Inclusion probabilities in partially rank ordered set sampling

In a finite population setting, this paper considers a partially rank ordered set (PROS) sampling design. The PROS design selects a simple random sample (SRS) of M units without replacement from a finite population and creates a partially rank ordered judgment subsets by dividing the units in SRS into subsets of a pre-specified size. The subsetting process creates a partial ordering among units in which each unit in subset h is considered to be smaller than every unit in subset h^' for h^'>h. The PROS design then selects a unit for full measurement from one of these subsets. Remaining units are returned to the population based on three replacement policies. For each replacement policy, we compute the first and second order inclusion probabilities and use them to construct the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and its variance for the estimation of the population total and mean. It is shown that the replacement policy that does not return any of the M units, prior to selection of the next unit for full measurement, outperforms all other replacement policies.

[1]  Omer Ozturk Combining multi‐observer information in partially rank‐ordered judgment post‐stratified and ranked set samples , 2013 .

[2]  Brad C. Johnson,et al.  Design based estimation for ranked set sampling in finite populations , 2010, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[3]  Omer Ozturk Sampling from partially rank-ordered sets , 2010, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[4]  G. McIntyre A Method for Unbiased Selective Sampling, Using Ranked Sets , 2005 .

[5]  Yaprak Arzu Özdemir,et al.  Generalization of Inclusion Probabilities in Ranked Set Sampling , 2010 .

[6]  Jesse Frey Nonparametric mean estimation using partially ordered sets , 2012, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[7]  Frank Yates,et al.  Selection Without Replacement from Within Strata with Probability Proportional to Size , 1953 .

[8]  Omer Ozturk Quantile inference based on partially rank-ordered set samples , 2012 .

[9]  Jesse Frey,et al.  Recursive computation of inclusion probabilities in ranked-set sampling , 2011 .

[10]  M. F. Al-Saleh,et al.  A note on inclusion probability in ranked set sampling and some of its variations , 2007 .

[11]  D. Horvitz,et al.  A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe , 1952 .

[12]  Jesse Frey,et al.  Nonparametric Ranked-set Sampling Confidence Intervals for Quantiles of a Finite Population , 2006, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[13]  Mohammad Jafari Jozani,et al.  Randomized nomination sampling for finite populations , 2012 .

[14]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Estimation of population mean and variance in flock management: a ranked set sampling approach in a finite population setting , 2005 .

[15]  Mohammad Jafari Jozani,et al.  Confidence intervals for quantiles in finite populations with randomized nomination sampling , 2014, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[16]  Omer Ozturk,et al.  Two sample distribution-free inference based on partially rank-ordered set samples , 2012 .

[17]  Yaprak Arzu Özdemir,et al.  A New Formula for Inclusion Probabilities in Median-Ranked Set Sampling , 2008 .

[18]  Ganapati P. Patil,et al.  Finite population corrections for ranked set sampling , 1995 .