The social media see-saw: Positive and negative influences on adolescents’ affective well-being

Social media use is nearly universal among US-based teens. How do daily interactions with social apps influence adolescents’ affective well-being? Survey self-reports (n = 568) portray social media use as predominantly positive. Exploratory principal component analysis further indicates that positive and negative emotions form orthogonal response components. In-depth interviews with a sub-sample of youth (n = 26), selected for maximum variation, reveal that affect experiences can be organized across four functional dimensions. Relational interactions contribute to both closeness and disconnection; self-expression facilitates affirmation alongside concern about others’ judgments; interest-driven exploration confers inspiration and distress; and browsing leads to entertainment and boredom, as well as admiration and envy. All interviewees describe positive and negative affect experiences across multiple dimensions. Analyses suggest the relationship between social technology usage and well-being—whether enhanced or degraded—is not confined to an “either/or” framework: the emotional see-saw of social media use is weighted by both positive and negative influences.

[1]  James Gray,et al.  Facebook Photo Activity Associated with Body Image Disturbance in Adolescent Girls , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  E. Diener,et al.  MEASURING QUALITY OF LIFE: ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND SUBJECTIVE INDICATORS , 1997 .

[3]  Steven Eggermont,et al.  "I don't want to miss a thing": Adolescents' fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents' social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  C. Willig Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology , 2001 .

[5]  Nicole Egbert,et al.  Communication Competence, Social Support, and Depression Among College Students: A Model of Facebook and Face-to-Face Support Network Influence , 2013, Journal of health communication.

[6]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens , 2015, New Media Soc..

[7]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Friend Networking Sites and Their Relationship to Adolescents' Well-Being and Social Self-Esteem , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[8]  Kaitlin M. Flannery,et al.  Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. , 2017, Journal of affective disorders.

[9]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[10]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Friending, IMing, and hanging out face-to-face: overlap in adolescents' online and offline social networks. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[11]  D. Boyd Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[12]  P. Best,et al.  Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review , 2014 .

[13]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[14]  J. Jonides,et al.  Facebook Use Predicts Declines in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Jason B. Colditz,et al.  Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among U.S. young adults , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[16]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media , 2009 .

[18]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[19]  Stephanie M. Reich Connecting Offline Social Competence to Online Peer Interactions , 2017 .

[20]  R. Emerson,et al.  Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes , 1995 .

[21]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress , 2004 .

[22]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[23]  Emily Weinstein,et al.  Digital stress: Adolescents’ personal accounts , 2016, New Media Soc..

[24]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  Disclosures about important life events on Facebook: Relationships with stress and quality of life , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Joanna C. Yau,et al.  Are the Qualities of Adolescents’ Offline Friendships Present in Digital Interactions? , 2017, Adolescent Research Review.

[26]  Stefanie Duguay,et al.  “He has a way gayer Facebook than I do”: Investigating sexual identity disclosure and context collapse on a social networking site , 2014, New Media Soc..

[27]  Igor Pantic,et al.  Online Social Networking and Mental Health , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  Dawn Y. Brinkley,et al.  The BlackBerry Project: The Hidden World of Adolescents' Text Messaging and Relations With Internalizing Symptoms. , 2015, Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence.

[29]  M. Moreno,et al.  "Facebook depression?" social networking site use and depression in older adolescents. , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[30]  D. Watson,et al.  Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: recurrent and emergent issues. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[31]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[32]  Hui-Tzu Grace Chou,et al.  "They Are Happier and Having Better Lives than I Am": The Impact of Using Facebook on Perceptions of Others' Lives , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Social Comparison 2.0: Examining the Effects of Online Profiles on Social-Networking Sites , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[35]  Edson C. Tandoc,et al.  Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing? , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  K. Davis Friendship 2.0: adolescents' experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. , 2012, Journal of adolescence.

[37]  N. Bradburn The structure of psychological well-being , 1969 .

[38]  E. Deci,et al.  On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  A Large-Scale Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis , 2017, Psychological science.

[40]  Candice L Odgers,et al.  Seven Fears and the Science of How Mobile Technologies May Be Influencing Adolescents in the Digital Age , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[41]  Kristen Wright,et al.  The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world , 2016, New Media Soc..

[42]  S. Stern Producing Sites , Exploring Identities : Youth Online Authorship , 2008 .

[43]  Peter Buxmann,et al.  Envy on Facebook: A Hidden Threat to Users' Life Satisfaction? , 2013, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[44]  R. Larsen,et al.  The experience of emotional well-being. , 1993 .

[45]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[46]  Toon W. Taris,et al.  The structure of occupational well-being: A study among Dutch teachers , 2004 .

[47]  Desmond Upton Patton,et al.  Internet banging: New trends in social media, gang violence, masculinity and hip hop , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..