Efficient algorithms for accurate hierarchical clustering of huge datasets: tackling the entire protein space

Motivation: UPGMA (average linking) is probably the most popular algorithm for hierarchical data clustering, especially in computational biology. However, UPGMA requires the entire dissimilarity matrix in memory. Due to this prohibitive requirement, UPGMA is not scalable to very large datasets. Application: We present a novel class of memory-constrained UPGMA (MC-UPGMA) algorithms. Given any practical memory size constraint, this framework guarantees the correct clustering solution without explicitly requiring all dissimilarities in memory. The algorithms are general and are applicable to any dataset. We present a data-dependent characterization of hardness and clustering efficiency. The presented concepts are applicable to any agglomerative clustering formulation. Results: We apply our algorithm to the entire collection of protein sequences, to automatically build a comprehensive evolutionary-driven hierarchy of proteins from sequence alone. The newly created tree captures protein families better than state-of-the-art large-scale methods such as CluSTr, ProtoNet4 or single-linkage clustering. We demonstrate that leveraging the entire mass embodied in all sequence similarities allows to significantly improve on current protein family clusterings which are unable to directly tackle the sheer mass of this data. Furthermore, we argue that non-metric constraints are an inherent complexity of the sequence space and should not be overlooked. The robustness of UPGMA allows significant improvement, especially for multidomain proteins, and for large or divergent families. Availability: A comprehensive tree built from all UniProt sequence similarities, together with navigation and classification tools will be made available as part of the ProtoNet service. A C++ implementation of the algorithm is available on request. Contact: lonshy@cs.huji.ac.il

[1]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  New developments in the InterPro database , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Center CLICK: A Clustering Algorithm with Applications to Gene Expression Analysis , 2000, ISMB.

[3]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  Pfam: clans, web tools and services , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Ori Sasson,et al.  ProtoNet 4.0: A hierarchical classification of one million protein sequences , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  W. Fitch,et al.  Construction of phylogenetic trees. , 1967, Science.

[7]  Burkhard Rost,et al.  Domains, motifs and clusters in the protein universe. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[8]  Ori Sasson,et al.  Predicting fold novelty based on ProtoNet hierarchical classification , 2005, Bioinform..

[9]  Patrik D'haeseleer,et al.  How does gene expression clustering work? , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[11]  Ori Sasson,et al.  Functional annotation prediction: All for one and one for all , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[12]  E. Webb Enzyme nomenclature 1992. Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzymes. , 1992 .

[13]  Paul D. Thomas,et al.  On the quality of tree-based protein classification , 2005, Bioinform..

[14]  Peter B. McGarvey,et al.  UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters , 2007, Bioinform..

[15]  Michal Linial,et al.  A functional hierarchical organization of the protein sequence space , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  Michal Linial,et al.  ProtoBee: hierarchical classification and annotation of the honey bee proteome. , 2006, Genome research.

[17]  Robert Petryszak,et al.  The predictive power of the CluSTr database , 2005, Bioinform..

[18]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  UPGMA clustering revisited: A weight-driven approach to transitive approximation , 2006, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[19]  Dave Bridges,et al.  Cyclic nucleotide binding proteins in the Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa genomes , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[20]  P. Sneath The application of computers to taxonomy. , 1957, Journal of general microbiology.

[21]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Large scale hierarchical clustering of protein sequences , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids , 1998 .

[23]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[24]  F. Delsuc,et al.  Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  Michal Linial,et al.  A robust method to detect structural and functional remote homologues , 2004, Proteins.

[26]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships , 1958 .

[27]  D. Lipman,et al.  A genomic perspective on protein families. , 1997, Science.