The complexity of the consistency and N-representability problems for quantum states - eScholarship

Quantum mechanics has important consequences for machines that store and manipulate information. In particular, quantum computers might be more powerful than classical computers; examples of this include Shor's algorithm for factoring and discrete logarithms, and Grover's algorithm for black-box search. Because of these theoretical results, and the possibility that we may eventually succeed in building scalable quantum computers, it is interesting to study complexity classes based on quantum computation. QMA (Quantum Merlin-Arthur) is the quantum analogue of the class NP. There are a few QMA-complete problems, most of which are variants of the Local Hamiltonian problem introduced by Kitaev. In this dissertation we show some new QMA-complete problems which are very different from those known previously, and have applications in quantum chemistry. The first one is Consistency of Local Density Matrices : given a collection of density matrices describing different subsets of an n-qubit system (where each subset has constant size), decide whether these are consistent with some global state of all n qubits. This problem was first suggested by Aharonov. We show that it is QMA-complete, via an oracle reduction from Local Hamiltonian. Our reduction is based on algorithms for convex optimization with a membership oracle, due to Yudin and Nemirovskii. Next we show that two problems from quantum chemistry, Fermionic Local Hamiltonian and N- representability, are QMA-complete. These problems involve systems of fermions, rather than qubits; they arise in calculating the ground state energies of molecular systems. N-representability is particularly interesting, as it is a key component in recently developed numerical methods using the contracted Schrodinger equation. Although these problems have been studied since the 1960's, it is only recently that the theory of quantum computation has provided the right tools to properly characterize their complexity. Finally, we study some special cases of the Consistency problem, pertaining to 1-dimensional and stoquastic systems. We also give an alternative proof of a result due to Jaynes : whenever local density matrices are consistent, they are consistent with a Gibbs state

[1]  David P. DiVincenzo,et al.  The complexity of stoquastic local Hamiltonian problems , 2006, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[2]  R. Oliveira,et al.  The complexity of quantum spin systems on a two-dimensional square lattice , 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[3]  Ben Reichardt,et al.  Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation , 2016, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[4]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[5]  Sandy Irani,et al.  The Power of Quantum Systems on a Line , 2007, 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'07).

[6]  Sandy Irani,et al.  The Complexity of Quantum Systems on a One-dimensional Chain , 2007, 0705.4067.

[7]  Nikhil Bansal,et al.  A classical approximation scheme for the ground-state energy of Ising spin Hamiltonians on planar graphs , 2007 .

[8]  Alastair Kay Quantum-Merlin-Arthur-complete translationally invariant Hamiltonian problem and the complexity of finding ground-state energies in physical systems , 2007 .

[9]  Matthias Christandl,et al.  Quantum computational complexity of the N-representability problem: QMA complete. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[10]  D. Mazziotti Anti-hermitian part of the contracted Schrödinger equation for the direct calculation of two-electron reduced density matrices , 2007 .

[11]  William Hall Compatibility of subsystem states and convex geometry , 2006, quant-ph/0610031.

[12]  S. Vempala Geometric Random Walks: a Survey , 2007 .

[13]  Barbara M. Terhal,et al.  Merlin-Arthur Games and Stoquastic Complexity , 2006, ArXiv.

[14]  T. Osborne Efficient approximation of the dynamics of one-dimensional quantum spin systems. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[15]  D. Mazziotti Variational reduced-density-matrix method using three-particle N-representability conditions with application to many-electron molecules , 2006 .

[16]  Irit Dinur,et al.  The PCP theorem by gap amplification , 2006, STOC.

[17]  Yi-Kai Liu Consistency of Local Density Matrices Is QMA-Complete , 2006, APPROX-RANDOM.

[18]  Yi-Kai Liu Gibbs States and the Consistency of Local Density Matrices , 2006, quant-ph/0603012.

[19]  Sergey Bravyi,et al.  Efficient algorithm for a quantum analogue of 2-SAT , 2006, quant-ph/0602108.

[20]  David A Mazziotti,et al.  Quantum chemistry without wave functions: two-electron reduced density matrices. , 2006, Accounts of chemical research.

[21]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  Simulated Annealing for Convex Optimization , 2004 .

[22]  A. Klyachko Quantum marginal problem and N-representability , 2005, quant-ph/0511102.

[23]  John Watrous,et al.  Zero-knowledge against quantum attacks , 2005, STOC '06.

[24]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully , 2005, cond-mat/0505140.

[25]  G. Mitchison,et al.  The Spectra of Quantum States and the Kronecker Coefficients of the Symmetric Group , 2004, quant-ph/0409016.

[26]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies , 2005, Science.

[27]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Mapping local Hamiltonians of fermions to local Hamiltonians of spins , 2005, cond-mat/0508353.

[28]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  Quantum computing, postselection, and probabilistic polynomial-time , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  P. Hayden,et al.  Quantum state transformations and the Schubert calculus , 2004, quant-ph/0410052.

