Isolated words enhance statistical language learning in infancy.

Infants are adept at tracking statistical regularities to identify word boundaries in pause-free speech. However, researchers have questioned the relevance of statistical learning mechanisms to language acquisition, since previous studies have used simplified artificial languages that ignore the variability of real language input. The experiments reported here embraced a key dimension of variability in infant-directed speech. English-learning infants (8-10 months) listened briefly to natural Italian speech that contained either fluent speech only or a combination of fluent speech and single-word utterances. Listening times revealed successful learning of the statistical properties of target words only when words appeared both in fluent speech and in isolation; brief exposure to fluent speech alone was not sufficient to facilitate detection of the words' statistical properties. This investigation suggests that statistical learning mechanisms actually benefit from variability in utterance length, and provides the first evidence that isolated words and longer utterances act in concert to support infant word segmentation.

[1]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Infant-Directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[2]  Marina Nespor,et al.  An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.

[4]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' memory for spoken words. , 1997, Science.

[5]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key , 2010, Cognition.

[6]  H. Gleitman,et al.  The current status of the motherese hypothesis , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[7]  S. Suter Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[8]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[10]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Names in frames: infants interpret words in sentence frames faster than words in isolation. , 2006, Developmental science.

[11]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[12]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Joost Van de Weijer,et al.  Language input for word discovery , 1999 .

[14]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Speech segmentation is facilitated by visual cues , 2010 .

[15]  M. Brent,et al.  On the discovery of novel wordlike units from utterances: an artificial-language study with implications for native-language acquisition. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  M. Brent,et al.  The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development , 2001, Cognition.

[17]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  The role of talker-specific information in word segmentation by infants. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Thierry Nazzi,et al.  When Mommy Comes to the Rescue of Statistics: Infants Combine Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cues to Segment Speech , 2012 .

[19]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  A moment of silence: How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning , 1986 .

[20]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[21]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[22]  A. Ninio,et al.  The relation of children's single word utterances to single word utterances in the input , 1992, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[24]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech , 1987 .

[25]  R. Aslin,et al.  Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. , 1990, Child development.

[26]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Testing the limits of statistical learning for word segmentation. , 2010, Developmental science.

[27]  J. Siskind A computational study of cross-situational techniques for learning word-to-meaning mappings , 1996, Cognition.

[28]  Toben H. Mintz Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech , 2003, Cognition.

[29]  L. Singh,et al.  Influences of Infant-Directed Speech on Early Word Recognition. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[30]  A. Fernald,et al.  Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants. , 1993, Child development.

[31]  T. Griffiths,et al.  A Bayesian framework for word segmentation: Exploring the effects of context , 2009, Cognition.

[32]  Charles D. Yang Universal Grammar, statistics or both? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  H. Bortfeld,et al.  Overcoming the Effects of Variation in Infant Speech Segmentation: Influences of Word Familiarity. , 2008, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[34]  Laurel Fais,et al.  Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese , 2007, Cognition.

[35]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants. , 2009, Child development.

[36]  A. Fernald,et al.  Young Children Learning Spanish Make Rapid Use of Grammatical Gender in Spoken Word Recognition , 2007, Psychological science.

[37]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  A moment of silence: How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning , 1986 .

[38]  Amanda Seidl,et al.  Infant word segmentation revisited: edge alignment facilitates target extraction. , 2006, Developmental science.

[39]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Stress changes the representational landscape: evidence from word segmentation , 2005, Cognition.

[40]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[41]  Ann M. Peters,et al.  The Units of Language Acquisition , 1983 .