Assessing timebanking use and coordination: implications for service exchange tools

Timebanking is a generalized, voluntary service exchange that promotes use of otherwise idle resources in a community and facilitates community building. Participants offer and request services through the mediation of the timebank software. In timebanking, giving help and accepting help are both contributions; contributions are recognized and quantified through exchange of time-based currency. The purpose of this paper is to explore how users perceive timebank offers and requests differently and how they influence actual use.,This survey study, conducted in over 120 timebanks across the USA, examines users’ timebanking participation, adapting dimensions of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).,The authors found that perceived ease of use in timebanking platforms was positively associated with positive attitudes toward both requests and offers, whereas perceived usefulness was negatively associated with positive attitudes toward requests and offers. The authors also found that having positive attitudes toward requests was important to elicit behavioral intention to make a request, but that positive attitudes toward offers did not affect behavioral intentions to make offers.,The authors discussed these results and proposed design suggestions for future service exchange tools to address the issues the authors raised.,The study is among the first few studies that examine timebanking participation using large-scale survey data. The authors evaluate sociotechnical factors of timebanking participation through adapting dimensions of TAM.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes , 2000 .

[2]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Towards community-centered support for peer-to-peer service exchange: rethinking the timebanking metaphor , 2014, CHI.

[3]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[4]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology , 2015, Internet Res..

[5]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  On tests and indices for evaluating structural models , 2007 .

[6]  Mor Naaman,et al.  TAMIES: A Study and Model of Adoption in P2P Resource Sharing and Indirect Exchange Systems , 2017, CSCW.

[7]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[8]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Random acts of kindness: The intelligent and context-aware future of reciprocal altruism and community collaboration , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[9]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[10]  Rachel Botsman,et al.  What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption , 2010 .

[11]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  Confirmatory Analysis of Computer Self-Efficacy , 2003 .

[12]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test , 1973 .

[13]  John M. Carroll,et al.  It's Time There Was an App for That Too: A Usability Study of Mobile Timebanking , 2015, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[15]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Ed Collom,et al.  Time Banking and Health: The Role of a Community Currency Organization in Enhancing Well-Being , 2011, Health promotion practice.

[17]  Kirstie Hawkey,et al.  Exploring Privacy Notification and Control Mechanisms for Proximity-Aware Tablets , 2015, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Unequal Time for Unequal Value: Implications of Differing Motivations for Participation in Timebanking , 2015, CHI.

[19]  P. Barrett Structural equation modelling : Adjudging model fit , 2007 .

[20]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  ‘With a little help from my friends.’ Evaluating time banks as a tool for community self-help , 2003 .

[23]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Hua Wang,et al.  Understanding Online Community Participation , 2012, Commun. Res..

[25]  Juan D. Borrero,et al.  Expressive participation in Internet social movements: Testing the moderating effect of technology readiness and sex on student SNS use , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Edgar S. Cahn,et al.  No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative , 2004 .

[27]  Dong Hee Shin,et al.  User acceptance of mobile Internet: Implication for convergence technologies , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[28]  Chang Liu,et al.  Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet , 2003, Internet Res..

[29]  R. Budd Response Bias and the Theory of Reasoned Action , 1987 .

[30]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Further thoughts on the validity of measures of elation, gladness, and joy , 1991 .

[31]  John M. Carroll,et al.  In Search of Coproduction: Smart Services as Reciprocal Activities , 2016, Computer.

[32]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Peer-to-Peer Technology Business and Service Models: Risks and Opportunities , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[33]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[35]  Emma McGuirk Timebanking in New Zealand as a prefigurative strategy within a wider degrowth movement , 2017 .

[36]  Lucie K. Ozanne,et al.  LEARNING TO EXCHANGE TIME: BENEFITS AND OBSTACLES TO TIME BANKING , 2010 .

[37]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[38]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  “Can I wear this?” : blending clothing and digital expression by wearing dynamic fabric , 2017 .

[39]  Low-carbon currencies: The potential of time banking and local money systems for community carbon-reduction , 2009 .

[40]  Leslie Stoel,et al.  Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of Web-based courseware , 2003, Internet Res..

[41]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  The Time of our Lives: Using Time Banking for Neighbourhood Renewal and Community Capacity Building , 2002 .

[42]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[43]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Is there social capital in service exchange tools?: Investigating timebanking use and social capital development , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Karen S. Cook,et al.  Generalized Exchange and Social Dilemmas , 1993 .

[45]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[46]  E. Papaoikonomou,et al.  Time banking in Spain. Exploring their structure, management and users´ profile , 2016 .

[47]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Creating Value Together: The Emerging Design Space of Peer-to-Peer Currency and Exchange , 2015, CSCW.

[49]  Michael B. Marks Time banking service exchange systems: A review of the research and policy and practice implications in support of youth in transition , 2012 .

[50]  R. Belk You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online , 2014 .

[51]  G. Seyfang Time banks: rewarding community self-help in the inner city? , 2004 .

[52]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[53]  The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing research instruments in science education , 2017 .

[54]  Ed Collom,et al.  Engagement of the Elderly in Time Banking: The Potential for Social Capital Generation in an Aging Society , 2008, Journal of aging & social policy.

[55]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[56]  Ed Collom,et al.  Equal Time, Equal Value: Community Currencies and Time Banking in the US , 2012 .

[57]  Jaeki Song,et al.  Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[58]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[59]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[60]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[61]  Stuart Callison,et al.  “All You Need is Love”? Assessing Time Banks as a Tool for Sustainable Economic Development , 2003 .

[62]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[63]  T. Cooper,et al.  The role of values in collaborative consumption: insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK , 2015 .

[64]  Rupert Ward,et al.  Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[66]  Belinda Shipps,et al.  Social Networks, Interactivity and Satisfaction: Assessing Socio-Technical Behavioral Factors as an Extension to Technology Acceptance , 2013, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[67]  Monica M. Whitham,et al.  Getting is Giving: Time Banking as Formalized Generalized Exchange , 2016 .

[68]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Technology Use and Performance: A Field Study of Broker Workstations* , 1999 .

[69]  Ewen Speed,et al.  Varieties of co-production in public services: time banks in a UK health policy context , 2012 .

[70]  Pin Luarn,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2017 .

[71]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Co-production Scenarios for Mobile Time Banking , 2013, IS-EUD.

[72]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics , 2010 .

[73]  A. Satorra,et al.  A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis , 1999 .

[74]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[75]  Juho Hamari,et al.  The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[76]  E. Ostrom Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development , 1996 .