On the relation between person-oriented and subject-specific approaches

The necessity of using subject-specific data analysis of non-ergodic psychological processes is explained, emphasizing the difference between inter-individual and intra-individual variation. It is argued that subject-specific data analysis not only matches the principles underlying Developmental Systems Theory, but also enables testing of all principles of person-oriented theory. A new generalized perspective on measurement equivalence in subject-specific data analysis is introduced. The importance of computational optimal control of psychological processes within the context of subject-specific data analysis is emphasized. In closing, some broader aims of subject-specific data analysis are considered.

[1]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  The Relationship Between the Structure of Interindividual and Intraindividual Variability: A Theoretical and Empirical Vindication of Developmental Systems Theory , 2003 .

[2]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  Merging the Idiographic Filter With Dynamic Factor Analysis to Model Process , 2012 .

[3]  K. Newell,et al.  Individual pathways of change: Statistical models for analyzing learning and development. , 2010 .

[4]  P. Molenaar,et al.  Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences , 2009 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  P. Molenaar A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person Back Into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever , 2004 .

[7]  G. Birkhoff Proof of the Ergodic Theorem , 1931, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  E. J. Hannan,et al.  Multiple time series , 1970 .

[9]  P.C.M. Molenaar,et al.  Dynamic assessment and adaptive optimization of the psychotherapeutic process. , 1987 .

[10]  Peter C M Molenaar,et al.  Equivalent Dynamic Models , 2017, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  Robert Lickliter,et al.  Rethinking Epigenesis and Evolution in Light of Developmental Science , 2009 .

[12]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  Note on optimization of individual psychotherapeutic processes , 2010 .

[13]  Peter C M Molenaar,et al.  Testing all six person-oriented principles in dynamic factor analysis , 2010, Development and Psychopathology.

[14]  Gilbert Gottlieb,et al.  Individual development and evolution : the genesis of novel behavior , 2001 .

[15]  Sharon I. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Statistical Approaches to Mitigate Measurement Error in Dietary Intake Data Collected Using 24-hour Recalls and Food Records/Diaries , 2017 .

[16]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  Systems Methods for Developmental Research , 2015 .

[17]  D. Borsboom Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics , 2005 .

[18]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series , 1985 .

[19]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Organizing Heterogeneous Samples Using Community Detection of GIMME-Derived Resting State Functional Networks , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  H. Meinhardt Models of biological pattern formation , 1982 .

[21]  Daniel J Bauer,et al.  Matching method with theory in person-oriented developmental psychopathology research , 2010, Development and Psychopathology.

[22]  Peter C M Molenaar,et al.  Mapping Temporal Dynamics in Social Interactions With Unified Structural Equation Modeling: A Description and Demonstration Revealing Time-Dependent Sex Differences in Play Behavior , 2013, Applied developmental science.

[23]  Peter C M Molenaar,et al.  On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems: analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation. , 2008, Developmental psychobiology.

[24]  J. Ulbrecht,et al.  Personalized State-space Modeling of Glucose Dynamics for Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuously Monitored Glucose, Insulin Dose, and Meal Intake , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[25]  Joachim F. Wohlwill,et al.  The study of behavioral development , 2015 .

[26]  P. Molenaar,et al.  Some Behaviorial Science Measurement Concerns and Proposals , 2016, Multivariate behavioral research.

[27]  A. D. de Groot,et al.  Scientific personality diagnosis , 1954 .

[28]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems , 1985 .

[29]  R. Cattell The three basic factor-analytic research designs-their interrelations and derivatives. , 1952, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  P. Molenaar,et al.  Analyzing developmental processes on an individual level using nonstationary time series modeling. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[31]  P. Whittle Risk-sensitive linear/quadratic/gaussian control , 1981, Advances in Applied Probability.

[32]  E. Thelen,et al.  Development as a Dynamic System , 1992 .

[33]  Geon Ho Choe,et al.  Computational Ergodic Theory , 2005 .

[34]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Statistically evaluating person-oriented principles revisited , 2010, Development and Psychopathology.

[35]  Scott R. Robinson,et al.  Oxford handbook of developmental behavioral neuroscience , 2009 .