Aftermarket as premarket for Breakthrough Usage Innovation

How suppliers can leap-jump their direct customers in order to develop Breakthrough Usage Innovations (BUI) that concern the end users and propose radically new usages? We argue that the aftermarket segment could be considered by upstream firms traditionally involved in BtoB activities as a fast track and low cost probe for BUI. This idea is supported by theoretical foundations and by a longitudinal retrospective approach on automotive communication systems (from auto radio to telematic systems) based on a series of interactive research studies. In this research we experiment this idea through a case study based methodology research located in a major First Tier Supplier that developed an innovative driving assistance device addressing the aftermarket segment. This case study allows us to identify the structural conditions under which the aftermarket could be considered as a premarket for a certain type of innovations and especially the connection between the aftermarket department and the R&D in order to organize efficient learning from these low cost probes.

[1]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance , 2001 .

[2]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[3]  C. Midler,et al.  Intensive Innovation Context and Design System Dynamics. , 2002 .

[4]  S Thomke,et al.  Enlightened experimentation. The new imperative for innovation. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[5]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[6]  Gilles Garel,et al.  New Car Development Projects and Supplier Partnership , 1998 .

[7]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[8]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[9]  P. Fraser Johnson,et al.  Purchasing and Supply Management , 2001 .

[10]  Christophe Midler,et al.  Innovation-Based Competition and the Dynamics of Design in Upstream Suppliers , 2001 .

[11]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[12]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[13]  Mari Sako,et al.  Supplier relations in the UK car industry: good news—bad news , 1994 .

[14]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[15]  François Fourcade,et al.  Multilevel integration of exploration units : beyond the ambidextrous organization , 2007 .

[16]  Christophe Midler Intensive Innovation Context and Design System Dynamics. The Case of Car Information Communication Entertainment (ICE) Systems , 2002 .

[17]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[18]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[19]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Managing User Involvement in Service Innovation , 2003 .

[20]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Marketing malpractice: the cause and the cure. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[21]  Patrick W. Jordan,et al.  An Introduction to Usability , 1998 .

[22]  武石 彰,et al.  Knowledge partitioning in the inter-firm division of labor : the case of automotive product development , 1999 .

[23]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Improving R&D/marketing relations in technology‐based companies: Marketing's perspective , 1991 .

[24]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  Beyond Project Management: New Perspectives on the temporary – permanent dilemma , 2002 .

[25]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[26]  K. Clark Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[27]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .