The aim is to demonstrate how cyber-ethnography has become the most appropriate tool in reaching a definition of the virtual community. It is argued through the cyber-ethnographic examination of two virtual communities that, interpretative research methods traditionally associated with the social sciences enforce preconceived ideas and normative frameworks on to the virtual community. Cyber-ethnography allows a reflexive methodology to emerge, thus enabling the participants of virtual communities to define their own reality and perimeters. It is propounded that there are two elements to the virtual community. First, it is emphasized that a hybrid space is rapidly emerging that is neither absolutely physical or virtual. Through its convergence with the physical the virtual community's existence is apparent, though not unconditionally virtual. Secondly, the participants are depicted as having a transitory, unconditional relationship with the virtual community. That is; they will only participate for short periods when they require use of the resources that the virtual community has to offer.
[1]
C. Bell,et al.
The sociology of community
,
1974
.
[2]
E. Evans-Pritchard,et al.
Kinship And Marriage Among The Nuer
,
1951
.
[3]
Michael Benedikt,et al.
Cyberspace: First Steps
,
1991
.
[4]
G. A. Hillery.
Definitions of community : Areas of Agreement
,
1955
.
[5]
H. Gavron.
The Captive Wife
,
1966
.
[6]
Herbert J. Gans,et al.
The Urban Villagers
,
1962
.
[7]
H. Becker,et al.
Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance.
,
1964
.
[8]
Mark Dery,et al.
Escape Velocity: Cyberculture at the End of the Century
,
1996
.
[9]
Jacqueline Scherer.
Contemporary Community: Sociological Illusion or Reality
,
1972
.
[10]
David Thomas.
Old rituals for new space: rites de passage and William Gibson's cultural model of cyberspace
,
1991
.
[11]
E. Batutis.
Breaking out
,
1986
.