Proxemic Behaviors During Gay/Straight Interactions: An Automated Analysis Through Kinect Depth-Sensing Camera.

Through two experimental studies (N = 150), we investigated proxemic behaviors featuring gay/straight dyadic interactions. In doing so, for the first time, we relied on an IR depth camera and considered the interpersonal volume between the interactants, a novel feature that exhaustively captures interactants' proxemic behaviors. Study 1 revealed that the straight participants' implicit sexual bias - but not the explicit prejudice - significantly predicted their volume while interacting with a study accomplice who was presented as gay (vs. straight). However, unlike previous research, mixed-model analyses revealed the higher their implicit bias was, the smaller the interpersonal volume that they maintained with the gay study accomplice, especially when the conversation focused on an intergroup-related (vs. neutral) topic. Study 2 was mainly designed to deepen this main finding. Results documented that highly implicitly biased participants who maintained a smaller interpersonal volume with a gay (vs. straight) study accomplice were more cognitively depleted after the interaction than low-biased participants, possibly suggesting that highly implicitly biased straight people can control this nonverbal behavior to appear as nonprejudiced in the gay interactant's eyes. Implications for research on sexual prejudice and intergroup nonverbal behaviors are discussed.

[1]  J. Bosson,et al.  Essentialist Beliefs and Sexual Prejudice Toward Feminine Gay Men , 2020, Journal of homosexuality.

[2]  M. Banaji,et al.  Patterns of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: I. Long-Term Change and Stability From 2007 to 2016 , 2019, Psychological science.

[3]  Julie Lorah.  Effect size measures for multilevel models: definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example , 2018, Large-scale Assessments in Education.

[4]  Ahmad M. Alghraibeh,et al.  Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison , 2017 .

[5]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Spotting prejudice with nonverbal behaviours , 2016, UbiComp.

[6]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Not “just words”: Exposure to homophobic epithets leads to dehumanizing and physical distancing from gay men , 2016 .

[7]  P. Devine,et al.  Inferences About Sexual Orientation: The Roles of Stereotypes, Faces, and The Gaydar Myth , 2016, Journal of sex research.

[8]  M. Cadinu,et al.  Masculine Self-Presentation and Distancing from Femininity in Gay Men: An Experimental Examination of the Role of Masculinity Threat , 2016 .

[9]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Why Do They Have to Flaunt it? Perceptions of Communicative Intent Predict Antigay Prejudice Based Upon Brief Exposure to Nonverbal Cues , 2014 .

[10]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Perceptual Underpinnings of Antigay Prejudice , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[11]  P. Devine,et al.  Stereotyping to Infer Group Membership Creates Plausible Deniability for Prejudice-Based Aggression , 2014, Psychological science.

[12]  Daniel Gatica-Perez,et al.  Nonverbal Social Sensing in Action: Unobtrusive Recording and Extracting of Nonverbal Behavior in Social Interactions Illustrated with a Research Example , 2014 .

[13]  M. Vianello,et al.  Implicit Sexual Attitude of Heterosexual, Gay and Bisexual Individuals: Disentangling the Contribution of Specific Associations to the Overall Measure , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  G. Herek,et al.  Sexual prejudice. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  R. Imhoff,et al.  Differentiating Islamophobia: Introducing a New Scale to Measure Islamoprejudice and Secular Islam Critique , 2012 .

[16]  J. N. Shelton,et al.  Predicting Behavior During Interracial Interactions: A Stress and Coping Approach , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[17]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[18]  Phillip Atiba Goff,et al.  The space between us: stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  M. Imhof,et al.  Does Sexual Orientation Have an Impact on Nonverbal Behavior in Interpersonal Communication? , 2007 .

[20]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[21]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Prejudice And Minority Proportion: Contact Instead Of Threat Effects , 2006 .

[22]  S. Sorbi,et al.  The Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery and Stroop test: normative values with age, education and gender corrections in an Italian population , 2006, Multiple sclerosis.

[23]  N. Dasgupta,et al.  From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: the moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  J. Richeson,et al.  Regulatory focus and executive function after interracial interactions , 2006 .

[25]  J. N. Shelton,et al.  African Americans' Implicit Racial Attitudes and the Depletion of Executive Function after Interracial Interactions. , 2005 .

[26]  J. Richeson,et al.  Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  M. Hebl,et al.  Promoting the “Social” in the Examination of Social Stigmas , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[28]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Jennifer A. Richeson,et al.  When Prejudice Does Not Pay , 2003, Psychological science.

[30]  Michelle R. Hebl,et al.  Formal and Interpersonal Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants , 2002 .

[31]  G. Herek,et al.  Victim Experiences in Hate Crimes Based on Sexual Orientation , 2002 .

[32]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  A. McConnell,et al.  Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes , 2001 .

[34]  P. Devine,et al.  Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice , 1998 .

[35]  J. Dovidio,et al.  On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes , 1997 .

[36]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nonconscious Behavioral Confirmation Processes: The Self-Fulfilling Consequences of Automatic Stereotype Activation , 1997 .

[37]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  G. Herek.  Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences , 1988 .

[39]  S. Fugita,et al.  Perceived Homosexuality , 1982 .

[40]  F. Crosby,et al.  Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. , 1980 .

[41]  A. W. Siegman,et al.  Nonverbal behavior and communication , 1979 .

[42]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .