An evaluation of survival of space maintainers: a six-year follow-up study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the median survival time of fixed and removable space maintainers related to age groups, gender, and their distribution in upper and lower dental arches. The adherence of patients to a periodic recall program and the success rate of different types of space maintainers related to different arches were also evaluated. This study included 663 patients aged between 4-15 years old that were treated between the years of 1997 and 2002. The patients were categorized into four main groups: lost to follow-up, failed, successful, and censored at the end of study. Three hundred forty-five space maintainers were considered lost to follow-up, 83 were considered failed, 206 successful, and 20 censored-at-end. The overall median survival time of the appliances was 6.51 months. Median survival time was 7.25 months in the 4-6 age group, 6.35 months in the 7-12 age group, and 7.0 months in the 13+ age groups. Median survival time was 5.76 months in girls and 7.11 months in boys. Median survival time of space maintainers was 7.17 months for maxilla and 6.69 months in the mandible. Median survival time was 5.25 months for space maintainers fabricated in both arches.

[1]  L. Rajab.  Clinical performance and survival of space maintainers: evaluation over a period of 5 years. , 2002, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[2]  K. Donly,et al.  Treatment planning for space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition. , 2001, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[3]  A. Kupietzky,et al.  Anterior esthetic fixed appliances for the preschooler: considerations and a technique for placement. , 2001, Pediatric dentistry.

[4]  M. Qudeimat,et al.  The use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department. , 1999, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[5]  M. Qudeimat,et al.  The longevity of space maintainers: a retrospective study. , 1998, Pediatric dentistry.

[6]  L. Rimondini,et al.  Survival of different types of space maintainers. , 1994, Pediatric dentistry.

[7]  Liebenberg Wh.  Long- and short-term space maintenance following the uprighting of molars: a case report. , 1994 .

[8]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Oxford handbook of clinical dentistry , 1991 .

[9]  J. A. Davies.  Dental restoration longevity: a critique of the life table method of analysis. , 1987, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[10]  J. Jasmin,et al.  Fabrication of a more durable fixed anterior esthetic appliance. , 1984, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[11]  B. Klapper,et al.  Esthetic anterior space maintenance. , 1983, Pediatric dentistry.

[12]  J Artun,et al.  Clinical efficiency of two different types of direct bonded space maintainers. , 1983, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[13]  R. Simonsen.  Space maintenance utilizing acid etch bonding. , 1978, Dental survey.

[14]  H. W. Sorenson,et al.  Space maintenance in a child dental care program. , 1975, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  A. Thylstrup,et al.  The life table method in clinical dental research. , 1975, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[16]  J M Steffen,et al.  An esthetic method of anterior space maintenance. , 1971, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[17]  P. Ngan.  MANAGING SPACE PROBLEMS: Author's response , 2000 .

[18]  W. Liebenberg.  Long- and short-term space maintenance following the uprighting of molars: a case report. , 1994, Quintessence international.

[19]  M. Almeida,et al.  Direct bonded space maintainers. , 1993, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[20]  G. Z. Wright,et al.  Direct bonding applied to space maintenance. , 1976, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[21]  J. Dean,et al.  Dentistry for the child and adolescent , 1974 .