Study of a small heat and power PEM fuel cell system generator

Abstract A micro-cogenerator based on a natural gas reformer and a PEMFC is studied in its entirety, pointing out the links between different sub-systems. The study is conducted within the EPACOP project, which aims at testing PEMFC systems on user sites to evaluate development and acceptance of this technology for small stationary applications. Five units were installed from November 2002 to May 2003 and have been operated until now, in real life conditions. They deliver up to 4 kW of AC power and about 6 kW of heat. Center for Energy and Processes (CEP), one of the scientific partners, processes and analyses the experimental data from the five units, running in different regions of France. This database and the study of the flowsheet enable to propose changes to enhance the efficiency of the system composed of a steam reforming, a shift and a preferential oxidation reactor, a fuel cell stack and heat exchangers. The steady state modelling and optimisation of the system is done with Thermoptim ® , a software developed within CEP for applied thermodynamics. At constant power, main targets are to decrease natural gas consumption, to increase heat recovery and to improve the water balance. This study is made using the pinch point analysis, at full load and partial load. Main results of this study are different system configurations that allow improvement of gross electrical and thermal efficiency and enable to obtain a positive water balance.

[1]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF HYDROGEN-FUELED PROTON EXCHANGE MEMBRANE FUEL CELLS FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND COGENERATION , 2000 .

[2]  John P. Kopasz,et al.  Water balance in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell system , 2002 .

[3]  B. Wetton,et al.  Water Management in PEM Fuel Cells , 2004 .

[4]  Dennis Witmer,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming , 2003 .

[5]  J. Mathiak,et al.  Coupling of a 2.5 kW steam reformer with a 1 kWel PEM fuel cell , 2004 .

[6]  Didier Mayer,et al.  A new approach to empirical electrical modelling of a fuel cell, an electrolyser or a regenerative fuel cell , 2004 .

[7]  J. C. Amphlett.  Performance Modeling of the Ballard Mark IV Solid Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell , 1995 .

[8]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming: II. Diffusional limitations and reactor simulation , 1989 .

[9]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[10]  P. Irving,et al.  Steam Reforming of Hydrocarbon Fuels , 2002 .

[11]  Whitney Colella,et al.  Modelling results for the thermal management sub-system of a combined heat and power (CHP) fuel cell system (FCS) , 2003 .

[12]  C. Chamberlin,et al.  Modeling of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance with an Empirical Equation , 1995 .

[13]  A. Heinzel,et al.  Reforming of natural gas—hydrogen generation for small scale stationary fuel cell systems , 2002 .

[14]  Takeshi Tabata,et al.  Performance of a natural gas fuel processor for residential PEFC system using a novel CO preferential oxidation catalyst , 2004 .

[15]  S. Kolaczkowski,et al.  Evaluation of thermodynamically favourable operating conditions for production of hydrogen in three different reforming technologies , 2002 .

[16]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Fuel cell system economics: comparing the costs of generating power with stationary and motor vehicle PEM fuel cell systems , 2004 .

[17]  G. Gigliucci,et al.  Demonstration of a residential CHP system based on PEM fuel cells , 2004 .