How Important Is Connectivity for Surface Water Fluxes? A Generalized Expression for Flow Through Heterogeneous Landscapes

How important is hydrologic connectivity for surface-water fluxes though heterogeneous floodplains, deltas, and wetlands? While significant for management, this question remains poorly addressed. Here we adopt spatial resistance averaging, based on channel and patch configuration metrics quantifiable from aerial imagery, to produce an upscaled rate law for discharge. Our model suggests that patch coverage largely controls discharge sensitivity, with smaller effects from channel connectivity and vegetation patch fractal dimension. However, connectivity and patch configuration become increasingly important near the percolation threshold and at low water levels. These effects can establish positive feedbacks responsible for substantial flow change in evolving landscapes (14-36%, in our Everglades case study). Connectivity also interacts with other drivers; flow through poorly connected hydroscapes is less resilient to perturbations in other drivers. Finally, we found that flow through heterogeneous patches is alone sufficient to produce non-Manning flow-depth relationships commonly observed in wetlands but previously attributed to depth-varying roughness.

[1]  J. Steiger,et al.  Considering river structure and stability in the light of evolution: feedbacks between riparian vegetation and hydrogeomorphology , 2015 .

[2]  Anne F. Lightbody,et al.  Prediction of velocity profiles and longitudinal dispersion in salt marsh vegetation , 2006 .

[3]  John L. Lumley,et al.  The structure of atmospheric turbulence , 1964 .

[4]  K. Gross,et al.  Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Steven M Gorelick,et al.  Effective permeability of porous media containing branching channel networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Doerthe Tetzlaff,et al.  Concepts of hydrological connectivity: Research approaches, pathways and future agendas , 2013 .

[7]  J. Harvey,et al.  Predicting outcomes of restored Everglades high flow: a model system for scientifically managed floodplains , 2017 .

[8]  J. Jawitz,et al.  Coupled local facilitation and global hydrologic inhibition drive landscape geometry in a patterned peatland , 2015 .

[9]  Paola Passalacqua,et al.  The Delta Connectome: A network-based framework for studying connectivity in river deltas , 2017 .

[10]  David A. Kaplan,et al.  Orientation matters: Patch anisotropy controls discharge competence and hydroperiod in a patterned peatland , 2012 .

[11]  L. Larsen,et al.  Modeling of hydroecological feedbacks predicts distinct classes of landscape pattern, process, and restoration potential in shallow aquatic ecosystems , 2011 .

[12]  John H. Cushman,et al.  A primer on upscaling tools for porous media , 2002 .

[13]  Mitul Luhar,et al.  From the blade scale to the reach scale: A characterization of aquatic vegetative drag , 2013 .

[14]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  Flow channeling in a single fracture as a two‐dimensional strongly heterogeneous permeable medium , 1989 .

[15]  H. Nepf,et al.  Prediction of velocity profiles and longitudinal dispersion in emergent salt marsh vegetation , 2005 .

[16]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[17]  Paola Passalacqua,et al.  Process connectivity in a naturally prograding river delta , 2017 .

[18]  Shu Guang Li,et al.  Stochastic Theory for Irregular Stream Modeling. II: Solute Transport , 1997 .

[19]  J. Crimaldi,et al.  Predicting bed shear stress and its role in sediment dynamics and restoration potential of the Everglades and other vegetated flow systems. , 2009 .

[20]  William Nardin,et al.  Optimum vegetation height and density for inorganic sedimentation in deltaic marshes , 2014 .

[21]  J. Jawitz,et al.  Doing ecohydrology backward: Inferring wetland flow and hydroperiod from landscape patterns , 2017 .

[22]  A. J. Desbarats,et al.  Spatial averaging of hydraulic conductivity in three-dimensional heterogeneous porous media , 1992 .

[23]  D. McKnight,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity and implications for ecosystem processes - Lessons from naked watersheds , 2017 .

[24]  L. Larsen,et al.  Linking metrics of landscape pattern to hydrological process in a lotic wetland , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  Harry L. Jenter,et al.  Drag coefficients for modeling flow through emergent vegetation in the Florida Everglades , 2004 .

[26]  E. Tabacchi,et al.  Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: A review of complementary approaches , 2007 .

[27]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Power Averaging for Block Effective Permeability , 1986 .

[28]  V. Voller,et al.  Natural processes in delta restoration: application to the Mississippi Delta. , 2011, Annual review of marine science.

[29]  L. Larsen,et al.  Directional connectivity in hydrology and ecology. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[30]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  Optimization Toolbox User's Guide , 1998 .

[31]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[32]  R. Schaffranek.  Section 1. Simulation of surface-water integrated flow and transport in two-dimensions: SWIFT2D user's manual , 2004 .

[33]  G. Marsily.  Quantitative Hydrogeology: Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers , 1986 .

[34]  J. Harvey,et al.  Relative Significance of Microtopography and Vegetation as Controls on Surface Water Flow on a Low-Gradient Floodplain , 2014, Wetlands.

[35]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[36]  B. O’Connor,et al.  Hydroecological factors governing surface water flow on a low‐gradient floodplain , 2009 .

[37]  H. Nepf,et al.  Interaction between neighboring vegetation patches: Impact on flow and deposition , 2014 .

[38]  M. Cohen,et al.  Reciprocal Biotic Control on Hydrology, Nutrient Gradients, and Landform in the Greater Everglades , 2011 .

[39]  Tim Covino,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity as a framework for understanding biogeochemical flux through watersheds and along fluvial networks , 2017 .

[40]  M. Cohen,et al.  Discharge Competence and Pattern Formation in Peatlands: A Meta-Ecosystem Model of the Everglades Ridge-Slough Landscape , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  C. L. Farmer,et al.  Upscaling: a review , 2002 .

[42]  P. Fulé,et al.  Restoration Ecology , 1987, Restoration & Management Notes.

[43]  H. Nepf,et al.  Flow patterns around two neighboring patches of emergent vegetation and possible implications for deposition and vegetation growth , 2015, Environmental Fluid Mechanics.

[44]  H. Olff,et al.  Long-distance interactions regulate the structure and resilience of coastal ecosystems. , 2015, Annual review of marine science.

[45]  L. Larsen,et al.  How Vegetation and Sediment Transport Feedbacks Drive Landscape Change in the Everglades and Wetlands Worldwide , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[46]  R. Kadlec.  Overland flow in wetlands: vegetation resistance. , 1990 .

[47]  Aldo Fiori,et al.  Upscaling of flow in heterogeneous porous formations: Critical examination and issues of principle , 2013 .

[48]  H. Nepf,et al.  Effects of Vegetation Density and Wetland Aspect Ratio Variation on Hydraulic Efficiency of Wetlands , 2016 .

[49]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .

[50]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  Hydraulic Resistance due to Aquatic Vegetation in Small Streams: Field Study , 2008 .

[51]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Effective, Equivalent, and Apparent Properties of Heterogeneous Media , 2001 .

[52]  J. Jawitz,et al.  Hydrologic controls on aperiodic spatial organization of the ridge–slough patterned landscape , 2016 .