Opinions from Users Across the Lifespan about Fully Autonomous and Rideshare Vehicles with Associated Features

Fully autonomous vehicles have the potential to fundamentally transform the future transportation system. While previous research has examined individuals’ perceptions towards fully autonomous vehicles, a complete understanding of attitudes and opinions across the lifespan is unknown. Therefore, individuals’ awareness, acceptance, and preferences towards autonomous vehicles were obtained from 75 participants through interviews with three diverse groups of participants: 20 automotive engineering graduate students who were building an autonomous concept vehicle, 21 non-technical adults, and 34 senior citizens. The results showed that regardless of age, an individual’s readiness to ride in a fully autonomous vehicle and the vehicle’s requirements were influenced by the users’ understanding of autonomous vehicles. All of the engineering students understand what a fully autonomous vehicle is and this group was the most willing to ride especially compared to the seniors, where only half of the seniors knew what a fully autonomous vehicle is and 58.8% were not at all ready to ride one. The desire to have a manual control option or the ability to override the vehicle was common (90% of the engineering students, 95.2% of the adults, and 82.4% of the seniors), especially for individuals who reported not being ready to ride in a fully autonomous vehicle. The majority of all three groups of participants (85% of the engineering students, 81% of the adults, and 52.9% of the seniors) considered it essential that the vehicle should convey information about the vehicle’s status and intended behavior. Diagnostic information about the vehicle was desired by the engineering students (71.4%), who had a technical understanding of autonomous vehicles and current automotive related technologies. When autonomous vehicles are available, most participants anticipate preferring to use them as a rideshare service model (75% of the engineering students, 38% of the adults, and 27% of the seniors) rather than owning (5% of the engineering students, 19% of the adults, and 21% of the seniors) the autonomous vehicle themselves. Regarding the topic of sharing rides with strangers, both the automotive engineering students (90%) and the adults (52.6%) were comfortable with the idea of pooled rideshare in comparison to the seniors (29.4%). In future efforts, it will be important to include potential autonomous vehicle users of a wide age range as well as physical, cognitive, and visual abilities.

[1]  Earl W. Huff,et al.  Putting Older Adults in the Driver Seat: Using User Enactment to Explore the Design of a Shared Autonomous Vehicle , 2020, AutomotiveUI.

[2]  Anand R. Gopal,et al.  Describing the users: Understanding adoption of and interest in shared, electrified, and automated transportation in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[3]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  How do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Using revealed preference models to inform public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[4]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  Clusters of potential autonomous vehicles users according to propensity to use individual versus shared vehicles , 2019, Transport Policy.

[5]  Theocharis Amanatidis,et al.  Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: the autonomous vehicle acceptance model , 2019, IUI.

[6]  Wei Zhang,et al.  An interview study exploring Tesla drivers' behavioural adaptation. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Paul A. Jennings,et al.  Evaluating How Interfaces Influence the User Interaction with Fully Autonomous Vehicles , 2018, AutomotiveUI.

[8]  Joel M. Cooper,et al.  Cognitive Underpinnings of Beliefs and Confidence in Beliefs about Fully Automated Vehicles , 2018 .

[9]  Johnell O. Brooks,et al.  A user-centered design exploration of fully autonomous vehicles' passenger compartments for at-risk populations , 2018 .

[10]  Rico Krueger,et al.  Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles , 2016 .

[11]  Wenwen Zhang,et al.  Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach , 2015 .

[12]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[13]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Operations of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Fleet for Austin, Texas, Market , 2015 .

[14]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Predicting information technology usage in the car: towards a car technology acceptance model , 2012, AutomotiveUI.

[15]  Pei-Chun Chen,et al.  Applying the TAM to travelers' usage intentions of GPS devices , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  A. Adell New strategies in the search of antipsychotic drugs. , 2010, Current pharmaceutical design.

[17]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour , 2009, AutomotiveUI.

[18]  J. Brabyn,et al.  Vision and Driving Self‐Restriction in Older Adults , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[19]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[21]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[22]  J. Stutts Do Older Drivers with Visual and Cognitive Impairments Drive Less? , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[23]  N Moray,et al.  Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[24]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[25]  Krishna M. Gurumurthy,et al.  Modeling Americans’ autonomous vehicle preferences: A focus on dynamic ride-sharing, privacy & long-distance mode choices , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[26]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[27]  M. König,et al.  Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car , 2017 .

[28]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..