.  Molecularly targeted therapies for recurrent glioblastoma: current and future targets. , 2014, Neurosurgical focus.

[105]  W. Huber,et al.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 , 2014, Genome Biology.

[106]  J. Wilmott,et al.  DNA methylation and gene deletion analysis of brain metastases in melanoma patients identifies mutually exclusive molecular alterations. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[107]  T. Taxt,et al.  Multimodal imaging of gliomas in the context of evolving cellular and molecular therapies. , 2014, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[108]  O. Elemento,et al.  Cancer systems biology: embracing complexity to develop better anticancer therapeutic strategies , 2014, Oncogene.

[109]  S. Dudoit,et al.  Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[110]  Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  Epidemiologic and Molecular Prognostic Review of Glioblastoma , 2014, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[111]  T. Kiehl,et al.  Analysis of IDH mutation, 1p/19q deletion, and PTEN loss delineates prognosis in clinical low-grade diffuse gliomas. , 2014, Neuro-oncology.

[112]  Shawn M. Gillespie,et al.  Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma , 2014, Science.

[113]  M. Choti,et al.  Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Early- and Late-Stage Human Malignancies , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[114]  B. Lippitz,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases: the current evidence. , 2014, Cancer treatment reviews.

[115]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Identifying driver mutations in sequenced cancer genomes: computational approaches to enable precision medicine , 2014, Genome Medicine.

[116]  F. Gage,et al.  RNA-sequencing from single nuclei , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[117]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  EGFR phosphorylates tumor-derived EGFRvIII driving STAT3/5 and progression in glioblastoma. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[118]  Barbara Marte,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity , 2013, Nature.

[119]  M. Lewandowska,et al.  An Analysis of the Prognostic Value of IDH1 (Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1) Mutation in Polish Glioma Patients , 2013, Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.

[120]  David E. Anderson,et al.  Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Glioma: Friend or Foe? , 2013, Journal of oncology.

[121]  Sui Huang,et al.  Genetic and non-genetic instability in tumor progression: link between the fitness landscape and the epigenetic landscape of cancer cells , 2013, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[122]  Fang Wang,et al.  An Inhibitor of Mutant IDH1 Delays Growth and Promotes Differentiation of Glioma Cells , 2013, Science.

[123]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .

[124]  Michael Weller,et al.  Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma--are we there yet? , 2013, Neuro-oncology.

[125]  Xiujie Wang,et al.  Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in glioblastoma multiforme progression and therapeutic implications. , 2012, Experimental cell research.

[126]  Jae-Geun Yoon,et al.  High-Throughput Chemical Screens Identify Disulfiram as an Inhibitor of Human Glioblastoma Stem Cells , 2012, Oncotarget.

[127]  Matthew B. Callaway,et al.  MuSiC: Identifying mutational significance in cancer genomes , 2012, Genome research.

[128]  K. Polyak,et al.  Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[129]  S. Al-Sarraj,et al.  Receptor tyrosine kinase genes amplified in glioblastoma exhibit a mutual exclusivity in variable proportions reflective of individual tumor heterogeneity. , 2012, Cancer research.

[130]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[131]  Debyani Chakravarty,et al.  Intratumoral heterogeneity of receptor tyrosine kinases EGFR and PDGFRA amplification in glioblastoma defines subpopulations with distinct growth factor response , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[132]  Ludovic C. Gillet,et al.  Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[133]  G. Barnett,et al.  Management of recurrent brain metastasis after radiosurgery. , 2012, Progress in neurological surgery.

[134]  Naren L. Banik,et al.  Drug Resistance in Glioblastoma: A Mini Review , 2012, Neurochemical Research.

[135]  Rebecca A Betensky,et al.  Mosaic amplification of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase genes in glioblastoma. , 2011, Cancer cell.

[136]  Junmin Peng,et al.  Proteomics of gliomas: initial biomarker discovery and evolution of technology. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[137]  Takao Satou,et al.  Statin-induced apoptosis via the suppression of ERK1/2 and Akt activation by inhibition of the geranylgeranyl-pyrophosphate biosynthesis in glioblastoma , 2011, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[138]  C. Brennan,et al.  Molecular subclassification of diffuse gliomas: Seeing order in the chaos , 2011, Glia.

[139]  Klaus Pantel,et al.  Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[140]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[141]  Lei Shi,et al.  MiR-21 protected human glioblastoma U87MG cells from chemotherapeutic drug temozolomide induced apoptosis by decreasing Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and caspase-3 activity , 2010, Brain Research.

[142]  G. Mills,et al.  Future of personalized medicine in oncology: a systems biology approach. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[143]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[144]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[145]  Predrag Radivojac,et al.  Automated inference of molecular mechanisms of disease from amino acid substitutions , 2009, Bioinform..

[146]  O. Kallioniemi,et al.  High-Throughput Cell-Based Screening of 4910 Known Drugs and Drug-like Small Molecules Identifies Disulfiram as an Inhibitor of Prostate Cancer Cell Growth , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[147]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Cancer attractors: a systems view of tumors from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective. , 2009, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[148]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Non-genetic heterogeneity — a mutation-independent driving force for the somatic evolution of tumours , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[149]  G. Maira,et al.  Distinct pools of cancer stem-like cells coexist within human glioblastomas and display different tumorigenicity and independent genomic evolution , 2009, Oncogene.

[150]  J. Kuratsu,et al.  Possible involvement of the M2 anti‐inflammatory macrophage phenotype in growth of human gliomas , 2008, The Journal of pathology.

[151]  A. Pellín,et al.  Concurrent EGFR amplification and TP-53 mutation in glioblastomas. , 2007, Clinical neuropathology.

[152]  Cheng Li,et al.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[153]  T. Golub,et al.  Gene expression-based chemical genomics identifies rapamycin as a modulator of MCL1 and glucocorticoid resistance. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[154]  L. Ricci-Vitiani,et al.  Chemotherapy resistance of glioblastoma stem cells , 2006, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[155]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[156]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[157]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[158]  David Haussler,et al.  LS-SNP: large-scale annotation of coding non-synonymous SNPs based on multiple information sources , 2005, Bioinform..

[159]  L. D.,et al.  Brain tumors , 2005, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[160]  S. Anderson,et al.  Integration of Smad and Forkhead Pathways in the Control of Neuroepithelial and Glioblastoma Cell Proliferation , 2004, Cell.

[161]  Akira Yamaura,et al.  Molecular Classification and Survival Prediction in Human Gliomas Based on Proteome Analysis , 2004, Cancer Research.

[162]  Robert H. Singer,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization: past, present and future , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[163]  C. James,et al.  PTEN mutation, EGFR amplification, and outcome in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[164]  D. Louis,et al.  PTEN is a target of chromosome 10q loss in anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and PTEN alterations are associated with poor prognosis. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[165]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Localization of common deletion regions on 1p and 19q in human gliomas and their association with histological subtype , 1999, Oncogene.

[166]  Y. Shoshan,et al.  Molecular analysis of two putative tumour suppressor genes, PTEN and DMBT, which have been implicated in glioblastoma multiforme disease progression , 1998, Oncogene.

[167]  J. Rey,et al.  Allelic loss at 1p and 19q frequently occurs in association and may represent early oncogenic events in oligodendroglial tumors , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[168]  G. Barnett,et al.  MDM2 protein confers the resistance of a human glioblastoma cell line to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. , 1995, Oncogene.

[169]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Clonal expansion of p53 mutant cells is associated with brain tumour progression , 1992, Nature.

[170]  O. Warburg [Origin of cancer cells]. , 1956, Oncologia.