Development of a method to estimate organ doses for pediatric CT examinations.

PURPOSE To develop a method for estimating doses to primarily exposed organs in pediatric CT by taking into account patient size and automatic tube current modulation (ATCM). METHODS A Monte Carlo CT dosimetry software package, which creates patient-specific voxelized phantoms, accurately simulates CT exposures, and generates dose images depicting the energy imparted on the exposed volume, was used. Routine head, thorax, and abdomen/pelvis CT examinations in 92 pediatric patients, ranging from 1-month to 14-yr-old (49 boys and 43 girls), were simulated on a 64-slice CT scanner. Two sets of simulations were performed in each patient using (i) a fixed tube current (FTC) value over the entire examination length and (ii) the ATCM profile extracted from the DICOM header of the reconstructed images. Normalized to CTDIvol organ dose was derived for all primary irradiated radiosensitive organs. Normalized dose data were correlated to patient's water equivalent diameter using log-transformed linear regression analysis. RESULTS The maximum percent difference in normalized organ dose between FTC and ATCM acquisitions was 10% for eyes in head, 26% for thymus in thorax, and 76% for kidneys in abdomen/pelvis. In most of the organs, the correlation between dose and water equivalent diameter was significantly improved in ATCM compared to FTC acquisitions (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The proposed method employs size specific CTDIvol-normalized organ dose coefficients for ATCM-activated and FTC acquisitions in pediatric CT. These coefficients are substantially different between ATCM and FTC modes of operation and enable a more accurate assessment of patient-specific organ dose in the clinical setting.

[1]  C Hoeschen,et al.  Dose conversion coefficients for CT examinations of adults with automatic tube current modulation , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  W A Kalender,et al.  Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. , 1999, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Effect of X-ray Tube Parameters and Iodine Concentration on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Cerebral Pediatric and Adult CT Angiography: A Phantom Study , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Maryam Khatonabadi,et al.  The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams. , 2013, Medical physics.

[5]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Pediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT: organ dose estimation based on 42 patient models. , 2013, Radiology.

[6]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk for pediatric chest CT. , 2011, Radiology.

[10]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. , 2002, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Influence of z overscanning on normalized effective doses calculated for pediatric patients undergoing multidetector CT examinations. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Evaluation of a patient-specific Monte Carlo software for CT dosimetry. , 2009, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[14]  David R. Pickens,et al.  Patient-specific dose calculations for pediatric CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis , 2015, Pediatric Radiology.

[15]  T. Mulkens,et al.  Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. , 2005, Radiology.

[16]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography With 256-Slice Computed Tomography Scanners: Patient-Specific Assessment of Radiation Burden and Associated Cancer Risk , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography , 2008, European Radiology.

[18]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. , 2004, Radiology.

[20]  Maryam Khatonabadi,et al.  A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function. , 2012, Medical physics.

[21]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Size-specific, scanner-independent organ dose estimates in contiguous axial and helical head CT examinations. , 2014, Medical physics.

[22]  Walter Huda,et al.  Organ doses to adult patients for chest CT. , 2010, Medical physics.

[23]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Automatic exposure control in CT: the effect of patient size, anatomical region and prescribed modulation strength on tube current and image quality , 2014, European Radiology.

[24]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners. , 2010, Medical physics.

[25]  J. Boone,et al.  Dose equations for tube current modulation in CT scanning and the interpretation of the associated CTDIvol. , 2013, Medical physics.