Difference thresholds for intensity perception of whole-body vertical vibration: effect of frequency and magnitude.

Difference thresholds for seated subjects exposed to whole-body vertical sinusoidal vibration have been determined at two vibration magnitudes [0.1 and 0.5 ms(-2) root mean square (r.m.s.)] and at two frequencies (5 and 20 Hz). For 12 subjects, difference thresholds were determined using the up-and-down transformed response method based on two-interval forced-choice tracking. At both frequencies, the difference thresholds increased by a factor of five when the magnitude of the vibration increased from 0.1 to 0.5 ms(-2) r.m.s. The median relative difference thresholds, Weber fractions (deltaI/I), expressed as percentages, were about 10% and did not differ significantly between the two vibration magnitudes or the two frequencies. It is concluded that for the conditions investigated the difference thresholds for whole-body vibration are approximately consistent with Weber's Law. A vibration magnitude will need to be reduced by more than about 10% for the change to be detectable by human subjects; vibration measurements will be required to detect reductions of less than 10%.

[1]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Vibrotactile intensity discrimination measured by three methods. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  H Levitt,et al.  Use of a sequential strategy in intelligibility testing. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  S. S. Stevens.  Tactile vibration: dynamics of sensory intensity. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effects of stimulus duration on the amplitude difference limen for vibrotaction. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. Hollins,et al.  Adaptation-induced enhancement of vibrotactile amplitude discrimination: the role of adapting frequency. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[8]  M J Griffin,et al.  Difference thresholds for automobile seat vibration. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  M J Griffin,et al.  The effects of vibration frequency and direction on the location of areas of discomfort caused by whole-body vibration. , 1978, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  M. Morioka,et al.  Comparison of absolute thresholds for vibration at the fingertips and on the hand in two different postures , 2000 .

[11]  M. Griffin,et al.  Whole-body vibration perception thresholds , 1988 .

[12]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On the Effect of Practice and Motivation on the Threshold of Audibility , 1958 .

[13]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[14]  Toshisuke Miwa.  EVALUATION METHODS FOR VIBRATION EFFECT , 1968 .

[15]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  The frequency dependence of subjective reaction to vertical and horizontal whole‐body vibration at low magnitudes , 1988 .

[16]  R. T. Verrillo.  Subjective Magnitude Functions for Vibrotaction , 1970 .

[17]  Toshisuke Miwa.  EVALUATION METHODS FOR VIBRATION EFFECT:PART 4. MEASUREMENTS OF VIBRATION GREATNESS FOR WHOLE BODY AND HAND IN VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL VIBRATIONS , 1968 .

[18]  S. S. Stevens.  Tactile vibration: Change of exponent with frequency , 1968 .

[19]  S Maeda,et al.  A comparison of vibrotactile thresholds on the finger obtained with ISO type equipment and Japanese equipment. , 1997, Industrial health.