Leadership Roles and Communication Issues in Partially Distributed Emergency Response Software Development Teams: A Pilot Study

Emergencies often require inter-organizational and/or international coordination for effective planning and response. Therefore, planning and response teams are often configured as partially distributed teams. A partially distributed team (PDT) is a virtual team, in which some sub-groups are collocated, yet the subgroups are dispersed from each other, and communication between them is primarily by electronic media. We describe a project investigating different configurations of group and sub-group distribution and leadership in global PDTs engaged in tasks related to emergency response; in this paper we focus on results related to the leadership configuration (each of two subgroups in a team chose a local leader) and communication issues. Analysis of pilot data has helped us to articulate key leadership roles and suggests that significant in-group/out-group divides occurred. Implications for practitioners and future research plans are discussed.

[1]  Bartel Van de Walle,et al.  Open source software for disaster management , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[2]  Rosalie J. Ocker,et al.  Preliminary insights into the in-group/out-group effect in partially distributed teams: an analysis of participant reflections , 2006, SIGMIS CPR '06.

[3]  Kees Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management , 2007, Mobile Response.

[4]  H. Tajfel.  Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[5]  L. Chidambaram,et al.  Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Virtual Teams , 2006 .

[6]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Interactions Within Groups and Subgroups: The Effects of Demographic Faultlines , 2005 .

[7]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. , 2002 .

[8]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[9]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[11]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Online forums supporting grassroots participation in emergency preparedness and response , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[12]  J HindsPamela,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams , 2005 .

[13]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[14]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[15]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[16]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Emergent leadership in virtual teams: what do emergent leaders do? , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[17]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[19]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[20]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication , 2005 .

[22]  HiltzStarr Roxanne,et al.  An assessment of group support systems experimental research , 1998 .

[23]  L. Chidambaram,et al.  Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Virtual Teams A Longitudinal Study of Concentrated and Shared Leadership Behaviors , 2006 .