Automated inter-plant spacing sensing of corn plant seedlings and quantification of laying hen behaviors using 3d computer vision

Within-row plant spacing plays an important role in uniform distribution of water and nutrients among plants, hence affects the final crop yield. While manual in-field manual measurements of within-row plant spacing is time and labor intensive, little work has been carried out to automate the process. An automated system is developed using a state-of-the-art 3D vision sensor that accurately measures within-row corn plant spacing. The system is capable of processing about 1200 images captured from a 61 m crop row containing approximately 280 corn plants in about three and half minutes. Stocking density of laying hens in egg production remains an area of investigation from the standpoints of ensuring hen's ability to perform natural behaviors and production economic efficiency. It is therefore of socio-economic importance to quantify the effect of stocking density on laying hens behaviors and thus wellbeing. In this study, a novel method for automatic quantification of stocking density effect on some natural laying hen behaviors such as locomotion, perching, feeding, drinking and nesting is explored. Image processing techniques are employed on top view images captured with a state-of-the-art time-of-flight (TOF) of light based 3D vision camera for identification as well as tracking of individual hens housed in a 1.2 m × 1.2 m pen. A Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) sensor grid consisting of 20 antennas installed underneath the pen floor is used as a recovery system in situations where the imaging system fails to maintain identities of the hens.

[1]  Rangachar Kasturi,et al.  Machine vision , 1995 .

[2]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Guido Gerig,et al.  3D Multi-scale line filter for segmentation and visualization of curvilinear structures in medical images , 1997, CVRMed.

[4]  R. L. Nielsen,et al.  Stand Establishment Variability in Corn , 1993 .

[5]  Yoshiaki Shirai,et al.  Tracking Multiple Pedestrians in Crowd , 2000, MVA.

[6]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  A COMPUTER VISION METHOD FOR ON-LINE BEHAVIORAL QUANTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALLY CAGED POULTRY , 2006 .

[7]  M. Appleby,et al.  Effect of perches in laying cages on welfare and production of hens , 1992 .

[8]  J. Cooper,et al.  Behavioural priorities of laying hens , 2003 .

[9]  Carsten Steger,et al.  An Unbiased Detector of Curvilinear Structures , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Stephen Cameron,et al.  Experiments in automatic flock control , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Lie Tang,et al.  Plant Identification in Mosaicked Crop Row Images for Automatic Emerged Corn Plant Spacing Measurement , 2008 .

[12]  D. Sergeant,et al.  Computer visual tracking of poultry , 1998 .

[13]  Radu Horaud,et al.  Time-of-Flight Cameras , 2012, SpringerBriefs in Computer Science.

[14]  J Hu,et al.  Image-processing algorithms for behavior analysis of group-housed pigs , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[15]  Emerson D. Nafziger,et al.  Effects of Missing and Two‐Plant Hills on Corn Grain Yield , 1996 .

[16]  Emerson D. Nafziger,et al.  Response of corn to uneven emergence , 1991 .

[17]  Ferdinand van der Heijden Image Based Measurement Systems: Object Recognition and Parameter Estimation , 1995 .

[18]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Muliscale Vessel Enhancement Filtering , 1998, MICCAI.

[19]  Greg Stewart,et al.  Impact of Planter Type, Planting Speed, and Tillage on Stand Uniformity and Yield of Corn , 2004 .

[20]  M. Appleby,et al.  Motivational aspects of individual variation in response to nestboxes by laying hens , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Jian Jin,et al.  Corn plant sensing using real-time stereo vision , 2009 .

[22]  H. Xin,et al.  Feeding Behaviors of Laying Hens with or without Beak Trimming , 2002 .

[23]  D Berckmans,et al.  Do heavy broiler chickens visit automatic weighing systems less than lighter birds? , 2003, British poultry science.

[24]  Yehoshua Y. Zeevi,et al.  Complex Diffusion Processes for Image Filtering , 2001, Scale-Space.

[25]  Hongwei Xin,et al.  AN INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM FOR STUDYING FEEDING AND DRINKING BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUAL POULTRY , 2001 .

[26]  Chris McCarthy,et al.  Automated internode length measurement of cotton plants under field conditions , 2009 .

[27]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[28]  Jay D. Harmon,et al.  Comparison of image feature extraction for classification of swine thermal comfort behavior , 1998 .

[29]  D Berckmans,et al.  Computer-assisted image analysis to quantify daily growth rates of broiler chickens , 2003, British Poultry Science.

[30]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures , 1972, CACM.

[31]  Hongwei Xin,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Measurement Techniques of Feeding Behavior of Individual Poultry , 2001 .

[32]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Characterization of Parallel Thinning Algorithms , 1975, Inf. Control..

[33]  H.W. Cheng,et al.  Furnished cage system and hen well-being: Comparative effects of furnished cages and battery cages on behavioral exhibitions in White Leghorn chickens. , 2009, Poultry science.

[34]  M. Appleby Modification of laying hen cages to improve behavior. , 1998, Poultry science.

[35]  J. H. Ford,et al.  Corn growth and yield in uneven emerging stands , 1992 .

[36]  Joseph G. Lauer,et al.  Corn response to within row plant spacing variation , 2004 .

[37]  Kenji Tsukamoto,et al.  Poultry tracking system with camera using particle filters , 2009, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[38]  H. A. Elson,et al.  Development of furnished cages for laying hens , 2002, British poultry science.

[39]  A. R. Frosta,et al.  A vision guided robot for tracking a live , loosely constrained pig , 2004 .

[40]  J. Bareham A comparison of the behaviour and production of laying hens in experimental and conventional battery cages , 1976 .

[41]  Lie Tang,et al.  Automatic inter-plant spacing sensing at early growth stages using a 3D vision sensor , 2012 .

[42]  P. Abrahamsson,et al.  Furnished cages and aviaries for laying hens. Effects on production, health and use of facilities , 1996 .

[43]  Christine J Nicol,et al.  The effect of stocking density, flock size and modified management on laying hen behaviour and welfare in a non-cage system , 2006 .

[44]  Lie Tang,et al.  Real-Time Crop Row Image Reconstruction for Automatic Emerged Corn Plant Spacing Measurement , 2008 .

[45]  Thomas P. Minka,et al.  Gates , 2008, NIPS.

[46]  Robin D. Tillett,et al.  Modelling Collective Animal Behaviour using Extended Point Distribution Models , 1997, BMVC.

[47]  J. A. Marchant,et al.  Monitoring pig growth using a prototype imaging system , 1999 .

[48]  I. Duncan,et al.  Frustrated nesting behaviour: Relation to extra-cuticular shell calcium and bone strength in White Leghorn hens , 2003, British poultry science.

[49]  Greg Stewart,et al.  Within‐Row Plant Spacing Variability Does Not Affect Corn Yield , 2004, Agronomy Journal.

[50]  R. D. Tillett,et al.  Using model-based image processing to track animal movements , 1997 .

[51]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[52]  Hongwei Xin,et al.  Effects of Cage Stocking Density on Feeding Behaviors of Group-Housed Laying Hens , 2004 .

[53]  R. L. Vanderlip,et al.  Influence of Within‐row Variability in Plant Spacing on Corn Grain Yield1 , 1977 .

[54]  Brian L. Steward,et al.  Automatic corn plant population measurement using machine vision , 2001 .