Selective versus Non-Selective Acquisition of Crowd-Solicited IoT Data and Its Dependability

With the widespread availability of built-in and nondedicated sensors, acquiring crowd-solicited Internet of Things (IoT) data has become possible and convenient via smart mobile devices. Ensuring the dependability of crowd- solicited IoT data is a grand challenge since potential threats originated by adversaries are inevitable. When IoT data is acquired via nondedicated sensors in an opportunistic or participatory manner, the users/sensing data providers are not given the choice to select sensing tasks based on the other participants in the vicinity. In this paper, we perform a thorough feasibility analysis of two possible data acquisition approaches for crowd-solicited IoT data: 1) A mobile edge-based approach, namely the Selective and Reputation-aware Recruitment (SRR) which enables sensing service providers to join a highly dependable community, 2) Cloud- based non-selective reputation-aware recruitment (NSR). The community selectiveness of sensing data providers is basically turning off the corresponding sensors in the mobile devices while having the rest of the sensor array remain on. We present a framework where the selectiveness can be handled at the IoT gateways as data service functions to bypass the communication latency with the cloud-based crowd- sensing platform, and taking advantage of edge- based computing power. Our feasibility study through simulations shows that dependable community selectiveness does not lead to significant energy savings while slight improvement of user and platform utilities indicate the possible viability of cloud-based non-selective data acquisition of crowd- solicited IoT data.

[1]  Francisco Javier Ruiz Piñar,et al.  Virtualization of residential IoT functionality by using NFV and SDN , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE).

[2]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Scalable privacy-preserving participant selection in mobile crowd sensing , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[3]  Sivan Toledo,et al.  VTrack: accurate, energy-aware road traffic delay estimation using mobile phones , 2009, SenSys '09.

[4]  Burak Kantarci,et al.  Social Behaviometrics for Personalized Devices in the Internet of Things Era , 2017, IEEE Access.

[5]  Xiaomin Zhu,et al.  Towards collaborative storage scheduling using alternating direction method of multipliers for mobile edge cloud , 2017, J. Syst. Softw..

[6]  Daqing Zhang,et al.  Sparse mobile crowdsensing: challenges and opportunities , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Medusa: a programming framework for crowd-sensing applications , 2012, MobiSys '12.

[8]  Burak Kantarci,et al.  Anchor-Assisted and Vote-Based Trustworthiness Assurance in Smart City Crowdsensing , 2016, IEEE Access.

[9]  Tao Li,et al.  Mobile Crowd Sensing via Online Communities: Incentive Mechanisms for Multiple Cooperative Tasks , 2017, 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS).

[10]  Jian Ma,et al.  QoI-aware energy-efficient participant selection , 2014, 2014 Eleventh Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON).

[11]  Deepak Ganesan,et al.  mCrowd: a platform for mobile crowdsourcing , 2009, SenSys '09.

[12]  Xi Fang,et al.  Incentive Mechanisms for Crowdsensing: Crowdsourcing With Smartphones , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Smartphones Based Crowdsourcing for Indoor Localization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Trustworthy Sensing for Public Safety in Cloud-Centric Internet of Things , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[15]  Reza Curtmola,et al.  Improving location reliability in crowd sensed data with minimal efforts , 2013, 6th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC).

[16]  Tom H. Luan,et al.  Queuing Algorithm for Effective Target Coverage in Mobile Crowd Sensing , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[17]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Incentives for Mobile Crowd Sensing: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[18]  Luciano Bononi,et al.  A Collaborative Internet of Things Architecture for Smart Cities and Environmental Monitoring , 2018, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[19]  Stefano Giordano,et al.  A SDN-IoT Architecture with NFV Implementation , 2016, 2016 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[20]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Robust Trajectory Estimation for Crowdsourcing-Based Mobile Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[21]  Yu Wang,et al.  Enhancing participant selection through caching in mobile crowd sensing , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM 24th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS).

[22]  Hadi Otrok,et al.  GRS: A Group-Based Recruitment System for Mobile Crowd Sensing , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[23]  Dzmitry Kliazovich,et al.  Intelligent Gaming for Mobile Crowd-Sensing Participants to Acquire Trustworthy Big Data in the Internet of Things , 2017, IEEE Access.

[24]  Luca Foschini,et al.  Quantifying User Reputation Scores, Data Trustworthiness, and User Incentives in Mobile Crowd-Sensing , 2017, IEEE Access.

[25]  Huadong Ma,et al.  Heterogeneous-belief based incentive schemes for crowd sensing in mobile social networks , 2014, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[26]  Qi Han,et al.  The Emergence of Visual Crowdsensing: Challenges and Opportunities , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[27]  Salil S. Kanhere,et al.  Trust-based privacy-aware participant selection in social participatory sensing , 2015, J. Inf. Secur. Appl..