Development and validity of a virtual street walkability audit tool for pedestrian route choice analysis—SWATCH

The link between street environment and pedestrian route choices remains a relatively understudied research topic, mainly due to the difficulty in collecting data. This research develops and tests the construct validity of a virtual audit tool of the street environment for route choice analysis of pedestrians with an aim to ease the burden of data collection process, while maintaining the quality of data. The research collected walking routes data from 178 individuals in Brisbane, Australia. Participants were asked to indicate the reasons for their chosen routes in a 16-item question measured on a 3-point Likert scale. Their responses as well as the literature inform the development of the tool (content validity), which contained 22 indicators that potentially influence route choice. The tool was applied to collect street environment data virtually using Google Street View for each street segment of the routes taken. The tool was also used to collect street environment data physically for 47 randomly selected street segments from all the segments forming the routes. The construct validity was tested by comparing indicator level scores between virtual and physical surveys using three statistical measures—i.e., % agreement, Kappa Coefficient, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. The results show that 90% of street environment indicators have an acceptable level of agreement, which justifies that the tool can validly be used to collect street environment data for route choice analysis. The methodological implication of this study is that scholars and local planners can use the tool to collect street environment data efficiently, effectively, and free of charge by using Google Street View.

[1]  H. Timmermans,et al.  A Model of Pedestrian Route Choice and Demand for Retail Facilities within Inner-City Shopping Areas , 2010 .

[2]  Duncan J Macfarlane,et al.  Objective assessment of walking environments in ultra-dense cities: development and reliability of the Environment in Asia Scan Tool--Hong Kong version (EAST-HK). , 2011, Health & place.

[3]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Online versus in-person comparison of Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) assessments: reliability of alternate methods , 2017, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[4]  John Morrall,et al.  Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians , 1985 .

[5]  Brian E Saelens,et al.  Work group I: Measures of the food and physical activity environment: instruments. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[6]  George Yannis,et al.  A GIS-based methodology for identifying pedestrians' crossing patterns , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[7]  John Zacharias,et al.  Pedestrian Behavior Pedestrian Behavior and Perception in Urban Walking Environments , 2001 .

[8]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Factors affecting transport privatization: An empirical analysis of the EU , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[9]  D. Garbrecht,et al.  Pedestrian Paths Through a Uniform Environment , 1971 .

[10]  Billie Giles-Corti,et al.  Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Kamruzzaman,et al.  Association between the built environment and children's independent mobility: A meta-analytic review , 2017 .

[12]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Self-knowledge: its limits, value, and potential for improvement. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  L. Frank,et al.  Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[14]  J. Hine,et al.  Travel, transport and energy implications of university-related student travel: A case study approach , 2015 .

[15]  A. Herring,et al.  Exploring Associations between Physical Activity and Perceived and Objective Measures of the Built Environment , 2007, Journal of Urban Health.

[16]  R. Buliung,et al.  The "path" not taken: exploring structural differences in mapped- versus shortest-network-path school travel routes. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[17]  D. Lamping,et al.  Development of a new measure of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: DEMQOL , 2006, Psychological Medicine.

[18]  George Yannis,et al.  A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour models , 2009 .

[19]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[20]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[21]  H. Miedema,et al.  Influence of environmental street characteristics on walking route choice of elderly people , 2009 .

[22]  Carlos Oliva Pretto,et al.  Calibration of a Pedestrian Route Choice Model with a Basis in Friction Forces , 2015 .

[23]  Takemi Sugiyama,et al.  Street network measures and adults' walking for transport: Application of space syntax. , 2016, Health & place.

[24]  Ayse Ozbil,et al.  Pedestrian route choice by elementary school students: the role of street network configuration and pedestrian quality attributes in walking to school , 2016 .

[25]  Ria Hutabarat Lo Walkability: what is it? , 2009 .

[26]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Efficiency of the EU regulation on greenhouse gas emissions in Italy: The hierarchical cluster analysis approach , 2017 .

[27]  Mirko Guaralda,et al.  Place making for innovation and knowledge-intensive activities: The Australian experience , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[28]  Clark McPhail,et al.  Using Film to Analyze Pedestrian Behavior , 1982 .

[29]  Mirko Guaralda,et al.  Societal integration that matters: Place making experience of Macquarie Park Innovation District, Sydney , 2017, City, Culture and Society.

[30]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Investigating the urban heat island effect of transit oriented development in Brisbane , 2018, Journal of Transport Geography.

[31]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Comparison of field and online observations for measuring land uses using the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) , 2016 .

[32]  S T Broyles,et al.  Development and reliability of an audit tool to assess the school physical activity environment across 12 countries. , 2015, International journal of obesity supplements.

[33]  Perver K. Baran,et al.  Does Intelligibility Affect Place Legibility? Understanding the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Evaluations of the Urban Environment , 2012 .

[34]  Piet H. L. Bovy,et al.  On Modelling Route Choice Sets in Transportation Networks: A Synthesis , 2009 .

[35]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Influence of the Built Environment on Pedestrian Route Choices of Adolescent Girls , 2015, Environment and behavior.

[36]  Asha Weinstein Agrawal,et al.  How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference , 2007 .

[37]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Correlates of Non-Concordance between Perceived and Objective Measures of Walkability , 2009, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[38]  Kamruzzaman,et al.  Self-proxy agreement and weekly school travel behaviour in a sectarian divided society , 2013 .

[39]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Ecological approaches in planning for sustainable cities: A review of the literature , 2014 .

[40]  Billie Giles-Corti,et al.  Neighborhood environmental factors correlated with walking near home: Using SPACES. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[41]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Peter Schantz,et al.  Methods for determining route distances in active commuting – Their validity and reproducibility , 2011 .

