Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE (18)Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) is widely used for the staging of lymphoma. We investigated whether the intensity of tumor FDG uptake could differentiate between indolent and aggressive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS PET studies of 97 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were untreated or had relapsed and/or persistent disease and had not received treatment within the last 6 months were analyzed, and the highest standardized uptake value (SUV) per study was recorded. Correlations were made with histopathology. RESULTS FDG uptake was lower in indolent than in aggressive lymphoma for patients with new (SUV, 7.0 +/- 3.1 v 19.6 +/- 9.3; P < .01) and relapsed (SUV, 6.3 +/- 2.7 v 18.1 +/- 10.9; P = .04) disease. Despite overlap between indolent and aggressive disease in the low SUV range (indolent, 2.3 to 13.0; aggressive, 3.2 to 43.0), all cases of indolent lymphoma had an SUV <or= 13. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that the SUV distinguished reasonably well between aggressive and indolent disease (area under ROC curve, 84.7%), and an SUV > 10 excluded indolent lymphoma with a specificity of 81%. With a higher cutoff for the SUV, the specificity would have been higher. CONCLUSION FDG uptake is lower in indolent than in aggressive lymphoma. Patients with NHL and SUV > 10 have a high likelihood for aggressive disease. This information may be helpful if there is discordance between biopsy and clinical behavior.

[1]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  R. Hicks,et al.  Frequent impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging and management of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2003, Clinical lymphoma.

[3]  A. Alavi,et al.  Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. , 2003, Blood.

[4]  U. Jäger,et al.  F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET ) for Staging and Follow-Up of Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma , 2003 .

[5]  M. Pepe The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction , 2003 .

[6]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2002 .

[7]  P. Dupont,et al.  Early restaging positron emission tomography with ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  F. O’Sullivan,et al.  Sarcoma tumor FDG uptake measured by PET and patient outcome: a retrospective analysis , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Effect of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET Imaging on Clinical Staging and Management of Patients with Malignant Lymphoma , 2001 .

[10]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) for the staging of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  J Kotzerke,et al.  2‐(fluorine‐18)fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography in the detection and staging of malignant lymphoma , 2001, Cancer.

[12]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[13]  G Flandrin,et al.  The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  P. Dupont,et al.  Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of 125 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  R. Coleman,et al.  The prognostic significance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[16]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Positron emission tomography in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: assessment of chemotherapy with fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1998, Blood.

[17]  Y. Koide,et al.  Evaluation of esophageal cancers using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  H. Yagata,et al.  Predicting the prognoses of breast carcinoma patients with positron emission tomography using 2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro[18F]‐D‐glucose , 1998, Cancer.

[19]  J. D. van der Walt,et al.  Detection of lymphoma in bone marrow by whole-body positron emission tomography. , 1998, Blood.

[20]  S. Reske,et al.  18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography as a new approach to detect lymphomatous bone marrow. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  E. Merkle,et al.  Extranodal malignant lymphoma: detection with FDG PET versus CT. , 1998, Radiology.

[22]  S M Larson,et al.  Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding , 1997, Cancer.

[23]  G. Salles,et al.  Incidence, predictive factors, and outcome of lymphoma transformation in follicular lymphoma patients. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M E Phelps,et al.  Whole-body FDG-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Y. Chung,et al.  F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and the Prognosis of Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma , 1997 .

[26]  H. Minn,et al.  Increased glucose metabolism in untreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a study with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1995, Blood.

[27]  B. Glimelius,et al.  Predicting malignancy grade with PET in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  K. Någren,et al.  Uptake of carbon-11-methionine and fluorodeoxyglucose in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a PET study. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  Rosenberg Sa Validity of the Ann Arbor staging classification for the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. , 1977 .

[30]  Y. Erdi,et al.  Standardized uptake value in pediatric patients: an investigation to determine the optimum measurement parameter , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  J. Diebold,et al.  Lymphoma classification--from controversy to consensus: the R.E.A.L. and WHO Classification of lymphoid neoplasms. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.