[30]  S. Bravyi,et al.  Commutative version of the local Hamiltonian problem and common eigenspace problem , 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[31]  Michael A. Nielsen,et al.  Quantum computing and polynomial equations over the finite field Z2 , 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[32]  A. Klyachko QUANTUM MARGINAL PROBLEM AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP , 2004, quant-ph/0409113.

[33]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  Solving convex programs by random walks , 2004, JACM.

[34]  Julia Kempe,et al.  The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem , 2004, FSTTCS.

[35]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation , 2004, 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[36]  S. Bravyi Requirements for copatibility between local and multipartite quantum states , 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[37]  Dorit Aharonov,et al.  A lattice problem in quantum NP , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[38]  D. Janzing,et al.  "Identity check" is QMA-complete , 2003, quant-ph/0305050.

[39]  Julia Kempe,et al.  3-local Hamitonian is QMA-complete , 2003 .

[40]  Leonid Gurvits Classical deterministic complexity of Edmonds' Problem and quantum entanglement , 2003, STOC '03.

[41]  Julia Kempe,et al.  3-local Hamiltonian is QMA-complete , 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[42]  A. Sudbery,et al.  One-qubit reduced states of a pure many-qubit state: polygon inequalities. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[43]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Approximation Algorithms , 2001, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[44]  Mikhail N. Vyalyi,et al.  QMA=PP implies that PP contains PH , 2003, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[45]  Dorit Aharonov,et al.  Quantum NP - A Survey , 2002, quant-ph/0210077.

[46]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Quantum Information: An Introduction to Basic Theoretical Concepts and Experiments , 2002 .

[47]  Mikhail N. Vyalyi,et al.  Classical and Quantum Computation , 2002, Graduate studies in mathematics.

[48]  Keiji Matsumoto,et al.  Quantum Certificate Verification: Single versus Multiple Quantum Certificates , 2001, ArXiv.

[49]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Mixed-State Entanglement and Quantum Communication , 2001, quant-ph/0109124.

[50]  M. Lavagna Quantum phase transitions , 2001, cond-mat/0102119.

[51]  E. Knill,et al.  Quantum algorithms for fermionic simulations , 2000, cond-mat/0012334.

[52]  David Thomas,et al.  The Art in Computer Programming , 2001 .

[53]  John Watrous,et al.  Succinct quantum proofs for properties of finite groups , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[54]  B. Judd,et al.  Reduced Density Matrices: Coulson's Challenge , 2000 .

[55]  M. Sipser,et al.  Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution , 2000, quant-ph/0001106.

[56]  Russ Bubley,et al.  Randomized algorithms , 1995, CSUR.

[57]  L. Landau,et al.  Fermionic quantum computation , 2000 .

[58]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum Algorithm Providing Exponential Speed Increase for Finding Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors , 1998, quant-ph/9807070.

[59]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[60]  Lance Fortnow,et al.  Complexity limitations on quantum computation , 1998, Proceedings. Thirteenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (Formerly: Structure in Complexity Theory Conference) (Cat. No.98CB36247).

[61]  Leonard M. Adleman,et al.  Quantum Computability , 1997, SIAM J. Comput..

[62]  Dorit S. Hochba,et al.  Approximation Algorithms for NP-Hard Problems , 1997, SIGA.

[63]  D. Abrams,et al.  Simulation of Many-Body Fermi Systems on a Universal Quantum Computer , 1997, quant-ph/9703054.

[64]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing , 1997, SIAM J. Comput..

[65]  Lov K. Grover A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search , 1996, STOC '96.

[66]  Phokion G. Kolaitis Hardness Of Approximations , 1996 .

[67]  Michel Deza,et al.  Applications of cut polyhedra—II , 1994 .

[68]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Quantum complexity theory , 1993, STOC.

[69]  Miklós Simonovits,et al.  Random Walks in a Convex Body and an Improved Volume Algorithm , 1993, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[70]  J. G. Pierce,et al.  Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization , 2016 .

[71]  L. Brown Fundamentals of statistical exponential families: with applications in statistical decision theory , 1986 .

[72]  F. Barahona On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models , 1982 .

[73]  A. Szabó,et al.  Modern quantum chemistry : introduction to advanced electronic structure theory , 1982 .

[74]  Martin Grötschel,et al.  The ellipsoid method and its consequences in combinatorial optimization , 1981, Comb..

[75]  M. D. MacLaren The Art of Computer Programming. Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms (Donald E. Knuth) , 1970 .

[76]  Donald Ervin Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming, Volume II: Seminumerical Algorithms , 1970 .

[77]  Harold W. Kuhn,et al.  Combinatorial Approach to the N‐Representability of P‐Density Matrices , 1969 .

[78]  N. S. Barnett,et al.  Private communication , 1969 .

[79]  R. Wilcox Exponential Operators and Parameter Differentiation in Quantum Physics , 1967 .

[80]  A. J. Coleman THE STRUCTURE OF FERMION DENSITY MATRICES , 1963 .

[81]  R. Bellman Introduction to Matrix Analysis , 1972 .

[82]  C. A. Coulson,et al.  Present State of Molecular Structure Calculations , 1960 .

[83]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[84]  R. H. Tredgold Density Matrix and the Many-Body Problem , 1957 .