[43]  PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIOUR IN SYDNEY , 1989 .

[44]  Rebecca E. Lee,et al.  Concordance and Correlates of Direct and Indirect Built Environment Measurement among Minority Women , 2012, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[45]  J. Hine,et al.  Weekly activity-travel behaviour in rural Northern Ireland: differences by context and socio-demographic , 2011 .

[46]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Sampling of Alternatives for Route Choice Modeling , 2009 .

[47]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[48]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Indices of Pedestrian Behavior in Shopping Areas , 2014 .

[49]  P. Glover A comparison between domestic and international students’ trip characteristics: Evidence from an Australian university , 2011 .

[50]  Paul Stangl,et al.  Neighborhood design, connectivity assessment and obstruction , 2011 .

[51]  Jonas De Vos,et al.  The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior , 2012 .

[52]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Governance that matters: Identifying place-making challenges of Melbourne’s Monash Employment Cluster , 2017 .

[53]  Kamruzzaman,et al.  Commuting mode choice in transit oriented development: Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection , 2015 .

[54]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Modeling pedestrian shopping behavior using principles of bounded rationality: model comparison and validation , 2011, J. Geogr. Syst..

[55]  P. W. Bonsall Chapter 12 – Issues in survey planning and design , 1997 .

[56]  Carey Curtis,et al.  Institutional practices and planning for walking: A focus on built environment audits , 2015 .

[57]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Using Predicted Bicyclist and Pedestrian Route Choice to Enhance Mode Choice Models , 2016 .

[58]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[59]  Julien O. Teitler,et al.  Using Google Street View to audit neighborhood environments. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[60]  Francisco Escobar,et al.  Assessing Walking and Cycling Environments in the Streets of Madrid: Comparing On-Field and Virtual Audits , 2015, Journal of Urban Health.

[61]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Correspondence between objective and perceived walking times to urban destinations: Influence of physical activity, neighbourhood walkability, and socio-demographics , 2012, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[62]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research , 2004 .

[63]  Andrew T Kaczynski,et al.  Correspondence of perceived vs. objective proximity to parks and their relationship to park-based physical activity , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[64]  Hyungkyoo Kim Walking distance, route choice, and activities while walking: A record of following pedestrians from transit stations in the San Francisco Bay area , 2015 .

[65]  Perver K. Baran,et al.  Space Syntax and Walking in a New Urbanist and Suburban Neighbourhoods , 2008 .

[66]  Peter Aspinall,et al.  Development of the Scottish Walkability Assessment Tool (SWAT). , 2009, Health & place.

[67]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  A micro-level indexing model for assessing urbanecosystem sustainability , 2012 .

[68]  Antonio Páez,et al.  Mode choice of university students commuting to school and the role of active travel , 2013 .

[69]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Imputing relevant information from multi-day GPS tracers for retail planning and management using data fusion and context-sensitive learning , 2009 .

[70]  Sara Tilley,et al.  Using Virtual Street Audits to Understand the Walkability of Older Adults’ Route Choices by Gender and Age , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[71]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Travel by University Students in Virginia , 2011 .

[72]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Objective versus subjective measures of the built environment, which are most effective in capturing associations with walking? , 2010, Health & place.

[73]  Douglas K Miller,et al.  Assessing the built environment using omnidirectional imagery. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[74]  Zhishi Guo,et al.  Does the pedestrian environment affect the utility of walking? A case of path choice in downtown Boston , 2009 .

[75]  Andy P. Jones,et al.  Developing and testing a street audit tool using Google Street View to measure environmental supportiveness for physical activity , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[76]  Yiik Diew Wong,et al.  Influence of infrastructural compatibility factors on walking and cycling route choices , 2013 .

[77]  Kamruzzaman,et al.  Patterns of social capital associated with transit oriented development , 2014 .

[78]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[79]  Bronwen T. Taylor,et al.  Measuring the quality of public open space using Google Earth. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[80]  Johannes Brug,et al.  Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[81]  Willem van Mechelen,et al.  Children’s route choice during active transportation to school: difference between shortest and actual route , 2016, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[82]  Zhan Guo,et al.  Pedestrian Environment and Route Choice: Evidence from New York City and Hong Kong , 2013 .

[83]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment , 2007 .

[84]  Banihan Gunay,et al.  Using GIS to visualise and evaluate student travel behaviour , 2011 .

[85]  K. Lucas,et al.  Developing socially inclusive transportation policy: transferring the United Kingdom policy approach to the State of Victoria? , 2012 .

[86]  H. Badland,et al.  Can Virtual Streetscape Audits Reliably Replace Physical Streetscape Audits? , 2010, Journal of Urban Health.

[87]  F. Bull,et al.  Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[88]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Towards an urban quality framework: determining critical measures for different geographical scales to attract and retain talent in cities , 2016 .

[89]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Analyzing walking route choice through built environments using random forests and discrete choice techniques , 2017, Environment and planning. B, urban analytics and city science.

[90]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Modelling pedestrian go-home decisions: A comparison of linear and nonlinear compensatory, and conjunctive non-compensatory specifications , 2009 .

[91]  J. Salmon,et al.  Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[92]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Place quality in innovation clusters: An empirical analysis of global best practices from Singapore, Helsinki, New York, and Sydney , 2017 .

[93]  M Knapp,et al.  Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[94]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Walkable Route Perceptions and Physical Features , 2007 .

[95]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models , 2004 .

[96]  David Ogilvie,et al.  Are GIS-modelled routes a useful proxy for the actual routes followed by commuters? , 2015, Journal of transport & health.

[97]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[98]  Mirko Guaralda,et al.  Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper , 2016 .