A survey on minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in performing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. To evaluate the current level of acceptance and utility of this procedure a survey of 162 cardiothoracic surgeons was conducted. RESULTS Currently only 16% of surveyed surgeons performed more than 10 minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Most were less than 55 years old and in private practice. The majority predicted that it will be indicated in less than 25% of coronary artery bypass grafting cases and considered minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting a modification of existing techniques rather than investigational. Most believed exposure and stabilization of the coronary arteries on the beating heart to be the most challenging part and expressed concern with quality of the anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting is rapidly gaining acceptance in younger surgeons as techniques are improved. Despite concerns with adequacy of anastomosis the procedure is not considered investigational and follow-up is not rigorous.

[1]  K V Arom,et al.  Revascularization using angioplasty and minimally invasive techniques documented by thermal imaging. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Lytle Bw,et al.  Minimally invasive cardiac surgery. , 1996 .

[3]  F. Benetti,et al.  Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients. , 1991, Chest.

[4]  E. Buffolo,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  D. R. Gross,et al.  Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A New Method Using an Anterior Mediastinotomy , 1995, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[6]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  Port-access coronary artery bypass with cardioplegic arrest: acute and chronic canine studies. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  J. Akin,et al.  Safe and effective method of stabilization for coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  J. Ferguson,et al.  Revascularization therapy for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1995, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[9]  A. Galloway,et al.  Port-Access coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1997, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  B. Griffith,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  R. S. Mitchell,et al.  Port-access coronary artery bypass grafting: a proposed surgical method. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  R. Mohr,et al.  Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass--the pros and the cons. , 1993, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[13]  A. Galloway,et al.  Minimally invasive cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegic arrest: a closed chest technique with equivalent myocardial protection. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.